Literature DB >> 31630011

REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs.

José Ignacio Orlando1, Huazhu Fu2, João Barbosa Breda3, Karel van Keer4, Deepti R Bathula5, Andrés Diaz-Pinto6, Ruogu Fang7, Pheng-Ann Heng8, Jeyoung Kim9, JoonHo Lee10, Joonseok Lee10, Xiaoxiao Li11, Peng Liu7, Shuai Lu12, Balamurali Murugesan13, Valery Naranjo6, Sai Samarth R Phaye5, Sharath M Shankaranarayana14, Apoorva Sikka5, Jaemin Son15, Anton van den Hengel16, Shujun Wang8, Junyan Wu17, Zifeng Wu16, Guanghui Xu18, Yongli Xu12, Pengshuai Yin18, Fei Li19, Xiulan Zhang20, Yanwu Xu21, Hrvoje Bogunović1.   

Abstract

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes difficult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE (https://refuge.grand-challenge.org), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018. The challenge consisted of two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Fundus photography; Glaucoma; Image classification; Image segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31630011     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  18 in total

1.  A CNN-aided method to predict glaucoma progression using DARC (Detection of Apoptosing Retinal Cells).

Authors:  Eduardo M Normando; Tim E Yap; John Maddison; Serge Miodragovic; Paolo Bonetti; Melanie Almonte; Nada G Mohammad; Sally Ameen; Laura Crawley; Faisal Ahmed; Philip A Bloom; Maria Francesca Cordeiro
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 2.  Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation - A Review.

Authors:  Mohammed Alawad; Abdulrhman Aljouie; Suhailah Alamri; Mansour Alghamdi; Balsam Alabdulkader; Norah Alkanhal; Ahmed Almazroa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Retinal Glaucoma Public Datasets: What Do We Have and What Is Missing?

Authors:  José Camara; Roberto Rezende; Ivan Miguel Pires; António Cunha
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Identifying Those at Risk of Glaucoma: A Deep Learning Approach for Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation and Their Boundary Analysis.

Authors:  Jongwoo Kim; Loc Tran; Tunde Peto; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

5.  PAPILA: Dataset with fundus images and clinical data of both eyes of the same patient for glaucoma assessment.

Authors:  Oleksandr Kovalyk; Juan Morales-Sánchez; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Inmaculada Sellés-Navarro; Ana Palazón-Cabanes; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.501

6.  Improving the generalization of glaucoma detection on fundus images via feature alignment between augmented views.

Authors:  Chengfeng Zhou; Juan Ye; Jun Wang; Zhiyong Zhou; Linyan Wang; Kai Jin; Yaofeng Wen; Chun Zhang; Dahong Qian
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Agostina J Larrazabal; Nicolás Nieto; Victoria Peterson; Diego H Milone; Enzo Ferrante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Joint optic disc and cup segmentation based on densely connected depthwise separable convolution deep network.

Authors:  Bingyan Liu; Daru Pan; Hui Song
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc.

Authors:  Ruben Hemelings; Bart Elen; João Barbosa-Breda; Matthew B Blaschko; Patrick De Boever; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Huazhu Fu; Fei Li; Yanwu Xu; Jingan Liao; Jian Xiong; Jianbing Shen; Jiang Liu; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.