Literature DB >> 31628511

Future of kidney stone surgery: will we treat small stones with large-sized PCNL and big stones with RIRS?

Udo Nagele1, Theodoros Tokas2, Olivier Traxer3.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Access; Endourology; Flexible ureteroscopy; Laser; Low- and high-risk stone former; MIP; MIP S; Minimally invasive percutaneous stone treatment; RIRS; Residual fragments; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Trauma

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31628511     DOI： 10.1007/s00345-019-02983-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN： 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cao Dehong; Liu Liangren; Liu Huawei; Wei Qiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters.

Authors:  Kymora B Scotland; Tadeusz Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace; Ben H Chew
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Miniaturization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy Smaller, but better?

Authors:  Stephan Huusmann; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Clinically insignificant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era?

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Ahmed M Harraz; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Bassam Awad; Naser El-Tabey; Haytham Shebel; Ahmed M Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud El-Kenawy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Retreatment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the computed tomographic era: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew J Portis; Mark A Laliberte; Penny Tatman; Lisa Lendway; Michael S Rosenberg; Carl A Bretzke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Preoperative factors predicting spontaneous clearance of residual stone fragments after flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy.

Authors:  David A Rebuck; Amanda Macejko; Vishal Bhalani; Patrick Ramos; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Endoscopically Determined Stone Clearance Predicts Disease Recurrence Within 5 Years After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Dominik Stefan Schoeb; Fabian Adams; Werner Vach; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.942
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Can mini PCNL achieve the same results as RIRS? The initial single center experience.

Authors:  Shawqi George Ghazala; Sarbast Mohammed Saeed Ahmed; Ayad Ahmad Mohammed
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.