Literature DB >> 9834908

Feature trees: a new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching.

M Rarey1, J S Dixon.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a new method for evaluating molecular similarity between small organic compounds. Instead of a linear representation like fingerprints, a more complex description, a feature tree, is calculated for a molecule. A feature tree represents hydrophobic fragments and functional groups of the molecule and the way these groups are linked together. Each node in the tree is labeled with a set of features representing chemical properties of the part of the molecule corresponding to the node. The comparison of feature trees is based on matching subtrees of two feature trees onto each other. Two algorithms for tackling the matching problem are described throughout this paper. On a dataset of about 1000 molecules, we demonstrate the ability of our approach to identify molecules belonging to the same class of inhibitors. With a second dataset of 58 molecules with known binding modes taken from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, we show that the matchings produced by our algorithms are compatible with the relative orientation of the molecules in the active site in 61% of the test cases. The average computation time for a pair comparison is about 50 ms on a current workstation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9834908     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008068904628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  A fast and efficient method for 2D and 3D molecular shape description.

Authors:  G W Bemis; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Molecular similarity based on DOCK-generated fingerprints.

Authors:  H Briem; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Time-efficient flexible superposition of medium-sized molecules.

Authors:  C Lemmen; T Lengauer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm.

Authors:  M Rarey; B Kramer; T Lengauer; G Klebe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  New molecular shape descriptors: application in database screening.

Authors:  A C Good; T J Ewing; D A Gschwend; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Different approaches toward an automatic structural alignment of drug molecules: applications to sterol mimics, thrombin and thermolysin inhibitors.

Authors:  G Klebe; T Mietzner; F Weber
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  New method for rapid characterization of molecular shapes: applications in drug design.

Authors:  R Nilakantan; N Bauman; R Venkataraghavan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb

9.  Searching for pharmacophoric patterns in databases of three-dimensional chemical structures.

Authors:  P Willett
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.137

10.  A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.686

  10 in total
  35 in total

1.  Similarity searching in large combinatorial chemistry spaces.

Authors:  M Rarey; M Stahl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints.

Authors:  Sally A Hindle; Matthias Rarey; Christian Buning; Thomas Lengaue
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The Compressed Feature Matrix--a novel descriptor for adaptive similarity search.

Authors:  S F Badreddin Abolmaali; Claude Ostermann; Andreas Zell
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Measuring CAMD technique performance: a virtual screening case study in the design of validation experiments.

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Mark A Hermsmeier; S A Hindle
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications.

Authors:  Ana G Maldonado; J P Doucet; Michel Petitjean; Bo-Tao Fan
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.943

6.  Ultrafast de novo docking combining pharmacophores and combinatorics.

Authors:  Marcus Gastreich; Markus Lilienthal; Hans Briem; Holger Claussen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Reverse fingerprinting, similarity searching by group fusion and fingerprint bit importance.

Authors:  Chris Williams
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.943

8.  A knowledge-based approach to generating diverse but energetically representative ensembles of ligand conformers.

Authors:  Roman J Dorfman; Karl M Smith; Brian B Masek; Robert D Clark
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Optimal assignment methods for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Andreas Jahn; Georg Hinselmann; Nikolas Fechner; Andreas Zell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  wwLigCSRre: a 3D ligand-based server for hit identification and optimization.

Authors:  O Sperandio; M Petitjean; P Tuffery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.