Literature DB >> 33593192

Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks.

HaDi MaBouDi1, Andrew B Barron1,2, Sun Li3, Maria Honkanen4, Olli J Loukola4, Fei Peng3, Wenfeng Li5, James A R Marshall1, Alex Cope1, Eleni Vasilaki1, Cwyn Solvi2,6.   

Abstract

We examined how bees solve a visual discrimination task with stimuli commonly used in numerical cognition studies. Bees performed well on the task, but additional tests showed that they had learned continuous (non-numerical) cues. A network model using biologically plausible visual feature filtering and a simple associative rule was capable of learning the task using only continuous cues inherent in the training stimuli, with no numerical processing. This model was also able to reproduce behaviours that have been considered in other studies indicative of numerical cognition. Our results support the idea that a sense of magnitude may be more primitive and basic than a sense of number. Our findings highlight how problematic inadvertent continuous cues can be for studies of numerical cognition. This remains a deep issue within the field that requires increased vigilance and cleverness from the experimenter. We suggest ways of better assessing numerical cognition in non-speaking animals, including assessing the use of all alternative cues in one test, using cross-modal cues, analysing behavioural responses to detect underlying strategies, and finding the neural substrate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accumulator model; animal cognition; inhibition of return; magnitude; spatial frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593192      PMCID: PMC7934903          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  70 in total

1.  Comparing performance in discrete and continuous comparison tasks.

Authors:  Tali Leibovich; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Numerical ordering of zero in honey bees.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Andrew D Greentree; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Animal cognition. Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Giorgio Vallortigara; Konstantinos Priftis; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Experimental setting affects the performance of guppies in a numerical discrimination task.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Beste Başak Savaşçı; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  Infant visual preferences: a review and new theoretical treatment.

Authors:  M S Banks; A P Ginsburg
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1985

6.  Precise relative-quantity judgement in the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas.

Authors:  Zhanna Reznikova; Sofia Panteleeva; Nataliya Vorobyeva
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Bumblebees Use Sequential Scanning of Countable Items in Visual Patterns to Solve Numerosity Tasks.

Authors:  HaDi MaBouDi; H Samadi Galpayage Dona; Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Emma Buckley; Panayiotis D Onoufriou; Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Ratio abstraction over discrete magnitudes by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Koleen McCrink; Maria-Dolores de Hevia; Giorgio Vallortigara; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Visual modulation of olfactory learning in honeybees.

Authors:  B Gerber; B H Smith
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Christian Agrillo; Simone Cutini
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Archerfish number discrimination.

Authors:  Davide Potrich; Mirko Zanon; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Numerosity tuning in human association cortices and local image contrast representations in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Jacob M Paul; Martijn van Ackooij; Tuomas C Ten Cate; Ben M Harvey
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Numerosities and Other Magnitudes in the Brains: A Comparative View.

Authors:  Elena Lorenzi; Matilde Perrino; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 5.  Quantitative abilities of invertebrates: a methodological review.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.