| Literature DB >> 31630011 |
José Ignacio Orlando1, Huazhu Fu2, João Barbosa Breda3, Karel van Keer4, Deepti R Bathula5, Andrés Diaz-Pinto6, Ruogu Fang7, Pheng-Ann Heng8, Jeyoung Kim9, JoonHo Lee10, Joonseok Lee10, Xiaoxiao Li11, Peng Liu7, Shuai Lu12, Balamurali Murugesan13, Valery Naranjo6, Sai Samarth R Phaye5, Sharath M Shankaranarayana14, Apoorva Sikka5, Jaemin Son15, Anton van den Hengel16, Shujun Wang8, Junyan Wu17, Zifeng Wu16, Guanghui Xu18, Yongli Xu12, Pengshuai Yin18, Fei Li19, Xiulan Zhang20, Yanwu Xu21, Hrvoje Bogunović1.
Abstract
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes difficult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE (https://refuge.grand-challenge.org), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018. The challenge consisted of two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results.Entities:
Keywords: Deep learning; Fundus photography; Glaucoma; Image classification; Image segmentation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31630011 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545