| Literature DB >> 21812977 |
Saad A Noeman1, Hala E Hamooda, Amal A Baalash.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity has become a leading global health problem owing to its strong association with a high incidence of diseases. AIM: To induce rat obesity using high fat diet (HFD) and to estimate oxidative stress markers in their liver, heart and kidney tissues in order to shed the light on the effect of obesity on these organs.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21812977 PMCID: PMC3174870 DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-3-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Figure 1Comparison between the two studied groups as regards body weight.
Statistical comparison between all studied groups as regards to lipid profile
| Parameter | Group I | Group II | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.92 ± 7.75 | 0.64 ± 9.19 | P <0.05* | |
| 3.27 ± 0.23 | 2.32 ± 0.05 | P <0.05* | |
| 1.74 ± 0.043 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | P <0.001* | |
| 1.02 ± 0.06 | 1.9 ± 0.05 | P <0.001* | |
| 0.79 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | P <0.001* |
Statistical comparison between all studied parameters in liver tissues.
| Parameter | Group I | Group II | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 93.30 ± 9.63 | 21.7 ± 5.66 | P <0.05* | |
| 26.44 ± 2.32 | 20.16 ± 1.13 | P <0.05* | |
| 93.32 ± 9.62 | 124.2 4 ± 1.39 | P <0.05* | |
| 343.7 ± 21.36 | 470.9 ± 22.9 | P <0.05* | |
| 21.85 ± 2.68 | 29.14 ± 1.76 | P <0.05* | |
| 664.26 ± 6.66 | 665.80 ± 6.77 | P > 0.05 | |
| 151.833 ± 61.55 | 284.31 ± 110.60 | P <0.05* |
Statistical comparison between all studied parameters in the heart tissues.
| P | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.38 ± 4.75 | 48. 99 ± 4.40 | P <0.05* | |
| 18.4 ± 1.95 | 22.86 ± 2.95 | P <0.05* | |
| 90.54 ± 5.59 | 98.2 ± 3.67 | P <0.05* | |
| 289.6 ± 16.95 | 261.158 ± 62.09 | P <0.05* | |
| 26.1 ± 2.06 | 20.9 ± 2.06 | P <0.05* | |
| 591.8 ± 4.75 | 586.5 ± 9.5 | P >0.05 | |
| 188.54 ± 58.62 | 115.74 ± 30.26 | P <0.05* |
Statistical comparison between all studied parameters in the kidney tissues.
| P | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 69.09 ± 6.43 | 41.32 ± 4.79 | P < 0.001* | |
| 26.54 ± 3.4 | 18.86 ± 1.69 | P < 0.001* | |
| 89.89 ± 1.9 | 101 ± 2.38 | P < 0.001* | |
| 223.97 ± 10.459 | 258.76 ± 16.6 | P < 0.001* | |
| 20.94 ± 2.85 | 28.55 ± 4.779 | P < 0.001* | |
| 577.37 ± 7.69 | 585.9 ± 3.7 | P < 0.001* | |
| 93.23 ± 12.45 | 112.43 ± 15.32 | P < 0.001* |
Correlation matrix between MDA, PCO levels and the studied antioxidants in liver tissues.
| r | -0.642 | -0.423 | -0.796 | -0.325 | -0.652 | |
| P-value | 0.002 | 0.008* | 0.001* | 0.475 | 0.025* | |
| r | 0.410 | -0.685 | -0.586 | 0.319 | -0.420 | |
| P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.017* | 0.112 | 0.039* | |
Correlation matrix between MDA, PCO levels and the studied antioxidants in heart tissues.
| r | 0.597 | -0.841 | -0.684 | -0.201 | -0.583 | |
| P-value | 0.042* | 0.041* | 0.021* | 0.523 | 0.030* | |
| r | 0.410 | 0.685 | 0.586 | 0.355 | -0.523 | |
| P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.017* | 0.099 | 0.022* | |
Correlation matrix between MDA, PCO levels and the studied antioxidants in kidney tissues.
| r | -0.538 | -0.417 | -0.745 | -0.492 | -0.639 | |
| P-value | 0.022* | 0.028* | 0.044* | 0.020* | 0.011* | |
| r | 0.410 | 0.685 | 0.586 | 0.458 | -0.752 | |
| P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.017* | 0.007* | 0.009* | |