Steven J de Jongh1, Jolien J J Tjalma1, Marjory Koller2, Matthijs D Linssen1,3, Jasper Vonk1, Michael Dobosz4, Annelies Jorritsma-Smit3, Jan H Kleibeuker1, Geke A P Hospers5, Klaas Havenga2, Patrick H J Hemmer2, Arend Karrenbeld6, Gooitzen M van Dam2,7, Boudewijn van Etten2, Wouter B Nagengast8. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Discovery Oncology, Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands w.b.nagengast@umcg.nl.
Abstract
Negative circumferential resection margins (CRM) are the cornerstone for the curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, in up to 18.6% of patients, tumor-positive resection margins are detected on histopathology. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the feasibility of optical molecular imaging as a tool for evaluating the CRM directly after surgical resection to improve tumor-negative CRM rates. Methods: LARC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy received an intravenous bolus injection of 4.5 mg of bevacizumab-800CW, a fluorescent tracer targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A, 2-3 d before surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01972373). First, for evaluation of the CRM status, back-table fluorescence-guided imaging (FGI) of the fresh surgical resection specimens (n = 8) was performed. These results were correlated with histopathology results. Second, for determination of the sensitivity and specificity of bevacizumab-800CW for tumor detection, a mean fluorescence intensity cutoff value was determined from the formalin-fixed tissue slices (n = 42; 17 patients). Local bevacizumab-800CW accumulation was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy. Results: Back-table FGI correctly identified a tumor-positive CRM by high fluorescence intensities in 1 of 2 patients (50%) with a tumor-positive CRM. For the other patient, low fluorescence intensities were shown, although (sub)millimeter tumor deposits were present less than 1 mm from the CRM. FGI correctly identified 5 of 6 tumor-negative CRM (83%). The 1 patient with false-positive findings had a marginal negative CRM of only 1.4 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the fluorescence intensities of formalin-fixed tissue slices yielded an optimal mean fluorescence intensity cutoff value for tumor detection of 5,775 (sensitivity of 96.19% and specificity of 80.39%). Bevacizumab-800CW enabled a clear differentiation between tumor and normal tissue up to a microscopic level, with a tumor-to-background ratio of 4.7 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD). Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, we showed the potential of back-table FGI for evaluating the CRM status in LARC patients. Optimization of this technique with adaptation of standard operating procedures could change perioperative decision making with regard to extending resections or applying intraoperative radiation therapy in the case of positive CRM.
Negative circumferential resection margins (CRM) are the cornerstone for the curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, in up to 18.6% of patients, tumor-positive resection margins are detected on histopathology. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the feasibility of optical molecular imaging as a tool for evaluating the CRM directly after surgical resection to improve tumor-negative CRM rates. Methods: LARC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy received an intravenous bolus injection of 4.5 mg of bevacizumab-800CW, a fluorescent tracer targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A, 2-3 d before surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01972373). First, for evaluation of the CRM status, back-table fluorescence-guided imaging (FGI) of the fresh surgical resection specimens (n = 8) was performed. These results were correlated with histopathology results. Second, for determination of the sensitivity and specificity of bevacizumab-800CW for tumor detection, a mean fluorescence intensity cutoff value was determined from the formalin-fixed tissue slices (n = 42; 17 patients). Local bevacizumab-800CW accumulation was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy. Results: Back-table FGI correctly identified a tumor-positive CRM by high fluorescence intensities in 1 of 2 patients (50%) with a tumor-positive CRM. For the other patient, low fluorescence intensities were shown, although (sub)millimeter tumor deposits were present less than 1 mm from the CRM. FGI correctly identified 5 of 6 tumor-negative CRM (83%). The 1 patient with false-positive findings had a marginal negative CRM of only 1.4 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the fluorescence intensities of formalin-fixed tissue slices yielded an optimal mean fluorescence intensity cutoff value for tumor detection of 5,775 (sensitivity of 96.19% and specificity of 80.39%). Bevacizumab-800CW enabled a clear differentiation between tumor and normal tissue up to a microscopic level, with a tumor-to-background ratio of 4.7 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD). Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, we showed the potential of back-table FGI for evaluating the CRM status in LARC patients. Optimization of this technique with adaptation of standard operating procedures could change perioperative decision making with regard to extending resections or applying intraoperative radiation therapy in the case of positive CRM.
Authors: Floris J Voskuil; Jasper Vonk; Bert van der Vegt; Schelto Kruijff; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Pieter J van der Zaag; Max J H Witjes; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Guolan Lu; Naoki Nishio; Nynke S van den Berg; Brock A Martin; Shayan Fakurnejad; Stan van Keulen; Alexander D Colevas; Greg M Thurber; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Broderick J House; Marcus J Kwon; Jasmin M Schaefer; Connor W Barth; Allison Solanki; Scott C Davis; Summer L Gibbs Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: H M Schouw; L A Huisman; H H Boersma; S Kruijff; Y F Janssen; R H J A Slart; R J H Borra; A T M Willemsen; A H Brouwers; J M van Dijl; R A Dierckx; G M van Dam; W Szymanski Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Paolo Dell'Oglio; Danny M van Willigen; Matthias N van Oosterom; Kevin Bauwens; Fabian Hensbergen; Mick M Welling; Huijbert van der Stadt; Elise Bekers; Martin Pool; Pim van Leeuwen; Tobias Maurer; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Tessa Buckle Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Floris Jan Voskuil; Steven Jakob de Jongh; Wouter Tjerk Rudolph Hooghiemstra; Matthijs David Linssen; Pieter Jan Steinkamp; Sebastiaan Antonius Hendrik Johannes de Visscher; Kees-Pieter Schepman; Sjoerd Geert Elias; Gert-Jan Meersma; Pascal Klaas Christiaan Jonker; Jan Johannes Doff; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Wouter Bastiaan Nagengast; Bert van der Vegt; Dominic James Robinson; Gooitzen Michell van Dam; Max Johannes Hendrikus Witjes Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Michael A Turner; Siamak Amirfakhri; Hiroto Nishino; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Pieter Jan Steinkamp; Floris Jan Voskuil; Bert van der Vegt; Jan Johannes Doff; Kees-Pieter Schepman; Sebastiaan Antonius Hendrik Johannes de Visscher; Wendy Kelder; Yalia Jayalakshmi; Jinming Gao; Baran Devrim Sumer; Gooitzen Michell van Dam; Max Johannes Hendrikus Witjes Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.488