| Literature DB >> 31608059 |
Alba Miranda-Ribera1,2, Maria Ennamorati1, Gloria Serena1,2, Murat Cetinbas3,4, Jinggang Lan1, Ruslan I Sadreyev3,5, Nitya Jain1,2, Alessio Fasano1,2, Maria Fiorentino1,2.
Abstract
The balanced interplay between epithelial barrier, immune system, and microbiota maintains gut homeostasis, while disruption of this interplay may lead to inflammation. Paracellular permeability is governed by intercellular tight-junctions (TJs). Zonulin is, to date, the only known physiological regulator of intestinal TJs. We used a zonulin transgenic mouse (Ztm) model characterized by increased small intestinal permeability to elucidate the role of a primary impaired gut barrier on microbiome composition and/or immune profile. Ztm exhibit an altered gene expression profile of TJs in the gut compared to wild-type mice (WT): Claudin-15, Claudin-5, Jam-3, and Myosin-1C are decreased in the male duodenum whereas Claudin-15, Claudin-7, and ZO-2 are reduced in the female colon. These results are compatible with loss of gut barrier function and are paralleled by an altered microbiota composition with reduced abundance of the genus Akkermansia, known to have positive effects on gut barrier integrity and strengthening, and an increased abundance of the Rikenella genus, associated to low-grade inflammatory conditions. Immune profile analysis shows a subtly skewed distribution of immune cell subsets toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype with more IL-17 producing adaptive and innate-like T cells in Ztm. Interestingly, microbiota "normalization" involving the transfer of WT microbiota into Ztm, did not rescue the altered immune profile. Our data suggest that a primary impaired gut barrier causing an uncontrolled trafficking of microbial products leads to a latent pro-inflammatory status, with a skewed microbiota composition and immune profile that, in the presence of an environmental trigger, as we have previously described (1), might promote the onset of overt inflammation and an increased risk of chronic disease.Entities:
Keywords: chronic inflammatory diseases; dysbiosis; gut permeability; immunity; microbial products trafficking; microbiota; tight-junctions; zonulin transgenic mouse
Year: 2019 PMID: 31608059 PMCID: PMC6761304 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
List of all primers and FASTA accession numbers of the genes analyzed by real time qPCR analysis.
| Claudin 1 | GGCTTCTCTGGGATGGATCG | CTTTGCGAAACGCAGGACAT | Barrier-forming | |
| Claudin 2 | CCGTGTTCTGCCAGGATTCTC | AGGAACCAGCGGCGAGTAG | Pore-forming | |
| Claudin 3 | CCTAGGAACTGTCCAAGCCG | CCCGTTTCATGGTTTGCCTG | Barrier-forming | |
| Claudin 4 | CGTAGCAACGACAAGCCCTA | TGTCCCCAGCAAGCAGTTAG | Barrier-forming | |
| Claudin 5 | GTTAAGGCACGGGTAGCACT | TACTTCTGTGACACCGGCAC | Barrier-forming | |
| Claudin 7 | GCATACTTTCTGGGGGCCA | TGAAGCGACACTCTCACAGC | Barrier-forming claudin | |
| Claudin 8 | AAGGTCTACGACTCCCTGCT | TTCACGTTCTCATCGTCCCC | Barrier-forming claudin | |
| Claudin 10 | CCCAGAATGGGCTACACATA | CCTTCTCCGCCTTGATACTT | Pore-forming claudin | |
| Claudin 12 | GAGCCGATGTGCTCCTGTT | GGAGGGCTTGAGCTGTATGG | Barrier-forming | |
| Claudin 15 | AGGCACACCTTATCTGGCAC | TGCCCCCTGAACAATCACAA | Pore-forming claudin | |
| INFγ | CAGCAACAGCAAGGCGAAA | CTGGACCTGTGGGTTGTTGAC | Pro-inflammatory cytokine | |
| IL6 | GTCCTTCCTACCCCAATTTCCA | CGCACTAGGTTTGCCGAGTA | Pro-inflammatory cytokine | |
| IL8 | ACTCAAGAATGGTCGCGAGG | GTGCCATCAGAGCAGTCTGT | Pro-inflammatory cytokine | |
| IL10 | TGGGTTGCCAAGCCTTATCG | TTCAGCTTCTCACCCAGGGA | Anti-inflammatory cytokine | |
| IL17 | TTTAACTCCCTTGGCGCAAAA | CTTTCCCTCCGCATTGACAC | Pro-inflammatory cytokine | |
| JAM3 | GCTGTGAGGTCGTTGCTCTA | AGTGGCACATCATTGCGGTA | Barrier-forming | |
| Myo1C | CCGATCACCCGAAGAACCAA | CGCCGGAGGTTCTCAATGAA | Scaffolding | |
| Occldn | CTGACTATGCGGAAAGAGTTGAC | CCAGAGGTGTTGACTTATAGAAAGAC | Barrier-forming | |
| TNFα | GATCGGTCCCCAAAGGGATG | TTTGCTACGACGTGGGCTAC | Pro-inflammatory cytokine | |
| TRIC | TGTGTGAAGCTGCCATCAGT | TTTGCCACGTAGTCAGGCAT | Barrier-forming | |
| Zonulin | Sturgeon et al. ( | GAATGTGAGGCAGATGACAG | GTGTTCACCCATTGCTTCTC | TJ modulator |
| ZO1 | AAGAAAAAGAATGCACAGAGTTGTT | GAAATCGTGCTGATGTGCCA | Scaffolding | |
| ZO2 | AGCTTGTAGTTCTGAGCCGC | CCGACACGGCAATTCCAAAT | Scaffolding | |
| ZO3 | GGCTGATTGTTTCCAGGCCC | CCAGAGACAGCTATGCCGAA | Scaffolding | |
| 18S | AGAAACGGCTACCACATCCA | CCCTCCAATGGATCCTCGTT | Ribosomal RNA |
All primers were designed in house using NIH's Primer Blast and acquired from Integrated DNA Technologies (USA).
Figure 1Tight-junctions gene expression profile in the intestine of Ztm. (A) Down regulated tight-junction genes in the duodenum Ztm males (n = 6–10). (B) Unaltered tight-junction profile in the duodenum of Ztm females (n = 7–12). (C) Increased CLDN-12 in the colon of Ztm males (n = 7). (D) Downregulation of tight junction genes in the colon of Ztm females (n = 8). mRNA expression was analyzed by qPCR, normalized to WT, and expressed as fold regulation. Statistical analysis was performed by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test comparing each gene to its WT counterpart. *p < 0.05.
Figure 2Pro-inflammatory cytokines gene expression profile in Ztm intestine: A) Down-regulated IL-6 in the jejunum of Ztm males (n = 13). B) Pro-inflammatory cytokines profile in and g the jejunum of Ztm females (n = 10). C) Down-regulated IFN up-regulated IL-6 in the colon Ztm males (n = 7). D) Unaltered Pro-inflammatory cytokines profile in the colon of Ztm females (n = 8). mRNA expression was analyzed by qPCR, normalized to WT, and expressed as fold regulation. Statistical analysis was performed by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test comparing each gene to its WT counterpart. *p < 0.05.
(A) List of all genes analyzed by real time PCR in the duodenum, jejunum, and colon of adult mice (n = 6–12).
| CLDN 1 | 0.02 | ns | 1.43 | ns | – | – | – | – | 2.19 | ns | 1.07 | ns |
| CLDN 2 | 0.48 | ns | 0.93 | ns | 0.99 | ns | 1.22 | ns | 1.50 | ns | 1.32 | ns |
| CLDN 3 | 0.60 | ns | 1.37 | ns | 1.56 | ns | 1.17 | ns | 0.72 | ns | 0.74 | ns |
| CLDN 4 | 0.37 | ns | 1.02 | ns | 0.90 | ns | 1.13 | ns | 0.83 | ns | 0.73 | ns |
| CLDN 5 | 0.51 | 1.38 | ns | 1.22 | ns | 1.17 | ns | 1.30 | ns | 0.87 | ns | |
| CLDN 7 | 0.27 | ns | 0.89 | ns | 0.92 | ns | 1.13 | ns | 0.59 | ns | 0.55 | |
| CLDN 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.83 | ns | 1.45 | ns |
| CLDN 10 | 2.08 | ns | 1.55 | ns | 1.20 | ns | 0.94 | ns | 1.24 | ns | 1.28 | ns |
| CLDN 12 | 0.52 | ns | 0.95 | ns | 1.00 | ns | 1.14 | ns | 5.40 | 1.06 | ns | |
| CLDN 15 | 0.23 | 1.86 | ns | 1.65 | ns | 0.89 | ns | 0.66 | ns | 0.52 | ||
| INFγ | bdl | – | bdl | – | 1.89 | ns | 1.37 | ns | 0.41 | 0.82 | ns | |
| IL6 | bdl | – | 1.27 | ns | 0.46 | 0.54 | ns | 6.66 | 1.13 | ns | ||
| IL8 | 0.41 | ns | 2.50 | ns | 1.11 | ns | 0.87 | ns | 1.19 | ns | 1.08 | ns |
| IL10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.07 | ns | 1.04 | ns |
| IL17 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.55 | ns | bdl | - |
| JAM3 | 0.45 | 0.93 | ns | 0.97 | ns | 0.99 | ns | 1.30 | ns | 0.89 | ns | |
| Myo1C | 0.39 | 1.09 | ns | – | – | – | – | 0.71 | ns | 0.82 | ns | |
| Occldn | 0.75 | ns | 1.01 | ns | – | – | – | – | 1.17 | ns | 0.63 | ns |
| TNFα | 0.65 | ns | 2.69 | ns | 1.04 | ns | 1.02 | ns | 0.67 | ns | 0.85 | ns |
| TRIC | 0.53 | ns | 1.67 | ns | – | – | – | – | 1.76 | ns | 1.00 | ns |
| ZO1 | 1.06 | ns | 1.47 | ns | 1.10 | ns | 0.76 | ns | 1.20 | ns | 0.78 | ns |
| ZO2 | 0.47 | ns | 1.26 | ns | 0.85 | ns | 1.82 | ns | 0.99 | ns | 0.67 | |
| ZO3 | – | – | – | – | 1.09 | ns | 0.99 | ns | 1.45 | ns | 1.16 | ns |
| zonulin | 17.2 | 1.25 | 16.3 | 0.70 | 14.2 | 2.37 | 15.5 | 1.13 | 14.5 | 1.02 | 15.8 | 1.75 |
Expressed as Fold Change relative to same gene expression in the WT (FC, bdl = below detection level), statistics calculated with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test (ns = non-significant, significant p-values provided in bold) comparing gene expression from the Ztm to its WT counterpart. .
Figure 3Baseline dysbiosis in Ztm gut microbiota. Stools from 15 WT mice (WT males n = 6, WT females n = 9) and 17 Ztm (Ztm males n = 7, Ztm females n = 10) were analyzed. (A) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Jaccard distances for Ztm (n = 17) and WT (n = 15) mice show distinct clustering between Ztm and WT. No significant differences between males and females within each group were detected. (B) Microbiota composition at phylum level. WT (n = 15), Ztm (n = 17). Males and females within each group were analyzed together. Absence of Verrucomicrobia and Cyanobacteria in the Ztm is evident. (C) Volcano plot showing the statistical differences between Ztm and WT at genus level. In green overrepresented genus in WT mice, in red overrepresented genus in Ztm. Differential abundance analysis of OTUs was performed using ANCOM. Statistical significance was tested by the Kruskal-Wallis of abundance differences, with the multiple testing corrections using Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) set at 0.05.
Figure 4Microbiota analysis of Ztm mice with and without bedding transfer. Stools recovered from the colon of both male and female pups were analyzed as described in the material and methods. Stools were collected at weaning. ZtmbWT represent pups that were subjected to bedding transfer from WT. Bedding transfer was carried out twice a week since birth. (A) Shannon Index, expression of alpha diversity (variation/complexity of the microbiome within the group). WT n = 21, Ztm n = 13, ZtmbWT n = 5. WT and Ztm have a significantly different (q = 0.007) microbiota diversity, whereas no statistical difference is observed between WT and ZtmbWT. (B) Microbiota composition at phylum level. Successful engraftment of Verrucomicrobia and Cyanobacteria from WT to ZtmbWT following bedding transfer. (C) Principal component Analysis (PCA) of Jaccard distances. ZtmbWT (red) cluster with WT (green) and separately from Ztm (in blue). Differential abundance analysis of OTUs was performed using ANCOM. Statistical significance was tested by the Kruskal-Wallis of abundance differences, with the multiple testing corrections using Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) set at 0.05. **q < 0.01.
Figure 5Distribution of immune cell subsets in colon and SI of WT and Ztm/ZtmbWT mice. Lamina propria and epithelial compartment lymphocytes from the colon (WT n = 6; Ztm n = 4; ZtmbWT n = 6) and small intestine (SI) (WT n = 4; Ztm n = 4; ZtmbWT n = 4) of 35 days old mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Pie chart representation of distribution of indicated IL7R+ subsets in colon (Top row) and small intestine (SI) (Bottom Row). (B) (Top row) Representative flow cytometry dot plots show expression of IL-7R (x-axis) and RORγt (y-axis) in lymphocytes from the SI. (Bottom Row) Pie chart representation of distribution of indicated IL7R+RORγt+ subsets in SI. (C) Summary of distribution of immune cell subsets in colon and SI. Mean, SD, and p-values are indicated. Unpaired parametric t-test was used for comparisons between the 2 groups with significance set at p < 0.05.
Figure 6Distribution of immune cell subsets in spleen of WT and Ztm/ZtmbWT mice: single cell preparations from the spleen of 28–35 days old WT (n = 6), Ztm (n = 3), and ZtmbWT (n = 8) mice analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Total splenic cellularity. (B) Vertical scatter plots show frequency of IL7R+TCRβ+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (C) (Left) Representative flow cytometry dot plots show expression of CD25 (x-axis) and RORγt (y-axis) on CD4+ T cells. (Right) Vertical scatter plots show frequency and cell numbers of CD4+CD25+ cells, CD4+CD25+RORγt+ cells, and CD4+RORγt+ Th17 cells. (D) (Left) Representative flow cytometry dot plots show expression of (Top row) mCD1d-PBS57 tetramer (x-axis) and TCRβ (y-axis) on IL7R+ cells and (Bottom row) RORγt (x-axis) and PLZF (y-axis) on mCD1d-PBS57 tetramer+ TCRβ+ iNKT cells. (Right) Vertical scatter plots show frequency and cell numbers of iNKT cells and RORγt+ NKT17 cells. (E) (Left) Representative flow cytometry dot plots show expression of δ-TCR (x-axis) and RORγt (y-axis) on IL7R+ cells. (Right) Vertical scatter plots show frequency and cell numbers of γδ T cells and RORγt+ γδ-T17 cells. (F) (Left) Representative flow cytometry dot plots show expression of CD11c (x-axis) and Siglec-H (y-axis) on live cells (Red cells: CD11cloSiglec-H+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells or PDCs; Blue cells: CD11chiSiglec-Hneg conventional dendritic cells or CDCs). (Right) Vertical scatter plots show frequency and cell numbers of CDCs and PDCs. Data in (A–F) are representative of 3 independent experiments. Error bars are SEMs. Unpaired parametric t-test was used for comparisons between 2 groups with significance set at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.