Literature DB >> 17632144

The relationship between anxiety and time to treatment for patients with prostate cancer on surveillance.

David M Latini1, Stacey L Hart, Sara J Knight, Janet E Cowan, Phillip L Ross, Janeen Duchane, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about psychosocial factors affecting the decision to move from surveillance to active treatment in men with localized prostate cancer. We examined the impact of cancer anxiety on the decision to move from surveillance to treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from CaPSURE, a national observational prostate cancer registry. A total of 105 participants had localized disease, selected surveillance vs treatment and had at least 3 prostate specific antigen values available after baseline. Cancer anxiety was measured with a 3-item scale (alpha = 0.78). We calculated the rate of change in prostate specific antigen with time (prostate specific antigen velocity) and used the same formula to calculate the rate of change in cancer anxiety. We fit a Cox regression model to determine predictors of receiving treatment in the 3-year observation period, controlling for prostate specific antigen velocity, demographics and baseline clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: Prostate specific antigen velocity and the cancer anxiety change rate were significant independent predictors of treatment receipt (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.004, 1.035, each p <0.01). Men with higher prostate specific antigen velocity (1.51 ng/ml per year or greater) were significantly more likely to receive treatment than men with lower prostate specific antigen velocity (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.122, 9.016). The 2 velocity measures correlated only modestly (r = 0.29, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than being based only on clinical presentation and disease progression, decisions about treatment receipt for some men are influenced by cancer related anxiety. Men should be provided with more psychosocial support to perhaps delay treatment and the ensuing decrements in health related quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632144     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  66 in total

Review 1.  Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: an updated view.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A review of focal therapy techniques in prostate cancer: clinical results for high-intensity focused ultrasound and focal cryoablation.

Authors:  Colin T Iberti; Nihal Mohamed; Michael A Palese
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

3.  Self-reported health and survival in older patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nadia A Nabulsi; Ali Alobaidi; Brian Talon; Alemseged A Asfaw; Jifang Zhou; Lisa K Sharp; Karen Sweiss; Pritesh R Patel; Naomi Y Ko; Brian C-H Chiu; Gregory S Calip
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Emma Turner; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Effects of High Anxiety Scores on Surgical and Overall Treatment Plan in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Nathalie LeVasseur; Huaqi Li; Winson Cheung; Paula Myers; Elaine Mckevitt; Rebecca Warburton; Kaylie-Anne Willemsma; Adam Deruchie Tan; Stephen Chia; Christine Simmons
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-15

6.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: diversity of practice across Europe.

Authors:  A Azmi; R A Dillon; S Borghesi; M Dunne; R E Power; L Marignol; B D P O'Neill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  The effect of time between diagnosis and initiation of treatment on outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Luke H DeGraaff; Alexis J Platek; Austin J Iovoli; Kimberly E Wooten; Hassan Arshad; Vishal Gupta; Ryan P McSpadden; Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Wesley L Hicks; Mary E Platek; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Effects of High Anxiety Scores on Surgical and Overall Treatment Plan in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Nathalie LeVasseur; Huaqi Li; Winson Cheung; Paula Myers; Elaine Mckevitt; Rebecca Warburton; Kaylie-Anne Willemsma; Adam Deruchie Tan; Stephen Chia; Christine Simmons
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 9.  Enhancing active surveillance of prostate cancer: the potential of exercise medicine.

Authors:  Daniel A Galvão; Dennis R Taaffe; Nigel Spry; Robert A Gardiner; Renea Taylor; Gail P Risbridger; Mark Frydenberg; Michelle Hill; Suzanne K Chambers; Phillip Stricker; Tom Shannon; Dickon Hayne; Eva Zopf; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Prostate Cancer Prevention: Concepts and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Zachary Hamilton; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.