Literature DB >> 3162186

Fragile sites, cancer chromosome breakpoints, and oncogenes all cluster in light G bands.

F Hecht1.   

Abstract

Fragile sites tend to be bands where breaks occur in cancer chromosome rearrangements that can involve oncogenes. The locations of fragile sites, cancer breakpoints, and oncogenes were therefore charted. All were predominantly in light G bands. Specifically, 78 of 89 (88%) fragile sites were in light G bands including the large group of common fragile sites inducible with aphidicolin (p less than 0.001). Of 61 cancer breakpoints, 50 (82%) were in light bands including translocation breakpoints (p less than 0.001). Thirteen of 14 (93%) oncogenes localized to light bands. The sharing of chromosome bands can stem from a biologically meaningful relationship, as between cancer breakpoints and oncogenes. Joint occupancy of chromosome bands can also reflect independent reasons to be in the same sector of the genome. Thus, fragile sites may well be in light bands because they are associated with active genes. This clearly does not rule out a biologic relationship between specific fragile sites and specific cancer breakpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3162186     DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of replication timing at the FRA10B and FRA16B fragile site loci.

Authors:  O Handt; E Baker; S Dayan; S M Gartler; E Woollatt; R I Richards; R S Hansen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Population cytogenetics of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites.

Authors:  B Tedeschi; P Vernole; M L Sanna; B Nicoletti
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Aphidicolin-inducible common fragile-site expression: results from a population survey of twins.

Authors:  M J Austin; J M Collins; L A Corey; W E Nance; M C Neale; R M Schieken; J A Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Cytogenetic damage induced by folate deficiency in mice is enhanced by caffeine.

Authors:  J T MacGregor; R Schlegel; C M Wehr; P Alperin; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Preferential localization of γH2AX foci in euchromatin of retina rod cells after DNA damage induction.

Authors:  Laura Lafon-Hughes; María Vittoria Di Tomaso; Pablo Liddle; Andrea Toledo; Ana Laura Reyes-Ábalos; Gustavo A Folle
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  The enigma of common fragile sites.

Authors:  I Simonic; G S Gericke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Role of DNA secondary structures in fragile site breakage along human chromosome 10.

Authors:  Laura W Dillon; Levi C T Pierce; Maggie C Y Ng; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Molecular characterization of common fragile sites as a strategy to discover cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Larissa Savelyeva; Lena M Brueckner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Biological staging of head and neck cancer and its role in developing effective treatment strategies.

Authors:  W M Lydiatt; S P Schantz
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  Chromosomal distribution of schizophrenia susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Mostafa Saadat
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.