Literature DB >> 31602298

First draft genome assembly and identification of SNPs from hilsa shad ( Tenualosa ilisha) of the Bay of Bengal.

Md Bazlur Rahman Mollah1, Mohd Golam Quader Khan2, Md Shahidul Islam3, Md Samsul Alam2.   

Abstract

Background: Hilsa shad ( Tenualosa ilisha), a widely distributed migratory fish, contributes substantially to the economy of Bangladesh. The harvest of hilsa from inland waters has been fluctuating due to anthropological and climate change-induced degradation of the riverine habitats.  The whole genome sequence of this valuable fish could provide genomic tools for sustainable harvest, conservation and productivity cycle maintenance. Here, we report the first draft genome of  T. ilisha from the Bay of Bengal, the largest reservoir of the migratory fish.
Methods: A live specimen of T. ilisha was collected from the Bay of Bengal. The whole genome sequencing was performed by the Illumina HiSeqX platform (2 × 150 paired end configuration). We assembled the short reads using SOAPdenovo2 genome assembler and predicted protein coding genes by AUGUSTUS. The completeness of the T. ilisha genome assembly was evaluated by BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs). We identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by calling them directly from unassembled sequence reads using discoSnp++.
Results: We assembled the draft genome of 710.28 Mb having an N50 scaffold length of 64157 bp and GC content of 42.95%. A total of 37,450 protein coding genes were predicted of which 29,339 (78.34%) were annotated with other vertebrate genomes. We also identified 792,939 isolated SNPs with transversion:transition ratio of 1:1.8. The BUSCO evaluation showed 78.1% completeness of this genome. Conclusions: The genomic data generated in this study could be used as a reference to identify genes associated with physiological and ecological adaptations, population connectivity, and migration behaviour of this biologically and economically important anadromous fish species of the Clupeidae family. Copyright:
© 2019 Mollah MBR et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bay of Bengal; Hilsa; SNP; anadromous; whole genome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31602298      PMCID: PMC6774053          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18325.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


Introduction

Hilsa shad ( Tenualosa ilisha) is a migratory fish of the Clupeidae family. It is distributed from the South China Sea and through the Bay of Bengal to the Persian Gulf. The riverine habitats of this fish include the Padma, Jamuna, Meghna, Karnaphuli and the coastal rivers of Bangladesh, the Tigris and Euphrates of Iran and Iraq, the Indus of Pakistan, the rivers of Eastern and Western India and the Irrawaddy of Myanmar ( Freyhof, 2014; Pillay & Rosa, 1963). Ecologically, three different types of hilsa shad have been recognized in Bangladesh waters such as anadromous, potamodromous and marine ( Milton, 2010). Hilsa is the most popular and economically important food fish in Bangladesh, contributing 12% of the total fish production and 1.15% of GDP. Of its world catch, 60% amounting to 0.5 million metric tons, comes from Bangladesh ( DoF, 2018). Though the overall production of hilsa increased over the years, gross decline in productions were evident from inland waters. A number of factors such as overexploitation, siltation in river beds, decrease in water flow from upstream and fragmentation of the rivers are attributed to this fluctuation in productivity ( Ahsan ). To enhance hilsa production, programs like the establishment of sanctuaries, restrictions on the use of fishing equipment and a ban on fishing in certain periods of the year to protect parent and juvenile fish have been initiated. It is, however, very important that the management activities be matched with the biological features of the fish for their effectiveness. Inconclusive information about the management units and the level of connectivity amongst them is considered as the major constraint in formulating appropriate hilsa management plans. There are controversies regarding the number of hilsa stocks in Bangladesh waters. Studies involving morphological and genetic analyses using allozyme, Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and mtDNA-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers proved to be insufficient in resolving the stock disputes of this species ( Ahmed ; Mazumder & Alam, 2009; Salini ). DNA markers derived from whole genome sequencing are more efficient to define management units, quantify the extent of adaptive divergence and connectivity among stocks, and to perform mixed-stock analysis ( Martinez Barrio ; Figueras ; Machado ). Single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers allow whole genome coverage and high levels of automation. Conventionally, SNP markers are developed by comparing nucleotide sequences with a reference genome. Recent advancement in generating SNPs from reference-free whole genome sequences accelerated identification of SNPs from non-model organisms. Although hilsa is a very important fish biologically and economically, it lacks a reference genome and genomic resources, imposing a severe bottleneck to understand its physiological and ecological requirements. Therefore, we performed whole genome sequencing ( Mollah ), constructed a draft genome assembly and identified SNPs from T. ilisha of the Bay of Bengal.

Methods

Sample collection and genomic DNA extraction

We captured ten T. ilisha specimens from the seashore of the Bay of Bengal (21.981753 N 90.305556 E) ( Figure 1). All efforts were made to ameliorate harm to the fish by using a seine net of appropriate mesh size (20 mm) to avoid any physical injuries and suffocation. Due to the nature of this species, the fish died immediately after taking them out of the water. Dorsal and caudal fin tissues were immediately clipped on board from a dead female fish (560.42g) and preserved in 96% ethanol. The fish were handled according to the guidelines of the Animal Welfare and Ethical Committee (AWEC) of Bangladesh Agricultural University. The genomic DNA was isolated using the standard phenol:chlorofom:isoamyl alcohol method ( Sambrook & Russell, 2001). DNA purity was evaluated using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat # ND-2000) and 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was quantified using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. # Q32851) and used to systematically generate the whole genome sequence data ( Figure 2).
Figure 1.

The experimental fish and its collection site.

Photograph of a T. ilisha specimen ( a) and a map of Bangladesh showing the sampling site (21.981753 N 90.305556 E) ( b).

Figure 2.

Methodology outline.

Schematic diagram illustrating the methodology of whole genome sequencing, de novo assembly and identification of SNPs in T. ilisha from the Bay of Bengal.

The experimental fish and its collection site.

Photograph of a T. ilisha specimen ( a) and a map of Bangladesh showing the sampling site (21.981753 N 90.305556 E) ( b).

Methodology outline.

Schematic diagram illustrating the methodology of whole genome sequencing, de novo assembly and identification of SNPs in T. ilisha from the Bay of Bengal.

PCR-free DNA library preparation and sequencing

For sequencing, a PCR-free DNA library was prepared using the Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-free Library Preparation Kit (Cat. # 20015963), following the manufacturer’s recommendations (Illumina, CA, USA). The library was fragmented, size was selected following the 350 bp insert size scheme and validated using TapeStation (2100 Bioanalyzer,Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The DNA library was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer as well as by real time PCR (ABI 7500, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Cat. # KK4824) following the manufacturer’s standard protocol with the primer pair Primer 1: 5'-AAT GAT ACG GCG ACC ACC GA-3' Primer 2: 5'-CAA GCA GAA GAC GGC ATA CGA-3'. The PCR condition was followed as initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles (denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing/extension/data acquisition at 60°C for 45 sec) and melt curve analysis at 65 – 95°C. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeqX instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced using a 2× 150 paired-end (PE) configuration (GENEWIZ, LLC. South Plainfield, NJ, USA).

DNA sequence processing and genome size estimation

The raw reads were filtered based on quality and length using Trimmomatic-0.32 ( Bolger ) after evaluating with FastQC v. 0.11.8 ( Andrews, 2018) as follows: i) removal of adaptor sequences; ii) removal of read pairs from either ends when the base quality was <20; iii) trimming low quality fragments at both ends of the reads within a window size of 4 bp and an average quality threshold of 15; iv) removal of read pairs having <75 nucleotides. Jellyfish v. 2.2.6 ( Marçais & Kingsford, 2011) was used to obtain a separate frequency distribution of three different high occurring kmers (21, 31 and 33) in the raw HiSeq sequence reads, and the histograms were uploaded to GenomeScope for estimating genome size, repeat content, repeat length, unique length and heterozygosity following kmer-based statistical approaches ( Vurture ).

Genome assembly, genome quality evaluation and annotation

We assembled the short reads using SOAPdenovo2 genome assembler ( Luo ), developed specifically for use with next-generation short-read sequences. SOAPdenovo2 uses the de Bruijn graph algorithm. We tested several kmers to assemble the T. ilisha genome and finally selected the assembly with a kmer of 33. The completeness of the T. ilisha genome assembly was evaluated by BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs) ( Simão ). For BUSCO analysis (-m geno –sp zebrafish settings), the genome was searched against the Actinopterygii database (actinopterygii_odb9), which was constructed from 20 fish species consisting of 4584 orthologs. AUGUSTUS ab initio gene prediction was performed to predict protein-coding genes. The protein sequences of fish species and other vertebrates, including Rhincodon typus, Cyprinus carpio, Takifugu rubripes, Salmo salar, Mus musculus and Homo sapiens, were downloaded from the NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database ( Table 3) and aligned against the T. ilisha genome using BLASTP ( Altschul ).
Table 3.

Significant matches (blastp e = 0.001) of T. ilisha genes with other vertebrates.

SpeciesNo. of matches% match
Rhincodon typus 2706272.26
Cyprinus carpio 2837375.76
Takifugu rubripes 2832575.63
Salmo salar 2933978.34
Mus musculus 2648070.71
Homo sapiens 2749773.42

Reference-free detection of isolated SNPs

We used discoSnp++ v2.2.10 ( Uricaru ) with default parameters for reference-free detection of isolated SNPs (SNPs not flanked by other SNPs, Indels or structural variants) by calling SNPs directly from sequence reads without a reference genome. This method identifies isolated SNPs from the sequences of two homologous chromosomes within a single individual.

Results and discussion

The estimated haploid genome size of T. ilisha ranged from 649.48 to 660.73 Mb. We observed heterozygosity and a repeat peak ( Figure 3), with an estimated heterozygosity of 0.579 to 0.660% and repeats of 8.30 to 13.57% ( Table 1). We assembled the draft genome of 710.28 Mb, having an N50 scaffold length of 64157 bp and a GC content of ~43% ( Table 2). The whole genome assembly of a notable Clupeid fish, the Atlantic herring, based on short reads (170 bp to 20 kb inserts) was 808 Mb with a scaffold N50 of 1.84 Mb and GC content of 44%, with repetitive elements making up 31% of the assembly ( Martinez Barrio ). The genome size of another important Clupeid fish, the European sardine ( Sardina pilchardus), was estimated to be 655-850 Mb ( Machado ) and 935-950Mb ( Louro ).
Figure 3.

GenomeScope kmer profile plot of the T. ilisha.

Dataset show the fit of the GenomeScope model (black) based on 33-kmers in Illumina HiSeq sequence reads, max kmer coverage at 300× ( a) and 10000× coverage ( b).

Table 1.

Properties of T. ilisha genome estimated at three different kmers [1].

PropertiesKmer 21Kmer 31Kmer 33
minmaxminmaxminmax
Genome Haploid Length (bp)649,475,766649,949,877659,441,333659,890,585660,289,984660,728,342
Heterozygosity (%)0.6540.6600.5900.5940.5790.583
Genome Repeat Length (bp)88,141,62188,205,96357,904,06357,943,51054,791,37154,827,747
Genome Unique Length (bp)561,334,145561,743,914601,537,270601,947,074605,498,612605,900,595
Read Error Rate (%)0.5270.4770.468

1Kmers are unique subsequences of a sequence of length k. The estimated genome size varies according to kmer value. The estimated haploid genome lengths obtained from kmer 31 and kmer 33 are very close.

Table 2.

Contig and scaffold properties of T. ilisha genome.

ContigScaffold
ParametersValue%ParametersValue
Read pairs769,262,291-Scaffold Number100181
Contig Number1724390-Mean Scaffold size7090
Mean Contig Size378-Longest Scaffold832708
Median Contig Size209-Shortest Scaffold200
Longest Contig27277-N10254367
Shortest Contig100-N30118059
Contig >100bp 170438998.84N5064157
Contig >500bp33542219.45N7026438
Contig >1K1213797.04N904991
Contig >10K580.00N count96164104
Contig N50 (bp)594-Assembled Genome Size (bp)710279582
G+C content %-43.01G+C content (%)42.95

GenomeScope kmer profile plot of the T. ilisha.

Dataset show the fit of the GenomeScope model (black) based on 33-kmers in Illumina HiSeq sequence reads, max kmer coverage at 300× ( a) and 10000× coverage ( b). 1Kmers are unique subsequences of a sequence of length k. The estimated genome size varies according to kmer value. The estimated haploid genome lengths obtained from kmer 31 and kmer 33 are very close. The assembled T. ilisha genome was searched for BUSCO analysis against the Actinopterygii database, consisting of 4,584 orthologs constructed from 20 fish species. We found 3,578 complete (C: 78.1%), 3,456 complete and single-copy (S: 75.4%), 122 complete and duplicated (D: 2.7%), 351 fragmented (F: 7.7%) and 655 missing BUSCOs (M: 14.2%). These results suggest higher completeness of the T. ilisha genome assembly of the Bay of Bengal. The BUSCO analysis of its closely related species, the European sardine, showed 84% genome completeness ( Louro ). The completeness of genome assembly may depend on the sequencing platform used. For example, 92.3% BUSCO completeness was obtained using only the Illumina reads compared to 94.2% completeness from the Illumina + Nanopore reads in the Murray cod ( Maccullochella peelii) ( Austin ). AUGUSTUS ab initio gene prediction was performed to predict protein-coding genes. We found 37,450 protein coding genes from the assembled T. ilisha genome ( Mollah ). To annotate the proteins, predicted amino acid sequences of T. ilisha were aligned against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database of other vertebrates ( Table 3) using BLASTP. Among the five vertebrate genomes compared, a minimum of 70.71% genes of T. ilisha was annotated by Mus musculus and a maximum of 78.34% by Salmo salar ( Table 3). The numbers of predicted protein coding genes in two other important Clupeids, the Atlantic herring and the European sardine, were 23,336 and 29,408, respectively ( Martinez Barrio ; Louro ). We identified a total of 792,939 isolated SNPs in T. ilisha genome, of which 510,251 were transitions and 282,688 were transversions ( Table 4) ( Mollah ). We also detected 155,574 indels ranging in sizes from 1 to 60 nucleotides ( Figure 4). A total of 5.3 million raw SNPs in the Atlantic stock and 5.2 million SNPs in the Baltic stock of the Atlantic herring were detected by Feng . In contrast, Louro identified a total of 2.3 million filtered heterozygous SNPs in the European sardine. Since there is no high quality reference genome available in T. ilisha, we used discoSNP++ because of its nobility and efficiency in detection of SNPs from unassembled genome sequences. Uricaru genotyped 384 SNPs out of a total of 312,088 discoSNP++ predicted SNPs, of which 368 (95.8%) were accurately validated in the tick Ixodes ricinus.
Table 4.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and Indels in the T. ilisha genome.

SNPs / indelsTypeNumber%
Total SNPs-792939100
TransitionsA>G25620932.31
C>T25404232.04
TransversionsA>C759129.57
A>T784699.90
C>G558107.04
G>T724979.14
Transition : Transversion1.8 : 1
Number of Indels155574
Figure 4.

Distribution of Indels in the T. ilisha genome.

The indel values ranged from 1 to 60 nucleotides. It shows that the frequency of indels decreased with the increase in size.

Distribution of Indels in the T. ilisha genome.

The indel values ranged from 1 to 60 nucleotides. It shows that the frequency of indels decreased with the increase in size.

Conclusions

We report here the first de novo genome of T. ilisha from the Bay of Bengal. The assembled genome can be used as a reference for genetic studies of T. ilisha and related species. The SNPs generated could provide a valuable resource for resolving stock disputes and phylogenetic or adaptation investigation of the Clupeidae family.

Data Availability

Underlying data

Tenualosa ilisha collected from Bay of Bengal, Accession number SAMN07556897: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/?term=SAMN07556897 Tenualosa ilisha whole genome sequencing and assembly, Accession number SRP116260: https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?study=SRP116260 Tenualosa ilisha whole genome shotgun sequencing project, Accession number SCED00000000: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/SCED00000000 Zenodo: Amino acid sequences of the proteins predicted from the whole genome of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) of the Bay of Bengal. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2539223 ( Mollah ) Zenodo: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) identified from the whole genome sequences of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) of the Bay of Bengal. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2538155 ( Mollah ) Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Authors constructed a draft genome assembly by whole genome sequencing and identified SNPs from Tenualosa ilisha of the Bay of Bengal. This paper is well written, and that the analysis methods are generally appropriate. I have several suggestions to improve this manuscript as follows: Authors described that “We captured ten T. ilisha specimens from the seashore of the Bay of Bengal” in the Method section. But it is confusing because one individual was used finally in this study. Please revise this point. Authors said that three different ecological types of hilsa shad have been recognized in Bangladesh. What kind of ecotype is the individual used for genome assembly expected to have? This information may be important for future studies focusing genomic bases of the ecotype divergence. Authors described that “These results suggest higher completeness of the T. ilisha genome assembly of the Bay of Bengal.” It is a difficult problem whether it is higher completeness or not, but it seems that there are too many missing genes to say higher completeness. SNP typing was performed with a reference-free method. However, I think that it would be better to detect SNP using the reference constructed newly in this study (mapping and SNP calling by samtools etc). The SNP information (e.g. vcf file) based on the constructed reference genome should be useful for readers. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Overall, the manuscript was well written and contains all relevant information in accordance with its scope. Probably, it would be better if Table 3 is being presented in a figure form (e.g. Venn diagram), showing overlapping regions of genes between species. A linkage map (e.g using zebrafish as reference genome) and gene synteny analyses would be another interesting aspect that can be included. It would be more interesting if the genome of male and female of this species can be compared and analysed, since the fish is known as protandrous hermaphrodite. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. The authors provide a new reference genome for the hilsa shad fish of significant commercial importance in the Bay of Bengal. The methods they use are standard and the resulting completeness analysis by BUSCO showed approximately 78% of core genes present. While it would be ideal to have added libraries for scaffolding the assembly (reads from 5-20kb inserts, or 10X Genomics reads, or Pacific Bioscience), this initial assembly will certainly allow some general comparisons and the building of genomic resources to better study the fish. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
  15 in total

1.  The draft genome of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) provides insights into its evolution and vegetarian adaptation.

Authors:  Yaping Wang; Ying Lu; Yong Zhang; Zemin Ning; Yan Li; Qiang Zhao; Hengyun Lu; Rong Huang; Xiaoqin Xia; Qi Feng; Xufang Liang; Kunyan Liu; Lei Zhang; Tingting Lu; Tao Huang; Danlin Fan; Qijun Weng; Chuanrang Zhu; Yiqi Lu; Wenjun Li; Ziruo Wen; Congcong Zhou; Qilin Tian; Xiaojun Kang; Mijuan Shi; Wanting Zhang; Songhun Jang; Fukuan Du; Shan He; Lanjie Liao; Yongming Li; Bin Gui; Huihui He; Zhen Ning; Cheng Yang; Libo He; Lifei Luo; Rui Yang; Qiong Luo; Xiaochun Liu; Shuisheng Li; Wen Huang; Ling Xiao; Haoran Lin; Bin Han; Zuoyan Zhu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads.

Authors:  Gregory W Vurture; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Maria Nattestad; Charles J Underwood; Han Fang; James Gurtowski; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  High levels of genetic variability and differentiation in hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Clupeidae, Clupeiformes) populations revealed by PCR-RFLP analysis of the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region.

Authors:  Sabuj Kanti Mazumder; Md Samsul Alam
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.771

5.  De novo genome assembly and annotation of Australia's largest freshwater fish, the Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii), from Illumina and Nanopore sequencing read.

Authors:  Christopher M Austin; Mun Hua Tan; Katherine A Harrisson; Yin Peng Lee; Laurence J Croft; Paul Sunnucks; Alexandra Pavlova; Han Ming Gan
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  A haplotype-resolved draft genome of the European sardine (Sardina pilchardus).

Authors:  Bruno Louro; Gianluca De Moro; Carlos Garcia; Cymon J Cox; Ana Veríssimo; Stephen J Sabatino; António M Santos; Adelino V M Canário
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The genetic basis for ecological adaptation of the Atlantic herring revealed by genome sequencing.

Authors:  Alvaro Martinez Barrio; Sangeet Lamichhaney; Guangyi Fan; Nima Rafati; Mats Pettersson; He Zhang; Jacques Dainat; Diana Ekman; Marc Höppner; Patric Jern; Marcel Martin; Björn Nystedt; Xin Liu; Wenbin Chen; Xinming Liang; Chengcheng Shi; Yuanyuan Fu; Kailong Ma; Xiao Zhan; Chungang Feng; Ulla Gustafson; Carl-Johan Rubin; Markus Sällman Almén; Martina Blass; Michele Casini; Arild Folkvord; Linda Laikre; Nils Ryman; Simon Ming-Yuen Lee; Xun Xu; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Whole genome sequencing of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus; Pleuronectiformes): a fish adapted to demersal life.

Authors:  Antonio Figueras; Diego Robledo; André Corvelo; Miguel Hermida; Patricia Pereiro; Juan A Rubiolo; Jèssica Gómez-Garrido; Laia Carreté; Xabier Bello; Marta Gut; Ivo Glynne Gut; Marina Marcet-Houben; Gabriel Forn-Cuní; Beatriz Galán; José Luis García; José Luis Abal-Fabeiro; Belen G Pardo; Xoana Taboada; Carlos Fernández; Anna Vlasova; Antonio Hermoso-Pulido; Roderic Guigó; José Antonio Álvarez-Dios; Antonio Gómez-Tato; Ana Viñas; Xulio Maside; Toni Gabaldón; Beatriz Novoa; Carmen Bouza; Tyler Alioto; Paulino Martínez
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparative metabolomics study on anadromous clupeid Tenualosa ilisha for better understanding the influence of habitat on nutritional composition.

Authors:  Satabdi Ganguly; Tandrima Mitra; Arabinda Mahanty; Sasmita Mohanty; Bimal P Mohanty
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Chromosome-Level Assembly of the Atlantic Silverside Genome Reveals Extreme Levels of Sequence Diversity and Structural Genetic Variation.

Authors:  Anna Tigano; Arne Jacobs; Aryn P Wilder; Ankita Nand; Ye Zhan; Job Dekker; Nina Overgaard Therkildsen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Draft genome assembly of Tenualosa ilisha, Hilsa shad, provides resource for osmoregulation studies.

Authors:  Vindhya Mohindra; Tanushree Dangi; Ratnesh K Tripathi; Rajesh Kumar; Rajeev K Singh; J K Jena; T Mohapatra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.