Andrew D Delgado1,2, Miguel X Escalon1, Thomas N Bryce1, William Weinrauch1, Stephanie J Suarez3, Allan J Kozlowski4,5. 1. Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA. 2. The Graduate School, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA. 3. Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Services (STARS), Northwell Health, East Meadow, New York, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA. 5. John F. Butzer Center for Research & Innovation, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
Context/objective: Information on the safety and feasibility of lower extremity powered exoskeletons for persons with acute/sub-acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is limited. Understanding the safety and feasibility of employing powered exoskeletons in acute/sub-acute (<6 months post injury) at a SCI acute inpatient rehabilitation (SCI-AIR) facility could guide clinical practice and provide a basis for larger clinical trials on efficacy and effectiveness. Design: Single group observational study. Setting: SCI-AIR. Participants: Participants (n = 12; age: 28-71 years; 58% AIS D; 58% male) with neurological levels of injuries ranging from C2 to L3. Interventions: Up to 90 min of exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training was provided up to three times per week during SCI-AIR. Outcome measures: Safety of device use during inpatient locomotor training was quantified as the number of adverse events (AE) per device exposure hour. Feasibility of device use was defined in terms of protocol compliance, intensity, and proficiency. Results: Concerning safety, symptomatic hypotension was the most common AE reported at 111-events/exoskeleton-hours. Protocol compliance had a mean (SD) of 54% (30%). For intensity, 77% of participants incorporated variable assistance into at least 1 walking session; 70% of participants' sessions were completed with a higher RPE than the physical therapist. In proficiency, 58% achieved at least minimal assistance when walking with the device. Conclusion: Exoskeleton training in SCI-AIR can be safe and feasible for newly injured individuals with SCI who have clinically defined ambulatory goals. Nonetheless, sufficient controls to minimize risks for AEs, such as hypotensive events, are required.
Context/objective: Information on the safety and feasibility of lower extremity powered exoskeletons for persons with acute/sub-acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is limited. Understanding the safety and feasibility of employing powered exoskeletons in acute/sub-acute (<6 months post injury) at a SCI acute inpatient rehabilitation (SCI-AIR) facility could guide clinical practice and provide a basis for larger clinical trials on efficacy and effectiveness. Design: Single group observational study. Setting: SCI-AIR. Participants: Participants (n = 12; age: 28-71 years; 58% AIS D; 58% male) with neurological levels of injuries ranging from C2 to L3. Interventions: Up to 90 min of exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training was provided up to three times per week during SCI-AIR. Outcome measures: Safety of device use during inpatient locomotor training was quantified as the number of adverse events (AE) per device exposure hour. Feasibility of device use was defined in terms of protocol compliance, intensity, and proficiency. Results: Concerning safety, symptomatic hypotension was the most common AE reported at 111-events/exoskeleton-hours. Protocol compliance had a mean (SD) of 54% (30%). For intensity, 77% of participants incorporated variable assistance into at least 1 walking session; 70% of participants' sessions were completed with a higher RPE than the physical therapist. In proficiency, 58% achieved at least minimal assistance when walking with the device. Conclusion: Exoskeleton training in SCI-AIR can be safe and feasible for newly injured individuals with SCI who have clinically defined ambulatory goals. Nonetheless, sufficient controls to minimize risks for AEs, such as hypotensive events, are required.
Entities:
Keywords:
Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Physical therapy modalities; Robotics; Spinal cord injuries; Walking
Authors: Lora M Giangregorio; Colin E Webber; Stuart M Phillips; Audrey L Hicks; B Catherine Craven; Joanne M Bugaresti; Neil McCartney Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Oliver Jansen; Dennis Grasmuecke; Renate C Meindl; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Schwenkreis; Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser; Martin Wessling; Thomas A Schildhauer; Christian Fisahn; Mirko Aach Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Pierre Asselin; Steven Knezevic; Stephen Kornfeld; Christopher Cirnigliaro; Irina Agranova-Breyter; William A Bauman; Ann M Spungen Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2015
Authors: Hyeon Seong Kim; Jae Hyeon Park; Ho Seok Lee; Jae Young Lee; Ji Won Jung; Si Bog Park; Dong Jin Hyun; Sangin Park; JuYoung Yoon; Hyunseop Lim; Yun Young Choi; Mi Jung Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 2.153