| Literature DB >> 31628663 |
Sohair R Fahmy1, Nashwah Ismail Zaki2, Shaimaa Zakaria Eid1, Ayman Saber Mohamed3, Sarah S Hassanein1.
Abstract
Obesity has been identified with an expanded danger of a progression of illnesses that include different organ-frameworks of the body. In the present examination, we evaluated the hypolipidemic properties of Echinochrome (Ech) pigment in a high-fat diet (HFD) induced hyperlipidemia in rats. After the hyperlipidemic model was set up, rats were haphazardly separated into five groups as follows: normal control group, HFD group, Atorvastatin (ATOR) group (80 mg/kg), Ech group (1 mg/kg) and combined group ATOR + Ech. The outcomes demonstrated that Ech improves lipid profile, liver functions, kidney functions and antioxidant markers of obese rats. The findings of the present investigation indicated that the Ech possesses hypolipidemic potential in obese rats.Entities:
Keywords: Atorvastatin; Echinochrome; High-fat diet; Obesity; Oxidative stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 31628663 PMCID: PMC6814671 DOI: 10.1007/s13659-019-00221-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Prod Bioprospect ISSN: 2192-2209
Fig. 1Effect of Ech and ATOR on body weight gain in hyperlipidemic rats
Effect of Ech and ATOR on lipid profile in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | TG | TL | TC | LDL-C | HDL-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 17.62 ± 1.01a | 59.50 ± 6.15a | 114.53 ± 4.37a | 79.87 ± 2.83a | 39.33 ± 3.87b |
| HFD | 44.73 ± 2.78c | 272.0 ± 10.33e | 184.67 ± 6.13c | 166.62 ± 3.11c | 18.83 ± 0.48a |
| ATOR | 28.87 ± 0.98b | 194.17 ± 6.24d | 116.80 ± 2.64a | 77.02 ± 02.80a | 35.50 ± 1.52b |
| Ech | 20.67 ± 0.83a | 92.00 ± 11.24b | 121.45 ± 2.77a | 98.62 ± 1.47b | 37.67 ± 2.16b |
| ATOR+Ech | 28.78 ± 1.70b | 143.5 ± 21.61c | 134.17 ± 2.73b | 93.23 ± 2.69b | 36.17 ± 1.28b |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P < 0.05)
Effect of Ech and ATOR on liver biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | ALT | ALP | AST | T.Protein | Albumin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 33.17 ± 1.05a | 67.33 ± 4.19a | 103.83 ± 1.40a | 6.45 ± 0.39a | 3.75 ± 0.16a |
| HFD | 54.17 ± 1.28c | 155.33 ± 8.32c | 197.50 ± 4.51d | 5.70 ± 0.04a | 3.23 ± 0.03a |
| ATOR | 36.83 ± 1.96b | 71.33 ± 4.56b | 133.33 ± 2.85c | 5.80 ± 0.09a | 3.30 ± 0.07a |
| Ech | 37.50 ± 2.63b | 69.00 ± 5.57a | 113.67 ± 4.17b | 5.52 ± 0.09a | 3.28 ± 0.06a |
| ATOR+Ech | 37.33 ± 1.41b | 82.67 ± 9.17 b | 138.83 ± 9.81c | 5.57 ± 0.11a | 3.32 ± 0.08a |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P < 0.05)
Effect of Ech and ATOR on kidney and muscle biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | Creatinine | Urea | Uric acid | Creatinine kinase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 28.43 ± 2.81a | 1.18 ± 0.02a | 103.50 ± 16.01a |
| HFD | 0.76 ± 0.02c | 64.03 ± 5.47d | 1.58 ± 0.10c | 236.00 ± 6.85c |
| ATOR | 0.51 ± 0.02b | 41.30 ± 7.25c | 1.47 ± 0.02b | 220.17 ± 15.37c |
| Ech | 0.46 ± 0.01b | 35.73 ± 1.70b | 1.41 ± 0.04b | 135.33 ± 21.92b |
| ATOR+Ech | 0.55 ± 0.02b | 39.85 ± 3.80c | 1.44 ± 0.07b | 119.33 ± 5.79b |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P <0.05)
Effect of Ech and ATOR on liver oxidative stress biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | MDA | GSH | GST | CAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.00 ± 0.316 a | 6.16 ± 0.02c | 0.5763 ± 0.03c | 35.40 ± 3.043c |
| HFD | 5.22 ± 0.267c | 2.97 ± 0.01a | 0.3053 ± 0.04a | 12.60 ± 2.064a |
| ATOR | 4.98 ± 0.419c | 3.19 ± 0.04a | 0.3378 ± 0.01a | 15.40 ± 1.435a |
| Ech | 3.66 ± 0.175b | 5.0 ± 0.01b | 0.4308 ± 0.03b | 29.40 ± 2.482b |
| ATOR+Ech | 3.76 ± 0.279b | 4.79 ± 0.02b | 0.4875 ± 0.01b | 26.00 ± 1.048b |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P <0.05)
Effect of Ech and ATOR on kidney oxidative stress biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | MDA | GSH | GST | CAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.73 ± 0.09a | 10.08 ± 0.03d | 0.78 ± 0.02c | 51.02 ± 2.75c |
| HFD | 10.52 ± 0.27d | 8.60 ± 0.02a | 0.59 ± 0.03a | 32.37 ± 3.70a |
| ATOR | 10.23 ± 0.37d | 8.96 ± 0.02a | 0.61 ± 0.01a | 36.55 ± 1.21a |
| Ech | 8.53 ± 0.32b | 9.90 ± 0.02c | 0.70 ± 0.03b | 45.62 ± 4.36b |
| ATOR+Ech | 9.53 ± 0.23c | 9.40 ± 0.10b | 0.69 ± 0.03b | 47.48 ± 0.34b |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P <0.05)
Effect of Ech and ATOR on muscle oxidative stress biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats
| Groups | MDA | GSH | GST | CAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.97 ± 0.02a | 10.57 ± 0.02c | 0.19 ± 0.01c | 30.02 ± 2.92c |
| HFD | 3.83 ± 0.14d | 9.58 ± 0.01a | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 12.05 ± 1.90a |
| ATOR | 3.57 ± 0.21d | 9.86 ± 0.02a | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 14.62 ± 1.50a |
| Ech | 2.12 ± 0.04b | 10.07 ± 0.02b | 0.16 ± 0.01b | 24.90 ± 1.06b |
| ATOR+Ech | 2.17 ± 0.08c | 10.27 ± 0.03b | 0.16 ± 0b | 20.70 ± 4.15b |
Values are means ± se (n = 6 per group). Each value not sharing a common letter superscript is significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Photomicrograph of hematoxylin and eosin stained liver sections from control rats group (a), HFD group (b), ATOR group (c), Ech group (d) and ATOR + Ech group (e) (H&E × 400). Solid arrow: fat droplets, dotted arrow: fibrosis, arrowhead: necrosis
Fig. 3Photomicrograph of hematoxylin and eosin stained kidney sections from control rats group (a), HFD group (b), ATOR group (c), Ech group (d) and ATOR + Ech group (e) (H&E × 400). Solid arrow: glomeruli, dotted arrow: urinary space
Fig. 4Photomicrograph of hematoxylin and eosin stained muscle sections from control rats group (a), HFD group (b), ATOR group (c), Ech group (d) and ATOR + Ech group (e) (H&E × 400). Solid arrow: muscle fibers striation, dotted arrow: nucleus