| Literature DB >> 31598203 |
María Del Carmen Jiménez-Sánchez1,2, Juan-José Segura-Egea1, Aránzazu Díaz-Cuenca2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To characterize the chemical composition and textural parameters of the MTA Repair HP precursor powder and their influence to hydration performance.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31598203 PMCID: PMC6776399 DOI: 10.4317/jced.56013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Exp Dent ISSN: 1989-5488
MTA Repair HP manufacturer chemical composition Specifications.
Figure 1a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) and, b) FT-IR analyses of un-hydrated MTA Repair HP material.
Quantitative analysis by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) of MTA Repair HP powder precursor material.
Figure 2Particle size distribution of un-hydrated MTA HP Repair material.
Figure 3N2 physisorption analysis of un-hydrated MTA HP Repair material: a) Adsorption-desorption isotherm; b) BET method analysis using the 0.0-0.2 P/Po adsorption branch range. Vm: Monolayer capacity volume.
Figure 4FEG-SEM secondary electron micrographs at two different magnifications of un-hydrated MTA Repair HP material exhibiting a finer microstructure of elongated nanometric features in thickness (white arrows drawn perpendicular to larger axis).
Figure 5LEFT. Characterization of hydrated MTA HP Repair material: a) XRD pattern; (b) FT-IR and, (c) EDX analysis. CENTRE. Secondary (left column) and back-scatter (right column) FEG-SEM images of hydrated MTA HP Repair material surface at four different magnifications. Scale bars: 10 μm; 5 μm; 2 μm and 1μm. White arrows drawn indicate CaWO4 component distribution. RIGHT. Comparison of FEG-SEM second (top) and back-scatter (down) images of the hydrated MTA Repaid HP material surface. White arrows drawn indicate CaWO4 phase distribution.