Literature DB >> 24837451

Retreatment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the computed tomographic era: long-term follow-up.

Andrew J Portis1, Mark A Laliberte2, Penny Tatman2, Lisa Lendway2, Michael S Rosenberg2, Carl A Bretzke3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term retreatment rates and explore prognostic factors after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the computed tomographic era.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent PCNL with a standardized technique attempting complete fragment detection and clearance by a single surgeon between September 2000 and June 2004 were identified. Through medical record, review details of procedures and outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 166 renal units in 150 subjects were evaluated. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were conducted in 129 subjects. Median follow-up was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 4.2-6.2 years). Future ipsilateral procedures were performed in 23 renal units (14%) at a median of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.7-3.7 years). The cumulative retreatment rate at 7 years for noncalcium stones (24%) was not significantly higher than for calcium-based stones (14%; P = .07). Stone-free renal units had a lower cumulative retreatment rate (4%) than those with residual fragments <2 mm (33%) or ≥2 mm (30%; P = .001). When controlling for residual fragment size, renal units that were composed of uric acid or struvite had an expected hazard rate of retreatment 3.34 times larger than renal units composed of calcium oxalate/phosphate (P = .02) and renal units that were not stone free had an expected hazard rate 7.87 times larger than renal units that were stone free (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: In this population of complex stone patients treated by PCNL, there appears to be no such thing as an "insignificant fragment." Efforts at initial stone clearance should be maximized.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24837451     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Future of kidney stone surgery: will we treat small stones with large-sized PCNL and big stones with RIRS?

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Theodoros Tokas; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Balloon dilator versus telescopic metal dilators for tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones and calyceal stones.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Shazly; Shady Salem; Adel Allam; Badawy Hathout
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.