Literature DB >> 31632795

Hybrid esophagectomy: the best of both worlds.

Jonathan Cools-Lartigue1, Lorenzo Ferri1.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID： 31632795      PMCID： PMC6783763          DOI： 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN： 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Sheraz R Markar; Tienhan S Dabakuyo-Yonli; Bernard Meunier; Denis Pezet; Denis Collet; Xavier B D'Journo; Cécile Brigand; Thierry Perniceni; Nicolas Carrère; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Simon Msika; Frédérique Peschaud; Michel Prudhomme; Franck Bonnetain; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Randomised trial, Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy versus open oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Miguel A Cuesta; Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Effects of improving outcomes after esophagectomy on the short- and long-term: a review of literature.

Authors:  Laura F C Fransen; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Postoperative Complications Drive Unplanned Readmissions After Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Rohun Bhagat; Michael R Bronsert; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Michael J Weyant; John D Mitchell; Natalia O Glebova; William G Henderson; David Fullerton; Robert A Meguid
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Post-discharge complications after esophagectomy account for high readmission rates.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Daniela Molena; Miloslawa Stem; Benedetto Mungo; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chao Li; Lorenzo E Ferri; David S Mulder; Annie Ncuti; Amy Neville; Lawrence Lee; Pepa Kaneva; Debbie Watson; Melina Vassiliou; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Laura Fransen; Misha Dp Luyer; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.