Literature DB >> 31621692

Bioinformatics Analysis Identifies MicroRNAs and Target Genes Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Melanoma.

Qiao Li1,2, Li-Yu Zhang2, Shuang Wu1, Chen Huang3, Juan Liu4, Ping Wang5, Yuan Cao6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Melanoma of the skin can be associated with early metastases and poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) and target genes associated with prognosis in melanoma using bioinformatics analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database identified the microarray dataset GSE20994. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs) were first identified using R language software and validated by GEO2R. Potential target genes of DE-miRNAs were screened, and their targets and prognostic role were evaluated in the miRTarBase database. Pathway enrichment and functional annotation analysis for target genes were established using the DAVID database. miRNA-hub gene networks and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed and visualized using the STRING database and Cytoscape. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed using transcriptome and survival data from the UALCAN web tool. RESULTS There were 132 upregulated and 134 down-regulated DE-miRNAs identified from human melanoma samples. From the top three upregulated miRNAs, there were 580 potential predicted target genes, and from the top three down-regulated miRNAs, there 543 potential predicted target genes. miR-300 was upregulated, and miR-629 was down-regulated in melanoma. Two pivotal bub genes, TP53 and GAPDH, were identified in the PPI network. Five out of ten hub genes were modulated by upregulated miR-580, and five by miR-629. Increased mRNA expression of DAPK2 was associated with increased OS, and increased mRNA expression of SKCM, TECPR2, and ZNF781 were associated with reduced OS. CONCLUSIONS Bioinformatics analysis identified miRNAs and target genes associated with melanoma that may represent potential prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621692      PMCID: PMC6820336          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.917082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Melanoma is a malignant tumor that most commonly arises in the skin, but can develop from melanocytes that originate in the embryonic neural crest at other sites. Worldwide, melanoma accounts for 90% of deaths from skin tumors [1]. In 2018 in the US, there were more than 90,000 reported cases of invasive melanoma, and the number of cases is predicted to increase to 116,000 by the year 2026 [2,3]. Melanoma is an aggressive form of malignancy that is associated with rapid growth, early metastasis, local recurrence, and poor prognosis. Melanoma is currently ranked as the sixth most common malignancy in the US, and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 70%, even with early radical surgery [4]. Therefore, early detection and recognition of melanoma are keys to improve survival. The standard treatment for primary melanoma of the skin is surgical excision [5]. Other treatments, such as immunotherapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, are applied to treat advanced melanoma. However, the results are not satisfactory, especially for melanomas that metastasize to lymph nodes or major organs. Therefore, it is important to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms of melanoma and to identify more beneficial early diagnostic techniques and more reliable molecular markers for monitoring recurrence and evaluating prognosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs between 21–25 nucleotides in length. They are found in diverse organisms and play important roles in regulating the translation and degradation of messenger RNAs through base pairing and binding to the 3′-untranslated region [6]. Expression profiling studies have identified several miRNAs that are involved in the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of melanoma cells in vitro and the immune response to cutaneous melanoma in vivo [7]. Studies that have profiled the expression of miRNA in melanoma have identified several miRNAs that have a role in melanoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, and miRNAs involved in melanoma cell apoptosis and the immune response to cutaneous melanoma in vivo [8-10]. MiR-211, miR-200c, miR-205, miR-196a, and miR-218 participate in the initiation and progression of melanoma. MiRNAs, including miR-30b/d, miR-34a/b/c, miRNA-155, and miR-182, are activated in the regulation of immune response in melanoma. Invasion and metastasis associated with miRNAs have been widely studied, including Let-7a/b, miR-200a/c, miR-145, and miR-203. In terms of therapeutic options for melanoma, upregulation of miR-21 has been shown to augment chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity. Although previous studies have identified the role of individual miRNAs in melanoma, there have been few previous gene array studies to investigate the role of miRNAs and target genes. Gene expression microarrays provide a snapshot of genome-wide expression in health and disease and have become a method to study the biological behavior of human tumors. Therefore, this study aimed to identify miRNAs and target genes associated with prognosis in melanoma using bioinformatics analysis. The study included screening differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs), analysis of functional and pathway enrichment, and integration of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, to identify miRNAs associated with prognosis in melanoma.

Material and Methods

Microarray data in cases of melanoma

Microarray data were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (). The microarray dataset GSE20994 was identified based on the GPL9040 platform (febit Homo sapiens miRBase 13.0), which included samples from 35 patients with melanoma and 22 normal controls, was downloaded and used for this study.

Screening for differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs)

The downloaded platform and series of matrix files were converted for use with the R language software and annotation package. Data were normalized through the array function of the limma R package () [11]. The differences between the melanoma patient group and the controls were compared using Student’s t-test. The screening thresholds of DE-miRNAs were set as P <0.05, and a fold-change (FC), defined as the ratio of the difference between the final value and the initial value when divided by the initial value, was identified as >1. Further validated procedures for the DE-miRNAs were performed using the online GEO2R analysis tool from the GEO database.

Prognostic value of target genes of DE-miRNAs in melanoma

The miRTarBase online database was used to identify the prognostic value of target genes. The miRTarBase database contained thousands of miRNA-target interactions (MTIs) collected from filtered research articles and experimentally validated () [12]. In this study, the top ten upregulated and down-regulated DE-miRNAs were identified by miRTarBase, a database of curated experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions, and were analyzed to identify the target genes.

Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of DE-miRNAs

The DAVID database () is an online tool for high-throughput functional analysis of genes. The functional and pathway enrichment of the candidate miRNAs were analyzed and annotated using the DAVID database [13]. GO annotations were performed using the DAVID online tool on the screened DE-miRNAs. The KEGG pathway analysis of DE-miRNAs was also performed by using the DAVID database. DE-miRNAs that were significantly upregulated and down-regulated were determined from microarray melanoma data, with P<0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance.

Integration of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks

The STRING database () was used to analyze the PPI networks and to predict the genes that targeted the top ten most upregulated and down-regulated DE-miRNAs. The results were visualized using Cytoscape version 3.7.1, a software platform used to visualize complex networks [14]. After miRNA and hub gene networks were established, the top 25 hub genes were acquired and visualized using Cytoscape version 3.7.1.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis associated with target genes for patients with melanoma

UALCAN is an interactive web resource for analyzing cancer transcriptome data. The target genes of DE-miRNAs were uploaded to UALCAN (). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for the distinct effect of target gene expression on patient survival. Using two-sided statistical analysis, significance was assumed to be P<0.05.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs (DE-miRNAs) and the prognostic value of target genes in melanoma

The downloaded microarray dataset GSE20994 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) online database included 35 cases of melanoma (GSM524779-GSM524813) and 22 normal controls (GSM524757-GSM524778). Before further analysis, the data were normalized (Figure 1). Data were then analyzed using the unpaired t-test (P<0.05; log2 FC >1). There were 266 DE-miRNAs that were identified from the dataset (Figure 2), and approximately half the miRNAs were upregulated (132 miRNAs). Table 1 lists the top ten most upregulated miRNAs and the most down-regulated miRNAs. Following ranking of the miRNAs according to the degree of fold-change (FC), hsa-miR-300, hsa-miR-519e, and hsa-miR-580 were the three leading upregulated miRNAs, and hsa-miR-629, hsa-miR-601, and hsa-miR-29c were the three leading down-regulated mi RNAs. Following identification by the miRNA and target interaction database, 580 candidate target genes were identified for the three upregulated miRNAs that had prognostic value in melanoma. There were 543 possible targets that matched the three down-regulated miRNAs. Figure 3 shows the volcano plot and the scatter plot of all the DE-miRNAs.
Figure 1

Normalization of the GSE20994 microarray dataset obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. (A) Data before standardization. (B) Data after standardization.

Figure 2

Differentially expressed microRNAs (DE-miRNAs) in 35 cases of melanoma and 22 normal controls. (A) Heatmap of DE-miRNAs. (B) Details of the 57 cases.

Table 1

Top ten up-regulated and down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs between melanoma and normal control.

miRNAsLog2FCAverage expressiontP valueadj. P valueBRegulated
hsa-miR-3002.79613.8485195.5627967.13E-071.03E-055.615772Up-regulated
hsa-miR-519e2.66634.0964064.7167271.56E-050.0001372.636554Up-regulated
hsa-miR-5802.5482383.9610575.4323521.16E-061.56E-055.145503Up-regulated
hsa-miR-5922.2295874.2321543.8285970.0003190.001585−0.24548Up-regulated
hsa-miR-520g2.1761824.1156524.2913746.85E-050.0004451.217952Up-regulated
hsa-miR-513b2.131543.8613824.2869526.95E-050.0004481.203549Up-regulated
hsa-miR-12432.08134.893484.1617770.0001060.0006410.799017Up-regulated
hsa-miR-519a2.076493.6895354.4161814.46E-050.0003261.627542Up-regulated
hsa-miR-8732.053184.2453043.3839280.0012880.004893−1.55677Up-regulated
hsa-miR-12451.9747014.372694.0687740.0001450.0008140.502595Up-regulated
hsa-miR-629−3.905456.058667−6.550681.68E-086.05E-079.261758Down-regulated
hsa-miR-601−3.762493.126457−6.494092.09E-086.68E-079.049936Down-regulated
hsa-miR-29c−3.732073.475553−6.369883.36E-089.37E-078.585987Down-regulated
hsa-miR-142-3p−3.532674.662733−5.608016.02E-078.82E-065.779536Down-regulated
hsa-miR-328−3.427935.918518−6.600931.38E-085.20E-079.449997Down-regulated
hsa-miR-942−3.353673.757525−5.768973.29E-075.62E-066.365488Down-regulated
hsa-let-7b−3.329953.329909−5.621325.73E-078.69E-065.827828Down-regulated
hsa-miR-186−3.31596.216168−8.044085.28E-115.29E-0914.88909Down-regulated
hsa-miR-483-3p−3.222294.785116−5.767073.32E-075.62E-066.358526Down-regulated
hsa-miR-1262−3.084862.046869−5.653045.09E-078.00E-065.943025Down-regulated
Figure 3

Volcano plot of the differentially expressed microRNAs (DE-miRNAs). The black points represent genes with no significant difference. The red points represent upregulated genes screened based on the fold-change >1.0 and a corrected P-value of <0.05. The green points represent down-regulated genes screened based on the fold-change >1.0 and a corrected P-value of <0.05.

Enrichment analysis of the KEGG pathway

GO functional annotation, and the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed to analyze the pathways of candidate target genes further. Three GO categories, the biological pathway (BP), the cellular component (CC), and the molecular function (MF) were chosen for functional annotation. For the target genes associated with the top ten upregulated DE-miRNAs, the top ten GO terms included the regulation of gene expression, metabolism, and energy pathway in the BP category, lysosomes, plasma membranes, and exosomes in the CC category, and DNA binding, cytokine activity, and the regulation of translational activity in the MF category (Figures 4A–4C). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the regulation of DE-miRNAs was localized to three pathways, the Notch, Wnt, and N-cadherin signaling pathways (Figure 4D). Figure 5A–5D show the results of the analysis of the target genes of the leading ten most down-regulated DE-miRNAs.
Figure 4

Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis for the target genes of the top ten most upregulated microRNAs (miRNAs). (A) Enriched functional biological process (BP) of the target genes. (B) Enriched cellular component (CC) of the target genes. (C) Enriched molecular function (MF) of the target genes. (D) Enriched KEGG pathways of the target genes.

Figure 5

Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis for the target genes of the top ten most down-regulated microRNAs (miRNAs). (A) Enriched functional biological process (BP) of the target genes. (B) Enriched cellular component (CC) of the target genes. (C) Enriched molecular function (MF) of the target genes. (D) Enriched KEGG pathways of the target genes.

Mapping of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and the miRNA target network

Physiologically, proteins rarely function alone but function in networks. In this study, PPI networks were identified for potential target genes to identify the top ten most down-regulated and upregulated miRNAs using the STRING database of known and predicted PPIs. Cytoscape software was used to visualize the data, and 25 hub nodes were identified and evaluated by degree, as shown in Table 2. For upregulated miRNAs, TP53, HSPA8, MDM2, NOTCH1, CDKN1A, CREB1, HNRNPA2B1, SMAD2, CDN1B, and RAC1 were the top ten hub genes, and TP53 showed the highest node degree (node degree=83). For down-regulated miRNAs, the leading ten hub genes were GAPDH, VEGFA, PTEN, JUN, SITT1, CDC42, MDM2, CREBBP, MMP2, and FOS and GAPDH showed the highest node degree (node degree=64). Figure 6 shows the networks based on these screened hub genes, constructed using Cytoscape visualization software.
Table 2

Hub genes identified in the PPI networks.

Up-regulated miRNAsDown-regulated miRNAs
Gene symbolDegreeGene symbolDegree
TP5383GAPDH64
HSPA842VEGFA63
MDM238PTEN52
NOTCH135JUN45
CDKN1A32SIRT139
CREB127CDC4239
HNRNPA2B125MDM238
SMAD224CREBBP37
CDKN1B22MMP236
RAC121FOS35
RPS6KB119MAPK1434
SOX918CASP829
PSMC118CCNA229
PARP118IGF1R27
NCOA318COL1A226
RPS1618DICER125
PSME317HIST1H2AC25
NIFK17CDK625
RPL1217COL1A124
NOLC116HIST1H2BB23
CTPS116MCL123
PCF1116HIST1H2BH23
WEE115AKT223
THY115MYCN22
GNG1215PDGFRB22
Figure 6

The mapped networks of the top 25 hub genes constructed using Cytoscape software. (A) The mapped networks for upregulated miRNAs. (B) The mapped networks for down-regulated miRNAs.

The miRNA hub gene network was mapped further, as shown in Figure 7A. Five out of ten hub genes (DMRT2, MTCH1, MTERF4, NHS, and MMGT1) could be potentially modulated by hsa-miR-580. Three hub genes and two hub genes could be potentially modulated by hsa-miR-300 and hsa-miR-520g, respectively. Also, hsa-miR-629 could potentially target eight out of ten hub genes (ASCAN22, ZNF781, ZFP1, ABHD2, IRF2BP2, TECPR2, CCDC43, and BNC2). Three hub genes were chosen as the most likely targets modulated by hsa-miR-29c (Figure 7B). Therefore, hsa-miR-580 and hsa-miR-629 were identified as being most likely to be associated with the pathogenesis and development of melanoma.
Figure 7

The mapped microRNA (miRNA) and hub gene networks. (A) The mapped networks for upregulated miRNAs. (B) The mapped networks for down-regulated miRNAs.

Survival analysis

Survival analysis of potential target genes showed that patients with melanoma who had high mRNA expression of DAPK2 had improved overall survival (OS) (Figure 8). However, patients with melanoma who had high mRNA expression for SKCM, TECPR2, and ZNF781 had reduced OS (Figure 9).
Figure 8

Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis of the prognostic value of hub genes for upregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) in melanoma.

Figure 9

Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis of the prognostic value of hub genes for down-regulated microRNAs (miRNAs) in melanoma.

Discussion

Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy that is heterogeneous in terms of behavior and prognosis. Melanoma of the skin is often diagnosed at a late stage and has a low response to chemotherapy. Surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage melanoma. Radiotherapy may not improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma. However, there is a need for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for melanoma. In the present study, differential expression analysis of micro RNA (miRNA) arrays downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database identified 266 differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs) in melanoma samples compared with normal controls. In melanoma, hsa-miR-300 was mainly upregulated, and hsa-miR-629 was mainly down-regulated. Previous studies have shown that miR-300 expression was associated with several human malignancies. In gastric cancer, miR-300 expression was found to be significantly upregulated when compared with adjacent normal gastric tissue, and reduced cell proliferation in gastric tumorigenesis [15]. Also, serum levels of miR-300 were significantly increased in patients with osteosarcoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when compared with healthy controls, and increased expression of miR-300 promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell proliferation, and cell migration in vitro through activation of the bromodomain-containing protein 7 (BRD7) gene, but in HCC it acted through the FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [16-18]. Similar findings were shown for colorectal and breast cancer, where miR-300 promoted cancer cell proliferation and cell migration by targeting p53 [19,20]. In the present study, hub gene and miRNA networks were constructed to identify the interactive relationships in melanoma. The results showed that six DE-miRNAs could regulate the top 25 hub genes from the top ten upregulated miRNAs in melanoma. Among these miRNAs, miR-629 was the leading targeted hub gene in eight hub genes identified. The results showed that miR-629 might be a negative modulator for the development of melanoma. Previous studies have shown that miR-629 functions as a tumorigenic factor in renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer [21-23]. By regulating TGF-β/Smad signaling, miR-629 has been shown to increase cell migration of renal cell carcinoma cells, [23]. Overexpression of miR-629 increased cell proliferation and migration of pancreatic carcinoma in both in vitro and in vivo by targeting FOXO3 [21]. Also, miR-629 has been shown to promote proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells by suppressing the tumor suppressor gene, testis-specific Y-like protein 5 (TSPYL5) [22]. In this study, although miR-629 was predicted to be a tumor suppressor in melanoma, the molecular mechanisms require further study, particularly given the heterogeneity of melanoma in terms of behavior and prognosis. In this study, the DAVID database, Gene Ontology (GO) annotation, and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis identified ten miRNAs. Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis was performed for the hub genes for five down-regulated miRNAs and five upregulated miRNAs associated with prognosis in patients with melanoma. The most significant enrichment of upregulated miRNAs was found in the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor signaling network. PDGF receptor signaling promoted tumor growth by several mechanisms, including promoting tumor angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and mitosis in cancer-associated fibroblasts [15,16]. The PDGF signaling pathway has previously been shown to promote angiogenesis in colorectal cancer (CRC) by targeting pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, and high levels of PDGF receptors were associated with tumor invasion and metastasis [24]. Clinical studies have shown that increased expression of PDGF was associated with more aggressive biological behavior in breast cancer and prostate cancer, and resulted in poor prognosis [25,26]. Our findings were with the findings from previously published studies that showed that PDGF also promoted more aggressive clinical behavior in melanoma [15]. Following the construction of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks in this study, TP53 and GAPDH were mapped as the hub genes with the highest degree of connectively. TP53, also known as tumor protein p53, is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes a DNA-binding transcription factor governing multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair, cell growth, cell metabolism, cell apoptosis, cell senescence, and cell death [27]. TP53 has a role in the pathogenesis of several human cancers. Wang et al. showed that miR-300 regulated the expression of p53 protein by binding to the 3′-UTR of P53 in human colorectal cancer cells to promote cell proliferation and cell migration of colorectal cancer cells [19]. In the present study, TP53 was identified in melanoma by PPI network analysis. However, this finding requires validated in further experimental studies. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is a key housekeeping gene and reference gene for quantification of gene expression in human tumors [28]. A previous study showed that GAPDH was significantly expressed in melanoma and was associated with cell invasion, but its mechanism in melanoma remains unclear [29]. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed using transcriptome and survival data from the UALCAN web tool. Although DAPK2 was not in the top 25 hub genes, this was the only gene associated with improved patient survival in melanoma (Figure 8). DAPK2 is regulated by both miR-520g and miR-519e, and is a tumor suppressor gene that has a role in programmed cell death, the regulation of autophagy, and diverse developmental processes [30,31]. Dysregulation of miR-520g expression was shown to be involved in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) [30,31]. Increased expression of miR-520g reduced survival in patients with ovarian cancer and was associated with tumor progression and chemoresistance to platinum-based chemotherapy by down-regulating DAPK2 [32]. In the present study, TECPR2 and ZNF781 were associated with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival (OS) in patients with melanoma, regulated by miR-629. To highlight the heterogeneity of melanoma, in 2017, Zhang et al. used microarray data from a small number of patients with melanoma (N=21) and benign nevus (N=11) and showed that COL17A1 was enriched in melanoma [33]. The miRNA and gene regulatory network showed that miR-375 targeted CCL27, and miR-375 targeted IGF1R [33]. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies on the association between the two genes, TECPR2 and ZNF781, and miR-629 in melanoma. However, as this study has shown, bioinformatics analysis and the identification of miRNAs and target genes can be identified that are potentially associated with melanoma.

Conclusions

This study aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) and target genes associated with prognosis in melanoma using bioinformatics analysis. In this study, miR-300 was upregulated, and miR-629 was down-regulated in melanoma, two pivotal bub genes, TP53 and GAPDH, were identified in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, increased mRNA expression of DAPK2 was associated with increased OS, and increased mRNA expression of SKCM, TECPR2, and ZNF781 were associated with reduced OS. These preliminary findings may stimulate further research on the prognostic role of these miRNAs and target genes in patients with melanoma.
  33 in total

1.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.

Authors:  Da Wei Huang; Brad T Sherman; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  miR-300 regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting the FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Authors:  Rongchang Wang; Zheng Yu; Fan Chen; Hongxu Xu; Shunli Shen; Wei Chen; Lianzhou Chen; Qiao Su; Longjuan Zhang; Jiong Bi; Wentao Zeng; Wen Li; Xiaohui Huang; Qian Wang
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 3.  MicroRNAs in cutaneous melanoma: Role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Casey L Ross; Shivani Kaushik; Rodrigo Valdes-Rodriguez; Rina Anvekar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J Meirion Thomas; Julia Newton-Bishop; Roger A'Hern; Gill Coombes; Michael Timmons; Judy Evans; Martin Cook; Jeffery Theaker; Mary Fallowfield; Trevor O'Neill; Wlodek Ruka; Judith M Bliss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  MiR-300 regulate the malignancy of breast cancer by targeting p53.

Authors:  Xiao-Heng Xu; Da-Wei Li; Hui Feng; Hong-Mei Chen; Yan-Qiu Song
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  MicroRNA-520g induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting SMAD7.

Authors:  Heping Kan; Wenbin Guo; Yuqi Huang; Dingli Liu
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life.

Authors:  Damian Szklarczyk; Andrea Franceschini; Stefan Wyder; Kristoffer Forslund; Davide Heller; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Milan Simonovic; Alexander Roth; Alberto Santos; Kalliopi P Tsafou; Michael Kuhn; Peer Bork; Lars J Jensen; Christian von Mering
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Up-Regulation of MiR-300 Promotes Proliferation and Invasion of Osteosarcoma by Targeting BRD7.

Authors:  Zhen Xue; Jindong Zhao; Liyuan Niu; Gang An; Yashan Guo; Linying Ni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High expression of PDGFR-β in prostate cancer stroma is independently associated with clinical and biochemical prostate cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Yngve Nordby; Elin Richardsen; Mehrdad Rakaee; Nora Ness; Tom Donnem; Hiten R H Patel; Lill-Tove Busund; Roy M Bremnes; Sigve Andersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  MiR-629 promotes human pancreatic cancer progression by targeting FOXO3.

Authors:  Haijiao Yan; Qing Li; Jun Wu; Wenwei Hu; Jingting Jiang; Liangrong Shi; Xin Yang; Danxia Zhu; Mei Ji; Changping Wu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.469

View more
  8 in total

1.  Establishment and validation of an autophagy-related prognostic signature for survival predicting in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Hongjun Fei; Xiongming Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Comprehensive analysis and identification of key genes and signaling pathways in the occurrence and metastasis of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Hanying Dai; Lihuang Guo; Mingyue Lin; Zhenbo Cheng; Jiancheng Li; Jinxia Tang; Xisha Huan; Yue Huang; Keqian Xu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Micro-RNA 122 and micro-RNA 96 affected human osteosarcoma biological behavior and associated with prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Shuqiang Yao; Jiping Zhou
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Identification of HMMR as a prognostic biomarker for patients with lung adenocarcinoma via integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Zhaodong Li; Hongtian Fei; Siyu Lei; Fengtong Hao; Lijie Yang; Wanze Li; Laney Zhang; Rui Fei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Nomogram based on autophagy related genes for predicting the survival in melanoma.

Authors:  Guangtong Deng; Wenhua Wang; Yayun Li; Huiyan Sun; Xiang Chen; Furong Zeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  MicroRNAs: understanding their role in gene expression and cancer.

Authors:  Ariany Lima Jorge; Erik Ribeiro Pereira; Christian Sousa de Oliveira; Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Edmara Toledo Ninzoli Menon; Susana Nogueira Diniz; Julia Alejandra Pezuk
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-07-16

7.  Circular RNA hsa_circ_0072309 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression by sponging miR-580-3p.

Authors:  Wenguang Pang; Fengliu Huang; Xin Zhang; Min Ye; Yanming Huang; Xiufang Huang; Jingzhuo Pang; Chengjie Cai; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Bioinformatic Analysis Identifies Potential Key Genes in the Pathogenesis of Melanoma.

Authors:  Yanjie Han; Xinxin Li; Jiliang Yan; Chunyan Ma; Xin Wang; Hong Pan; Xiaoli Zheng; Zhen Zhang; Biao Gao; Xin-Ying Ji
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.