| Literature DB >> 35352770 |
Nayara Rodrigues Sartori Franzin1, Michela Melissa Duarte Seixas Sostena1, Alailson Domingos Dos Santos2, Marcia Regina Moura1, Emerson Rodrigues de Camargo3, Thayse Yumi Hosida4, Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem4, João Carlos Silos Moraes1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mechanical, physicochemical, and antimicrobial properties of four different formulations containing micro- or nanoparticles of sodium trimetaphosphate (mTMP and nTMP, respectively).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35352770 PMCID: PMC8963389 DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Chemical composition of pulp-capping cements investigated in this study: ZMC, ZNC, ZMT, and ZNT
| Sample | TMP (%) | ZrO2 (%) | P/L (mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micro | Nano | Chitosan | TiO2 | ||
| ZMC | 85 | 15 | 6.67 | ||
| ZNC | 85 | 15 | 6.67 | ||
| ZMT | 85 | 15 | 6.0 | ||
| ZNT | 85 | 15 | 6.0 | ||
Mean values (SD) of setting time, compressive strength, and radiopacity of the four different cement compositions
| Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Setting time | Compressive strength | Radiopacity |
| (min) | (MPa) | (mm Al) | |
| ZMT | 12.97c | 2.24a | 3.42a |
| (0.15) | (0.41) | (0.13) | |
| ZNT | 5.75a | 3.86c | 3.20a |
| (0.13) | (0.91) | (0.10) | |
| ZMC | 13.34d | 2.81b | 3.53a |
| (0.39) | (0.40) | (0.35) | |
| ZNC | 6.22b | 5.99d | 3.47a |
| (0.07) | (1.04) | (0.26) | |
Means followed by the different letter indicate significant difference among the materials for each analysis (ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test, p<0.05).
Figure 1Mean values (SD) of inhibition zone diameters according to the microorganisms and the different cement formulations. Different lowercase letters show statistical differences between the groups for each bacterial species (Kruskal-Wallis, Student-Newman-Keuls test, p<0.05)