Literature DB >> 31080668

Effects of improving outcomes after esophagectomy on the short- and long-term: a review of literature.

Laura F C Fransen1, Misha D P Luyer1.   

Abstract

An esophagectomy is still correlated with a high morbidity rate, despite advances made in minimally invasive surgery, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and centralization of this type of surgery. The short-term benefits are clearly described for esophageal cancer surgery patients, however, the long-term effects are yet to be determined. In colorectal cancer, the association between complications, especially anastomotic leakage, shows detrimental effects on long-term survival and cancer recurrence. In esophageal cancer surgery, current evidence is scarce and the described results are conflicting. Optimization of perioperative care by introduction of minimally invasive surgery, ERAS programs and patient prehabilitation is promising and shows a clear effect on short-term outcomes. Potentially, this may also result in better outcomes on the long-term, although current evidence is insufficient to infer definite conclusions. Reduction of anastomotic leakage seems important to reduce risk of cancer recurrence and improve long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; complications; enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); long-term survival; minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31080668      PMCID: PMC6503271          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  6 in total

1.  Challenge for establishment of international benchmarks for complications associated with esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masaaki Iwatsuki; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Hybrid esophagectomy: the best of both worlds.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Cost-effectiveness comparisons of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) vs. non-ERAS for esophageal cancer in China: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Hong Wang; Xiaoyang Wang; Luyao Zhang; Cong Shen; Caihua Tian; Xiaoxia Xu; Xiang Li; Zongze Li; Shao-Kai Zhang; Bin-Bin Han
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

4.  High compliance to ERAS protocol does not improve overall survival in patients treated for resectable advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Magdalena Pisarska; Piotr Zarzycki; Katarzyna Truszkiewicz; Jan Witowski; Michael Su; Robert Kupis; Anna Gajdosz; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  ERAS® protocol improves survival after radical cystectomy: A single-center cohort study.

Authors:  François Crettenand; Olivier M'Baya; Nuno Grilo; Massimo Valerio; Florence Dartiguenave; Yannick Cerantola; Beat Roth; Jean-Daniel Rouvé; Catherine Blanc; Ilaria Lucca
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Late-course accelerated Hyperfractionation vs. Conventional Fraction Radiotherapy under precise technology plus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: comparison of efficacy and side effects.

Authors:  Hongtao Luo; Shihong Wei; Xiaohu Wang; Ruifeng Liu; Qiuning Zhang; Zhen Yang; Zheng Li; Xiyi Wei; Yuexiao Qi; Lijun Xu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.207

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.