| Literature DB >> 31616390 |
Madangchanok Imchen1, Ranjith Kumavath1, Aline B M Vaz2, Aristóteles Góes-Neto2, Debmalya Barh2,3, Preetam Ghosh4, Natalia Kozyrovska5, Olga Podolich5, Vasco Azevedo6.
Abstract
Rice is a major staple food across the globe. Its growth and productivity is highly dependent on the rhizobiome where crosstalk takes place between plant and the microbial community. Such interactions lead to selective enrichment of plant beneficial microbes which ultimately defines the crop health and productivity. In this study, rhizobiome modulation is documented throughout the development of rice plant. Based on 16S rRNA gene affiliation at genus level, abundance, and diversity of plant growth promoting bacteria increased during the growth stages. The observed α diversity and rhizobiome complexity increased significantly (p < 0.05) during plantation. PCoA indicates that different geographical locations shared similar rhizobiome diversity but exerted differential enrichment (p < 0.001). Diversity of enriched genera represented a sigmoid curve and subsequently declined after harvest. A major proportion of dominant enriched genera (p < 0.05, abundance > 0.1%), based on 16S rRNA gene, were plant growth promoting bacteria that produces siderophore, indole-3-acetic acid, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, and antimicrobials. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens dominated throughout cultivation. Type I methanotrophs (n = 12) had higher diversity than type II methanotrophs (n = 6). However, the later had significantly higher abundance (p = 0.003). Strong enrichment pattern was also observed in type I methanotrophs being enriched during water logged stages. Ammonia oxidizing Archaea were several folds more abundant than ammonia oxidizing bacteria. K-strategists Nitrosospira and Nitrospira dominated ammonia and nitrite oxidizing bacteria, respectively. The study clarifies the modulation of rhizobiome according to the rice developmental stages, thereby opening up the possibilities of bio-fertilizer treatment based on each cultivation stages.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene amplicon metagenomics; Oryza sativa; environmental DNA; next generation sequencing; rhizobiome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31616390 PMCID: PMC6764247 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Description of study sites.
| Vadakara, Kerala | Pre-plow (kvp1) |
| Chemmattamvayal, Kerala | Pre-plow (kcp1) |
| Kheezmala, Kerala | Pre-plow (kkp1) |
| Dimapur, Nagaland | Vegetative (nl) |
| Rasipuran, Tamil Nadu | Vegetative (tn) |
| Ukhurl, Manipur | Vegetative (mn) |
| Burari, Delhi | Post-plow (dl) |
| Panvel, Maharashtra | Post-plow (mh) |
| Mysore, Karnataka | Post-plow (my) |
FIGURE 1(A) Venn diagram of cropped and uncropped microbiome shows a high similarity of abundance. (B) Genera with more than 10 folds enrichment in rhizobiome. (C,D) Number of nodes and edges for 0.5 and 0.05-jaccard distance, respectively. (E) 0.05 jaccard distance network complexity map.
Pairwise comparisons of alpha diversity between each stage.
| Post-plow | 1.00 | |||||
| Vegetative | 0.62 | 0.90 | ||||
| Reproductive | 0.90 | 0.33 | 1.00 | |||
| Ripening | 0.90 | 0.33 | 0.90 | 1.00 | ||
| Post harvest | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Cropped | 0.005 |
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices (PERMANOVA) of bulk and rhizosphere microbiome compared to cropping, growth stages and location.
| Cropped vs. Uncropped | 0.102 | 0.0002 | 0.102 | 0.0005 | 0.074 | 0.0004 | 0.083 | 0.0015 |
| Cultivation stages | 0.162 | 0.0193 | 0.162 | 0.0173 | 0.181 | 0.0174 | 0.162 | 0.0304 |
| Geographical location | 0.505 | 0.0003 | 0.505 | 0.0003 | 0.384 | 0.0006 | 0.478 | 0.0001 |
Significant differences in microbial community among the groups using ANOSIM.
| Pre-plow | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.33 | –0.22 | |
| Post-plow | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 0.5 | |
| Vegetative | 0.32 | 0.36 | –0.22 | –0.07 | 0.06 | |
| Reproductive | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.91 | 0.15 | –0.04 | |
| Ripening | 0.33 | 0.046 | 0.57 | 0.5 | 0.19 | |
| Post-harvest | 1 | 0.027 | 0.36 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
FIGURE 2PCoA rhizobiome analysis of different cultivation stages and location using (A) unweight unifrac shows clustering of cropped samples irrespective of location and cultivation stage. In contrast, (B) weight unifrac PCoA shows culturing majorly based on location implying that the diversity is relatively similar, but not abundance, among the samples during cropped stages.
FIGURE 3Growth stage-dependent selective enrichment (A) at genus level of the top 10 most abundant genera from each cultivation stage. (B) Enrichment and depletion on a larger time frame (cropped vs. uncropped). (C–I) Growth stage-dependent genus enrichment and depletion (p < 0.05). Blue color denotes enrichment, red color denotes depletion.
FIGURE 4Rhizobiome composition and diversity of (A) methanogens, (B) methanotrophs, (C) ammonia oxidizers, and (D) nitrite oxidizers in a stage wise manner shows differential enrichment within respective niche throughout the cultivation.
FIGURE 5Growth stage-dependent (A) richness, (B) Shannon, and (C) evenness represented in box plot.