| Literature DB >> 31597322 |
Marco Bo1, Giannina Arru2, Magdalena Niegowska3, Gian Luca Erre4, Piera Angela Manchia5, Leonardo A Sechi6.
Abstract
Environmental factors such as bacterial infections may play an important role in the development of autoimmune diseases. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is an obligate pathogen of ruminants able to use the host's cholesterol for survival into macrophages and has been associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through a molecular mimicry mechanism. Here, we aimed at investigating the correlation between humoral reactivity against MAP and serum lipoprotein levels in subjects at T1DM risk (rT1DM) grouped by geographical background and in patients affected by MS or RA. Our results showed significant differences in HDL, LDL/VLDL and Total Cholesterol (TC) levels between patients and healthy controls (p < 0.0001). Patients positive to anti-MAP Abs (MAP+) had lower HDL levels in comparison with Abs negative (MAP-) subjects, while opposite trends were found for LDL/VLDL concentrations (p < 0.05). TC levels varied between MAP+ and MAP- patients in all three assessed diseases. These findings suggest the implication of anti-MAP Abs in fluctuations of lipoprotein levels highlighting a possible link with cardiovascular disease. Further studies will be needed to confirm these results in larger groups.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmunity; Cholesterol; Multiple Sclerosis; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Type 1 Diabetes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31597322 PMCID: PMC6843567 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7100423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Demographic and clinical characteristics of MS patients and HCs.
| MS | HCs | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 39.77 ± 12.53 | 36.72 ± 11.59 |
| Female, n (%) | 13 (59.09) | 16 (72.72) |
| Cortisone | 12 | |
| No cortisone | 10 | |
| EDSS | 2.53 ± 2 | |
| Relapse, n (%) | 13 (59.09) | |
| RRMS, n (%) | 19 (86.36) | |
| SPMS, n (%) | 3 (13.63) |
MS, multiple sclerosis; HCs, healthy controls; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; RRMM, Relapsing-Remitting MS; SPMS, Secondary progressive MS.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of RA patients and HCs.
| RA | HCs | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 49.3 ± 8.5 | 36.72 ± 11.59 |
| Female, n (%) | 16 (72.7) | 16 (72.72) |
| ESR, mm/h | 18.9 ± 15 | |
| CRP, mg/dL | 1.01 ± 0.9 | |
| DAS28 score | 3.15 ± 1.3 | |
| HAQ score | 0.7 ± 0.6 | |
| ACPA positivity, n (%) | 12 (54.5) | |
| RF positivity, n (%) | 13 (59) | |
| Steroid use, n (%) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Steroid dose, mg/day | 1.58 ± 2.6 | |
| DMARDs use, % | 14 (63.6) | |
| TNFi use, % | 4 (3.3) | |
| Tocilizumab use, % | 7 (58.3) |
RA, rheumatoid arthritis; HCs, healthy controls; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS-28, disease activity score-28 joints; HAQ, health assessment questionnaire; ACPA, anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies; RF, rheumatoid factor; DMARDs, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors.
Figure 1Levels of serum lipoproteins determined through disease-specific analysis. Bars show values were determined in samples from patients (A) with MS, (B) at risk of T1DM (rT1DM) and (C) affected by RA, each analyzed with reference to concentrations obtained for healthy controls (HCs). p-values are specified for each group when statistically significant. Standard deviation is shown for each bar.
Figure 2Disease-related concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol (TC) assessed based on positivity to MAP antigens. The analysis was performed by comparing MAP+ versus MAP- subjects among patients affected by MS (A–C), at risk of T1DM (rT1DM) (D–F) and RA subjects (G–I). Additionally, a comparison of patients and healthy controls (HCs) was carried out for the same MAP-related serological status. Statistical significance is reported above relative bars when attained. For each group, standard deviation is indicated.
Figure 3Concentrations of lipoproteins in subjects at risk of T1DM (rT1DM) grouped according to their geographic provenience. (A) Comparison between patients enrolled in mainland Italy (IT; n = 10) and Sardinia (SA; n = 12). (B) Differences in lipoprotein levels between IT and SA participants grouped according to their serological response to MAP antigens. Mean and standard deviation are indicated for each bar. Upon the analysis of lipoprotein levels in RA, our results showed a statistical difference in HDL concentrations between RA MAP+ and RA MAP- and when comparing RA MAP- with HCs MAP- (p < 0.0001, Figure 2G). Insignificantly lower HDL concentrations were found among RA MAP+ respect to RA MAP- (Figure 2G). Increased levels of LDL/VLDL were observed in RA MAP+ versus HCs MAP+ (p = 0.0024, Figure 2H) and in RA MAP- versus HCs MAP- (p = 0.0052, Figure 2G); however, a comparison between RA MAP+ and RA MAP- showed no difference. Similar results were obtained for TC (Figure 2I), with strikingly lower levels among HCs regardless of anti-MAP Abs status (p < 0.0001, Figure 2I).