Literature DB >> 31620241

Comparison of Large Chemical Spaces.

Uta Lessel1, Christian Lemmen2.   

Abstract

Chemical libraries are commonplace in computer-aided drug discovery, and assessing their overlap/complementarity is a routine task. For this purpose, different techniques are applied, ranging from exact matching to comparing physicochemical properties. However, these techniques are applicable only if the compound sets are not too big. Particularly for chemical spaces, containing billions of compounds, alternative ways of assessment are required. Random subsets could be enumerated and compared one-to-one, but given the vast sizes of the chemical spaces assessed here, such samples can at best provide a rough estimate of any overlap. Here we describe a novel way to compare chemical spaces utilizing a panel of query compounds. We applied this technique to three different types of spaces and obtained insight into their structural overlap, their coverage of the chemical universe, and their density. As chemical feasibility of virtual compounds is particularly important, we included related in silico predictions in our assessment.
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31620241      PMCID: PMC6792285          DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-5875            Impact factor:   4.345


  20 in total

1.  Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery.

Authors:  Joseph L Durant; Burton A Leland; Douglas R Henry; James G Nourse
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

2.  Topomers: a validated protocol for their self-consistent generation.

Authors:  Robert J Jilek; Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction and mapping of compound libraries for drug discovery.

Authors:  Michael Reutlinger; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 4.  Diversity in medicinal chemistry space.

Authors:  Alain-Dominique Gorse
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Searching Fragment Spaces with feature trees.

Authors:  Uta Lessel; Bernd Wellenzohn; Markus Lilienthal; Holger Claussen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Feature trees: a new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching.

Authors:  M Rarey; J S Dixon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  The rise, fall and reinvention of combinatorial chemistry.

Authors:  Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  The next level in chemical space navigation: going far beyond enumerable compound libraries.

Authors:  Torsten Hoffmann; Marcus Gastreich
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  Mapping of Drug-like Chemical Universe with Reduced Complexity Molecular Frameworks.

Authors:  Aleksejs Kontijevskis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  AllChem: generating and searching 10(20) synthetically accessible structures.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer; Farhad Soltanshahi; Robert Jilek; Brian Campbell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.