Luo-Bin Ding1, Yao Li1, Guang-Yuan Liu1, Tai-Hang Li1, Feng Li1, Jian Guan1, Hua-Jun Wang2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, HeBei Province, China. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, GuangDong Province, China.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint disease characterized by gradual
irreversible loss of articular cartilage, breakdown of subchondral bone, and
synovium inflammation.[1] OA mainly affects mass-bearing joints, especially the knee joints, and
results in pain and motion restriction.[2] It is estimated that 9.6% of men and 18.0% of women worldwide aged above 60
yr suffer from symptomatic OA.[3] It is expected to be the fourth leading cause of disability by 2020, and so
it represents a major public health challenge in the near future.[4]In recent years, OA has been identified to have a strong positive association with
Glc metabolism disruption and diabetes mellitus (DM).[5,6] Several studies have found that
patients with type 2 DM have accelerated cartilage matrix degeneration and meniscus
lesions in comparison diabetes-free individuals.[7,8] In addition, our previous study
demonstrated that expressions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were significantly
elevated in type 2 DM than those in diabetes-free OA patients and healthy controls.[9] Also, the phenomenon that high concentration of Glc affects chondrocytes and
cartilage metabolism has also been observed in experimental studies. One study found
that 25 nM Glc attenuated proteoglycan synthesis induced by IGF-1 in rabbit chondrocytes.[10] Rosa et al. also indicated that high Glc induced initiation of the catalytic
alternations through inducing higher expressions MMP-1 and MMP-13 in human chondrocytes.[11] In a recent study, hyperglycemia was found to result in cartilage damage in
diabeticmice that could be reversed by pioglitazone.[12]Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is a type of RNA greater than 200 nucleotides in length
acting as non-protein coding RNA, whereas microRNAs (miRNAs) comprise a large family
of single-stranded, small, non-coding RNAs with a sequence length of 19–23 nucleotides.[13] LncRNA and miRNA dys-regulation are associated with aberrant biological
processes promoting a variety of diseases.[13] With the development of bioinformatics and functional genomics tools,
abnormal lncRNA and miRNA expressions were discovered in OA.[14,15] However, the
possible roles of lncRNA and miRNA in diabetic OA still remain unknown.The lncRNA plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) is located at 8q24.21.[16] PVT1 was originally identified as a common retroviral integration site in
murineleukemia.[17] PVT1 has been identified to play important roles in many diseases including
various cancers,[18] liver fibrosis,[19] and sepsis,[20] among others. Moreover, studies have also found that PVT1 expression was
associated with clinicopathological characteristics in many diseases.miR-26b is located in the human chromosome 2q35 and in the fourth intron of the
C-terminal domain small phosphatase 1 (CTDSP1) gene.[21] Different from PVT1, many studies have shown that miR-26b plays an inhibiting
role in the development and progression of many cancers and liver
fibrosis.[22,23] However, studies on PVT1 and miR-26b on diabetic OA are
rare.Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), also known as cellular communication network
factor 2 (CCN2), is a cysteine-rich matricellular protein involved in the control of
biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and
angiogenesis, as well as multiple pathologies including OA.[24] CTGF is found to be up-regulated in adjacent areas of cartilage surface
damage in OA as well as in synovial fluid of OA that stimulates the production of
inflammatory cytokines.[25] CTGF also activates NF-κB and increases the production of chemokines and
cytokines that leading to the reduction of proteoglycan contents in joint cartilage.[26] Furthermore, CTGF could subsequently control TGF-β signaling,[27] which plays pivotal roles in the development of OA.[28] Altered TGF-β signaling is frequently observed in patients with OA,[29] and inhibition of TGF-β signaling is considered to be a promising therapeutic
target for this disease.[30]In the present study, we hypothesized that LncRNA PVT1 might act as a competing
endogenous RNA (ceRNA) by sponging miR-26b to abolish the inhibitory effect of
miR-26b on CTGF, thereby activating the TGF-β1 signaling pathway and then promoting
diabetic OA. To address this, we detected PVT1 expression in human OA cartilage with
or without diabetes as well as in human chondrocytes. Furthermore, we investigated
the interaction between PVT1, miR-26b, and CGTF. Moreover, we also explored the role
of the PVT1 in regulating CGTF/TGF-β axis in hyperglycemia treated human
chondrocytes.
Materials and methods
Cartilage specimen collection and ethics statement
Articular cartilage was obtained from primary OA patients undergoing total knee
replacement surgery (n = 40, 20 males and 20
females, aged 50–70 yr), including 20 patients with diabetes and 20 patients
without diabetes. Normal cartilage samples were obtained from 15 donors (8 males
and 7 females, aged 52–67 yr) following trauma or death. All samples of
cartilage were collected from knees and stored at −80°C after promptly frozen by
liquid nitrogen. There were no significant differences regarding age and sex
distribution among the control and OA groups. Informed consents were obtained
from all patients or their relatives prior to specimen collection. All protocols
were carried out based on the Declaration of Helsinki, and the experiments were
approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital.
Isolation and culture of primary chondrocytes
To prepare the primary chondrocytes, the collected cartilage was minced and
pre-treated with trypsin for 10 min. Then, the tissue slices were digested
overnight (>15 h) with collagenase II in DMEM medium containing 10% FCS. The
isolated cells were then passed through a filter to remove the residual
cartilage matrix fragments, followed by centrifugation at
2000 g for 5 min. Afterward, cells were re-suspended in
DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics consisting of 100 U/ml
penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. During experiments, the cells were
subsequently cultured in Ham’s F-12 (regular Glc medium, RGM, 10 mM Glc) or in
the same medium supplemented with D-Glc to yield a final Glc concentration of 30
mM (high Glc medium, HGM).
Quantitative RT-PCR assay
Total RNA was extracted from the cartilage by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,
US). The cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, China) was used for the synthesis of cDNA
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was then reverse transcribed
into cDNAs using the Reverse Transcription System Kit (Takara, China). The cDNA
templates were amplified by qRT-PCR using SYBR Green PCR Mix (TaKaRa) with the
following primers: PVT1-F, 5′-TGAGAACTGTCCTTA CGTGACC -3′; PVT1-R,
5′-AGAGCACCAAGACT GGCTCT-3′; miR-26b-F, 5′-CCGGGACCCAGTTC AAGTAA-3′,
R,5′-CCCCGAGCCAAGTAATGGA G-3′; COL2A1-F, 5′-ATGACAATCTGGCTCCCAA CACTGC-3′,
R-5′-GACCGGCCCTATGTCCACAC CGAAT-3′; U6-F, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′, R,5′-
AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′; GAPDH-F, 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′, R,5′-TCCACC
ACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′. Comparative quantification was determined using the
2−ΔΔCt method. Expressions of PVT1 and miR-26b were normalized to
U6 small nuclear RNA, whereas COL2A1 was normalized to GAPDH. The qRT-PCR
results were analyzed and expressed as relative mRNA levels of the CT value,
which was then converted into fold-change.
Measurement of CGTF, TGF-β1, SMAD3, and MMP-13
Human chondrocytes (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in six-well plates in
Ham’s F-12 medium with 10% FBS. Chondrocytes (> 85% confluent) were cultured
in regular Glc medium or high Glc medium in the presence or absence of
pioglitazone (1, 10, or 50 mM). The levels of CGTF, TGF-β1, IL-6, and MMP-13 in
culture media were quantified by using the commercially available CGTF, TGF-β1,
IL-6, and MMP-13 specific ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s
instructions (R&D Systems, USA) at 24 h.
Alcian blue staining
Cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min.
Subsequently, cells were incubated with 0.1 mol/l hydrochloric acid solution
until its pH decreases to 1.0, followed by 1% Alcian blue staining overnight.
Finally, cells were washed with 0.1 mol/l hydrochloric acid solution.
Depositions were observed and captured under an inverted microscope.
Immunocytochemistry of type II collagen
The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated and paraffin-embedded
as described above. The sections were then incubated with blocking solution
[PBS/10% goat serum (Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing,
China)/0.1% Triton X-100] for 30 min, and were then incubated with monoclonal
rabbit anti-humanAbs against collagen type II (1:200; Beijing Biosynthesis
Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 2 h at room temperature (25°C) and washed with PBS
three times. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with HRP-conjugated
secondary Ab for 1 h at room temperature (1:1,000; ProteinTech Group, Inc.) and
washed with PBS three times. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with DAB
solution for 30 min at room temperature and washed with deionized water for 5
min. Finally, the sections were stained with hematoxylin to identify the nuclei.
Images were captured.
Luciferase reporter assay
The CTGF mutant 3′‑UTR was generated by replacing the seed regions of the miR‑26b
binding sites with 5′‑TTGGTT‑3′ and PVT1 mutant was generated using
site-directed mutagenesis. Subsequently, the mutant sequence was cloned into the
firefly luciferase‑expressing vector pGL3 (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.). As
for luciferase assay, the chondrocytes were seeded in 24‑well plates at
4 × 104 cells/well the day before transfection and transfected
with the CTGF wild type or mutant 3′‑UTR reporter vector (Shanghai GenePharma
Co., Ltd.), PVT1 or PVT1 mutant using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cells were harvested and lysed 48 h after
transfection and the luciferase activity was assayed using the Dual‑Luciferase
Reporter system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The β‑lactamase gene of
the pGL3 luciferase vector was used for the normalization of the luminescence
levels. Three independent experiments were performed.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
DNA oligo probes (GenePharma) labeled with Cy5 for LncPVT1 (50-GGTGCCATC
GGAAACCCTGGAT
ATTGCAGACA-30-Cy5) and FAM for miR-26b (50-AC ACAGCTCTTCCATATCTCCAG-30-FAM) were
utilized in the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
assays, whereas the nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-
2-phenylindole (DAPI). All procedures were carried out on the basis of the
manufacturer’s instructions (GenePharma), and all images were acquired using a
Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
RNA immunoprecipitation
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) was performed to investigate whether PVT1 and
miR-26b were in the same RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) complex. Briefly,
cell lysates of human chondrocytes were incubated with human anti-CTGF (Ago2) or
anti-IgG (Millipore) overnight at 4°C. Normal IgG was used as a negative
control. RNA-protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with protein A agarose
beads and RNA was extracted by using TRIzol (Invitrogen). The resulting purified
RNA was subjected to qRT-PCR analysis.
Biotin-coupled probe RNA pull down assay
To pull down the miRNA by LncRNA, human chondrocytes transfected with miR-26b
mimics were lysed and incubated with biotin-coupled probe of LncRNA PVT1 which
was pre-bound on magnetic beads. For 2 h, target RNA was pulled by the RNeasy
Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Biotin-coupled probe of miR-26b were processed
through the same protocol.
Synthesis and transfection of interfering RNA
We last explored the potential mechanisms of PVT1 and miR-26b in diabetic OA
through over-expressing PVT1 and miR-26b over-expressions. The full-length PVT1
cDNA fragments were cloned into the pcDNA 3.1 plasmid (Invitrogen, USA),
generating pcDNA3.1-PVT1.An empty pcDNA3.1 vector was used as the control. The
human chondrocytes were transfected with the respective constructs using
Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer’s
instructions. A miR-26b mimic (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China) was also constructed
to be transfected into chondrocytes. After transfection for 48 h, the human
chondrocytes were harvested for qRT-PCR and western blot analysis to examine
knockdown or over-expression efficiency.
Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from chondrocytes using a RIPA lysis bufferkit
(Santa Cruz, TX, USA). Protein lysates were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore Corp.
Billerica, MA, USA). After being blocked in 5% fat-free milk overnight at 4°C,
the membranes were then incubated with the following primary Abs: MMP-13
(1:1000, Abcam, UK), TGF-β1 (1:1000, Abcam), SMAD3 (1:1000, Abcam), CTGF
(1:1000, Abcam) and COL2A1 (1:1000, Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Then the membranes
were incubated with the secondary Ab IgG at room temperature for 1 h. The band
intensity was quantified with software Image J 6.0. GAPDH was used as the
loading control.
Statistical methods
GraphPad 6.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. The
significance was determined with the Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA. The
least significant difference (LSD) test was used for post-hoc analysis. The
measurement data were represented as mean ± SD.
P < 0.05 indicated statistically
significant differences.
Results
PVT1 was up-regulated in diabetic OA cartilage and negatively correlated with
miR-26b and type II collagen
The expressions of PVT1 in cartilage tissues and cultured chondrocytes were
analyzed by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that PVT1 was expressed at
higher levels in diabetic OA cartilage than non-diabetic knee OA cartilage
(P < 0.01 vs. non-diabetic OA) and
normal cartilage (P < 0.01 vs. normal
control) (Figure 1a). On
the other hand, miR-26b was expressed at lower levels in diabetic OA cartilage
than non-diabetic knee OA cartilage
(P < 0.05 vs. non-diabetic OA) and normal
cartilage (P < 0.01 vs. normal control)
(Figure 1b). PVT1
expressions in diabetic OA cartilage were significantly and negatively
correlated with miR-26b (r = −0.524,
P = 0.018) (Figure 1c) and COL2AI expression (Figure 1e). However, PVT1
expressions in diabetic OA cartilage were not significantly associated with
miR-26b (r = −0.104,
P = 0.662) (Figure 1d) and COL2AI expressions
(r = −0.283, P = 0.226)
(Figure 1f).
Figure 1.
(a) Comparison of PVT1 expression among diabetic OA, non-diabetic OA, and
normal control cartilage. (b) Comparison of miR-26b expression among
diabetic OA, non-diabetic OA, and normal control cartilage. (c)
Correlation of PVT1 expression with miR-26b expression in diabetic OA
cartilage. (d) Correlation of PVT1 expression with miR-26b expression in
non-diabetic OA cartilage. (e) Correlation of PVT1 expression with type
II collagen expression in diabetic OA cartilage. (f) Correlation of PVT1
expression with type II collagen expression in non-diabetic OA
cartilage.
(a) Comparison of PVT1 expression among diabetic OA, non-diabetic OA, and
normal control cartilage. (b) Comparison of miR-26b expression among
diabetic OA, non-diabetic OA, and normal control cartilage. (c)
Correlation of PVT1 expression with miR-26b expression in diabetic OA
cartilage. (d) Correlation of PVT1 expression with miR-26b expression in
non-diabetic OA cartilage. (e) Correlation of PVT1 expression with type
II collagen expression in diabetic OA cartilage. (f) Correlation of PVT1
expression with type II collagen expression in non-diabetic OA
cartilage.
Effects of high Glc and pioglitazone on PVT1, miR-26b expressions,
chondrocyte properties, and type II collagen in HGM-induced human
chondrocytes
We first explored the effects of pioglitazone on PVT1, miR-26b expressions, and
type II collagen. The expression of PVT1 was time-dependently increased in human
chondrocytes (Figure
2a). On the other hand, the expressions of miR-26b and type II collagen
mRNA were time-dependently decreased (Figure 2b and c). As also shown in Figure 2, pioglitazone
could dose dependently inhibit high Glc-induced PVT1 expression (Figure 2d). Furthermore,
pioglitazone could dose dependently reverse high Glc-inhibited miR-26b and
collagen II expression (Figure
2e and f). High Glc significantly decreased the formation of Alcian
blue deposit (Figure 3a and
b) and type II collagen expressions (Figure 3a and b), which could be reversed
by pioglitazone (Figure 3(a)
and (b)).
Figure 2.
Chondrocytes (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in FGM RGM and HGM for
24 h with or without pioglitazone (1, 10, and 50 mM). Cell lysates were
collected. The expressions of PVT1 (a, d), miR-26b (b, e), and type II
collagen (c, f) in the culture supernatants were measured by RT-PCR.
Data were expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
**P < 0.01 versus control;
*P < 0.05 versus control;
#P < 0.05 versus HGM
group.
Figure 3.
(a) Effect of high Glc and pioglitazone (50 µM) on the Alcian blue
staining and type II collagen. (b) Quantitative analysis of Alcian blue
staining. (c) Quantitative analysis of type II collagen
(**P < 0.001).
Chondrocytes (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in FGM RGM and HGM for
24 h with or without pioglitazone (1, 10, and 50 mM). Cell lysates were
collected. The expressions of PVT1 (a, d), miR-26b (b, e), and type II
collagen (c, f) in the culture supernatants were measured by RT-PCR.
Data were expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
**P < 0.01 versus control;
*P < 0.05 versus control;
#P < 0.05 versus HGM
group.(a) Effect of high Glc and pioglitazone (50 µM) on the Alcian blue
staining and type II collagen. (b) Quantitative analysis of Alcian blue
staining. (c) Quantitative analysis of type II collagen
(**P < 0.001).
Effects of high Glc and pioglitazone on the expression of CGTF, TGF-β1, IL-6,
and MMP-13 in HGM-induced human chondrocytes
We next evaluated the effect of pioglitazone on HGM-induced catalytic condition
and inflammatory responses as well as the expressions of CGTF and TGF-β1 in
human chondrocytes. As depicted in Figure 4, the protein expression of CGTF
(Figure 4a), TGF-β1
(Figure 4b), IL-6
(Figure 4c), and
MMP-13 (Figure 4d) were
significantly increased in HGM-induced human chondrocytes compared with FGM and
HGM. Furthermore, pioglitazone could dose dependently inhibit high Glc-induced
production of CGTF, TGF-β1, IL-6, and MMP-13 (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Chondrocytes (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in FGM RGM and HGM for
24 h with or without pioglitazone (1, 10, and 50 mM). Cell lysates were
collected. The expressions of CGTF (a), TGF-β1 (b), IL-6 (c), and MMP-13
(d) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. Data were
expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
**P < 0.01 versus control;
*P < 0.05 versus control;
#P < 0.05 versus HGM
group.
Chondrocytes (1 × 106/ml) were cultured in FGM RGM and HGM for
24 h with or without pioglitazone (1, 10, and 50 mM). Cell lysates were
collected. The expressions of CGTF (a), TGF-β1 (b), IL-6 (c), and MMP-13
(d) in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. Data were
expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
**P < 0.01 versus control;
*P < 0.05 versus control;
#P < 0.05 versus HGM
group.
LncRNA PVT1 abolishes the interaction of miR-26b with the targets of
CTGF
We performed bioinformatics analysis (DIANA TOOLS-LncBase v.2) to predict the
potential target miRNAs, and we focused on miR-26b. The predicted complementary
binding sites at the 3’-UTR are shown in Figure 5a. Bioinformatics analysis also
showed that CTGF were potential target genes of miR-26b (Figure 5c). As shown next, the luciferase
assay confirmed that CTGF was a target of miR-26b (StarBase v 2.0) (Figure 5b). Luciferase
activity assay showed that miR-26b mimic led to a notable decrease in luciferase
activity in PVT1-WT reporter compared with the mimic NC group, whereas had no
obvious effect on luciferase activity in PVT1-MUT reporter (Figure 5d). In order to further identify
the interaction among PVT1, miR-26b, and CTGF in human chondrocytes, we next
carried out RNA pull-down, RIP, and FISH assays.
Figure 5.
(a) Bioinformatics analysis of matching sequence of miR‑26b within 3′‑UTR
of CTGF. MuT CTGF 3′‑UTR is the mutation of the match sequence of 3′‑UTR
of CTGF with miR‑26b (StarBase v.2.0). (b) Luciferase reporter assay
revealed that miR‑26b binds to the 3′‑UTR of WT CTGF, not MUT CTGF.
Relative luciferase activity was quantified, and the data were presented
as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs.
respective NC groups. 3′‑UTR, 3′‑untranslated region; CTGF, connective
tissue growth factor; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; WT, wild
type; MUT, mutant. (c) The predicted binding sites between PVT1 and
miR-26b (DIANA TOOLS-LncBase v.2). (d) Luciferase activity was measured
in human chondrocytes co-transfected with mimic NC or miR-26b mimic and
PVT1-wt or PVT1-mut reporter at 48 h after transfection. PVT1 interacted
directly with miR-26b (*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01).
(a) Bioinformatics analysis of matching sequence of miR‑26b within 3′‑UTR
of CTGF. MuT CTGF 3′‑UTR is the mutation of the match sequence of 3′‑UTR
of CTGF with miR‑26b (StarBase v.2.0). (b) Luciferase reporter assay
revealed that miR‑26b binds to the 3′‑UTR of WT CTGF, not MUT CTGF.
Relative luciferase activity was quantified, and the data were presented
as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs.
respective NC groups. 3′‑UTR, 3′‑untranslated region; CTGF, connective
tissue growth factor; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; WT, wild
type; MUT, mutant. (c) The predicted binding sites between PVT1 and
miR-26b (DIANA TOOLS-LncBase v.2). (d) Luciferase activity was measured
in human chondrocytes co-transfected with mimic NC or miR-26b mimic and
PVT1-wt or PVT1-mut reporter at 48 h after transfection. PVT1 interacted
directly with miR-26b (*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01).RIP assays disclosed that PVT1 and miR-26b expressions were substantially
enriched by Ago2 Ab compared with control IgG Ab (Figure 6a). The biotin-coupled probe
pull-down assay was then performed and the results showed miR-26b was detected
in the PVT1 pulled-down pellet compared with the control group (Figure 6b). Also, PVT1 was
detected in the miR-26b pulled-down pellet compared with the control group
(Figure 6c). FISH
technology demonstrated that PVT1 (red fluorescence) and miR-26b (green
fluorescence) could be visualized in the cells, and co-localization was observed
in human chondrocytes (Figure
6d to g).
Figure 6.
(a) Relative PVT1 and miR-26b expression presented as fold enrichment in
Ago2 relative to normal IgG immune-precipitates. RIP assays disclosed
that PVT1 and miR-26b expressions were substantially enriched by Ago2 Ab
compared with control IgG Ab. (b) The biotin-coupled probe pull-down
assay was performed and the results showed miR-26b was detected in the
LncRNA PVT1 pulled-down pellet compared with the control group. (c)
LncRNA PVT1 was detected in the biotin-miR-26b vector compared with the
control group (d–g). PVT1 and miR-26b were co-localized in human
chondrocytes by FISH using confocal microscope. PVT1 was stained red
(d), miR-26b was stained green (e), nuclei were stained blue (DAPI) (f),
and overlapped expression was mixed (g) (scale bar, 20 µm).
(a) Relative PVT1 and miR-26b expression presented as fold enrichment in
Ago2 relative to normal IgG immune-precipitates. RIP assays disclosed
that PVT1 and miR-26b expressions were substantially enriched by Ago2 Ab
compared with control IgG Ab. (b) The biotin-coupled probe pull-down
assay was performed and the results showed miR-26b was detected in the
LncRNA PVT1 pulled-down pellet compared with the control group. (c)
LncRNA PVT1 was detected in the biotin-miR-26b vector compared with the
control group (d–g). PVT1 and miR-26b were co-localized in human
chondrocytes by FISH using confocal microscope. PVT1 was stained red
(d), miR-26b was stained green (e), nuclei were stained blue (DAPI) (f),
and overlapped expression was mixed (g) (scale bar, 20 µm).
LncRNA PVT1 on collagen production, MMP-13, and CTGF/TGF-β1 signaling
activation
Last we transfected the LncRNA PVT1 and miR-26b mimic into the human chondrocytes
in high Glc medium. After 48 h, we found PVT1 over-expression further
up-regulated the protein expression of MMP-3, CTGF, TGF-β1, Smad3, and decreased
type collagen II expression compared with control. On the other hand, miR-26b
mimic had the opposite effect. Co-transfection of pcDNA3.1-PVT1 and miR-26b
mimic had no significant differences regarding these protein expressions
compared with control, indicating the function of pcDNA3.1-PVT1 was attenuated
by miR-26b and vice versa (Figure 7). This data demonstrated that
the hyperglycemia-induced type II collagen reduction, and CTGF/TGF-β signaling
activation, was facilitated by PVT1 over-expression but attenuated by miR-26b
over-expression (original data are shown in Supplemental Table 1).
Figure 7.
(a) Western Blot analysis of type II collagen (b), CTGF (c), TGF-β1 (d),
SMAD3 (e), and MMP-13 (f) followed by pcDNA3.1-PVT1 and miR-26b mimic
after 48 h in high Glc medium.
(a) Western Blot analysis of type II collagen (b), CTGF (c), TGF-β1 (d),
SMAD3 (e), and MMP-13 (f) followed by pcDNA3.1-PVT1 and miR-26b mimic
after 48 h in high Glc medium.
Discussion
Our current study showed that PVT1 promoted collagen degradation through binding
miR‑26b and subsequently leading to the elevated expression of CTGF and TGF-β
signaling. Bioinformatics and biochemical analyses demonstrated that PVT1 was able
to directly bind to miR‑26b. In addition, bioinformatics prediction and dual
reporter luciferase assay revealed that miR‑26b directly targeted the CTGF 3′‑UTR.
Over-expression of PVT1 increased the expressions of CTGF, TGF-β1, SMAD3, and MMP-13
and decreased expression of type II collagen. Collectively, PVT1 plays an important
role in the hyperglycemia-induced collagen degradation in human chondrocytes by
attenuating the miR‑26b expression level to activate CTGF/TGF-β signaling.OA is an aging-related degenerative disease that severely influences the elders’ life
quality. However, there have been few clinical approaches available so far. In
recent years, authors looking to embrace a consensus of opinion related to the
pathogenesis of OA in their works have been devoting increasingly more attention to
the importance of a global metabolism component.[31] Advances in the basic and clinical sciences over these years have
substantiated the belief that OA is not merely a local problem associated with
cartilage damage, but that a wider approach is needed—including a systemic angle—in
view of a significant contribution of the diabetes.[32] Generally, risk factors for OA included age, mass, genetics and stimuli such
as growth factors and chemokines.[33] However, research has pointed out that diabetes, especially type II DM, can
be the only predictor for OA.[34,35]LncRNAs function through chromatin regulation, histone modification, chromatin
remodeling, genomic imprinting, and as ceRNAs in post-transcriptional regulation.[36] The ceRNA theory hypothesized that all types of RNA transcripts could
communicate with each other through a new “language” mediated by microRNA
(miR/miRNA) response elements.[37]The lncRNA PVT1 has been extensively studied in several types of cancer as mentioned
at the beginning. Recent studies have also demonstrated that PVT1 played important
roles both in OA and diabetes. Li found silencing PVT1 inhibited the apoptosis of OA
chondrocytes, and over-expression of PVT1 promoted the apoptosis of normal chondrocytes.[38] In addition, high expression of PVT1 was observed in OA cartilage and
IL-1β-stimulated chondrocytes, and down-regulation of PVT1 expression markedly
inhibited IL-1β-induced production of MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-13.[39] On the other hand, PVT1 has also been involved in the progression of diabetic
nephropathy through ECM accumulation.[40] Furthermore, PVT1 is associated with end-stage renal disease in both type 1
and type 2 diabetes.[41,42]miR-26b has been implicated to be a protector and found to be down-regulated during
OA progression.[43] miR-26b over-expression significantly decreased the histologic scores of OA
and intra-articular injection of miR-26b attenuated OA progression in
vivo.[43] On the other hand, miR-26b was found to be down-regulated in the disease of
diabetes both in human and animal studies.[44]In the present study, PVT1 was revealed to be significantly up-regulated in diabetic
OA in clinical cartilage tissue as well as high Glc medium. Subsequently, a
loss-of-function experiment demonstrated that the over-expression of PVT1 promoted
collagen degradation. Our bioinformatics analysis revealed that PVT1 harbors
predictive binding sites for miR-26b. Furthermore, miR-26b was capable of targeting
the CTGF that binds to TGF-β1 and can activate TGF-β1 expression.In conclusion, our study demonstrates that in hyperglycemia condition, PVT1 promotes
collagen degradation of human chondrocytes by acting as an endogenous sponge of
miR-26b, and further activating CTGF/TGF-β1 signaling. There still remains a need to
further seek the intensified mechanisms responsible for LncRNA PVT1 involved in
diabetes-induced OA, thus developing new and improved therapeutic strategies for
this chronic condition.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, INI881778 Supplemental Material for Long non-coding RNA
PVT1, a molecular sponge of miR-26b, is involved in the progression of
hyperglycemia-induced collagen degradation in human chondrocytes by targeting
CTGF/TGF-β signal ways by Luo-Bin Ding, Yao Li, Guang-Yuan Liu,
Tai-Hang Li, Feng Li, Jian Guan and Hua-Jun Wang in Innate Immunity
Authors: R Zeidler; S Joos; H J Delecluse; G Klobeck; M Vuillaume; G M Lenoir; G W Bornkamm; M Lipp Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Jan Neumann; Julio B Guimaraes; Ursula Heilmeier; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Georg Schett; Arndt Kleyer; Carlo Perricone; Enijad Sahinbegovic; Annamaria Iagnocco; Jochen Zwerina; Rolando Lorenzini; Franz Aschenbrenner; Francis Berenbaum; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Johann Willeit; Stefan Kiechl Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 19.112