| Literature DB >> 31611679 |
Mohammed F Shaheen1,2, Dong Jin Joo1,3, Jeffrey J Ross4, Brett D Anderson5, Harvey S Chen1,2, Robert C Huebert6, Yi Li1, Bruce Amiot1, Anne Young5, Viviana Zlochiver5, Erek Nelson1,2, Taofic Mounajjed7, Allan B Dietz7, Gregory Michalak8, Benjamin G Steiner5, Dominique Seetapun Davidow5, Christopher R Paradise9, Andre J van Wijnen10,11, Vijay H Shah6, Mengfei Liu6, Scott L Nyberg12,13.
Abstract
Implanted bioengineered livers have not exceeded three days of continuous perfusion. Here we show that decellularized whole porcine livers revascularized with human umbilical vein endothelial cells and implanted heterotopically into immunosuppressed pigs whose spleens had been removed can sustain perfusion for up to 15 days. We identified peak glucose consumption rate as a main predictor of the patency of the revascularized bioengineered livers (rBELs). Heterotopic implantation of rBELs into pigs in the absence of anticoagulation therapy led to sustained perfusion for three days, followed by a pronounced immune responses directed against the human endothelial cells. A 10 day steroid-based immunosuppression protocol and a splenectomy at the time of rBEL implantation reduced the immune responses and resulted in continuous perfusion of the rBELs for over two weeks. We also show that the human endothelial cells in the perfused rBELs colonize the liver sinusoids and express sinusoidal endothelial markers similar to those in normal liver tissue. Revascularized liver scaffolds that can maintain blood perfusion at physiological pressures might eventually help to overcome the chronic shortage of transplantable human livers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31611679 PMCID: PMC7153989 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-019-0460-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biomed Eng ISSN: 2157-846X Impact factor: 25.671
Figure 1.Porcine liver decellularization and perfusion bioreactor system.
(a) Native porcine livers are cannulated on the PV, IVC and SVC, and decellularized by sequential perfusion with Triton X-100 and SDS solutions. (b-g) Representative photographs, H&E staining and Collagen I immunofluorescence of native (b-d) and decellularized (e-g) porcine livers. (h, i) Schematic (h) and photo (i) of perfusion bioreactor system comprised of a custom bioreactor and a pressure-dependent perfusion control system. The bioreactor includes a pressure transducer (PT) to monitor perfusion pressure, a gas exchange coil (GEC) to allow efficient gas exchange during media perfusion, a bubble trap (BT) to prevent the introduction of bubbles into the rBEL, a 0.22 μm filter air vent (AV), and three-way stopcocks (3W) to enable media exchange and sampling.
Figure 2.Analysis of rBEL culture kinetics and HUVEC phenotypic plasticity in decellularized liver matrix.
(a) HUVECs are expanded in 2D tissue culture flasks, harvested and seeded through the graft SVC, followed by the PV 24 hours later. (b) Representative CD31+ flow cytometry demonstrating a phenotypically pure HUVEC population immediately prior to graft seeding. (c) Plots of glucose consumption rates over time from independently seeded and cultured rBEL constructs (n=14). Peak glucose consumption rates correlated with total endothelial cell coverage as characterized by H&E staining (d-f) and anti-CD31 immunostaining (g-i). (j) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of CD31, LYVE1 and STAB2 mRNA levels in rBELs harvested at low (n=4), mid (n=4) and high (n=7) glucose consumption phases Data are plotted as fold change relative to HUVECs in 2D culture. Individual values represent biological replicates. Mean values ± standard deviation are shown. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA test from dCT values prior to fold-change normalization. (k-m) CD31 and LYVE-1 immunostaining from rBELs harvested at low, mid and high glucose consumption phases.(n) Principal component analysis of RNA-seq gene expression profiles from rBELs harvested at low (n=2 biological replicates) and high (n=6 biological replicates) glucose consumption phases. (o) Similarity matrix of BEL samples from (n) comparing low and high glucose consumption phase rBEL samples with respect to panel of known liver endothelial cell markers (input genes: F8, CD31, STAB2, LYVE1, CD14, VWF, ENG, ICAM1).(p) RNA-seq expression profiles for liver sinusoidal endothelial markers LYVE1, VWF, and ICAM1 in low (n=2) and high (n=6) glucose consumption phase rBEL samples. HUVECs (n=1) and primary human LSECs (n=1) cultured in 2D are included for comparison. Biological replicates are plotted along with the mean ± standard deviation. (q-t) TEM images from native liver (q) and rBEL (r-t) samples. Red arrows indicate fenestrae-like structures within endothelial cells.
Figure 3.In vitro and in vivo patency correlates with peak glucose consumption rate.
(a, c) Diagram and setup of the in vitro blood circuit used to evaluate rBEL patency. The circuit perfuses a rBEL with warm, heparinized whole porcine blood and is driven by a peristaltic pump controlled by a pressure-based custom control system. (b) Illustration of in vivo heterotopic liver implant model where the rBEL is anastomosed via the PV and IVC to the native PV and IVC. Partial flow was given to both the rBEL and the native liver by restricting flow to the native liver. (d-i) Representative images of the heterotopic liver implant including graft preparation, anastomosis and reperfusion. (j) Representative ultrasound images of an implanted rBEL demonstrating portal and hepatic veinous flow after 30 min. (k) Flow rates from in vitro (n=5) and in vivo (n=5) perfusion studies. Values from independent rBELs are plotted. Peak glucose consumption of >30 mg/h correlates with >100 mL/min of blood flow in vitro and in vivo.
Figure 4.Long term in vivo perfusion studies in the presence and absence of immunosuppression.
(a) In vivo implants were separated into two groups: no treatment and immunosuppression. The immunosuppression group received a methylprednisolone immunosuppression dose (I.D.) starting at 500 mg on Day 0 and was tapered over ten days. (b) 3D CT reconstruction after graft implantation showing the heterotopic position of the implanted graft below the native liver while demonstrating good vascular perfusion of the implanted graft. (c) Serial contrast enhanced CT images of the implanted bioengineered liver grafts over time. Grafts are highlighted with dotted lines. Yellow dotted lines delineate perfused graft with contrast in white. Red dotted lines reflect no parenchymal perfusion. (d) Quantification of graft perfusion reduction over time in untreated (n=4) and immunosuppressed (n=4) animals. (e) Cytotoxicity of pig sera from untreated (n=4) and immunosuppressed (n=4) animals incubated on in vitro HUVEC cultures following addition of unabsorbed rabbit complement.