Literature DB >> 31593591

Screening Mammography Outcomes: Risk of Breast Cancer and Mortality by Comorbidity Score and Age.

Joshua Demb1,2,3, Linn Abraham4, Diana L Miglioretti4,5, Brian L Sprague6, Ellen S O'Meara4, Shailesh Advani2,3, Louise M Henderson7, Tracy Onega8, Diana S M Buist4, John T Schousboe9, Louise C Walter10, Karla Kerlikowske1,10, Dejana Braithwaite2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Potential benefits of screening mammography among women ages 75 years and older remain unclear.
METHODS: We evaluated 10-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer and death from breast cancer and other causes by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age in the Medicare-linked Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (1999-2010) cohort of 222 088 women with no less than 1 screening mammogram between ages 66 and 94 years.
RESULTS: During median follow-up of 107 months, 7583 were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and 1742 with ductal carcinoma in situ; 471 died from breast cancer and 42 229 from other causes. The 10-year cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer did not change with increasing CCI but decreased slightly with age: ages 66-74 years (CCI0 = 4.0% [95% CI = 3.9% to 4.2%] vs CCI  ≥ 2 = 3.9% [95% CI = 3.5% to 4.3%]); ages 75-84 years (CCI0 = 3.7% [95% CI = 3.5% to 3.9%] vs CCI  ≥ 2 = 3.4% [95% CI = 2.9% to 3.9%]); and ages 85-94 years (CCI0 = 2.7% [95% CI = 2.3% to 3.1%] vs CCI  ≥ 2 = 2.1% [95% CI = 1.3% to 3.0%]). The 10-year cumulative incidence of other-cause death increased with increasing CCI and age: ages 66-74 years (CCI0 = 10.4% [95% CI = 10.3 to 10.7%] vs CCI ≥ 2 = 43.4% [95% CI = 42.2% to 44.4%]), ages 75-84 years (CCI0 = 29.8% [95% CI = 29.3% to 30.2%] vs CCI ≥ 2 = 61.7% [95% CI = 60.2% to 63.3%]), and ages 85 to 94 years (CCI0 = 60.3% [95% CI = 59.1% to 61.5%] vs CCI  ≥ 2 = 84.8% [95% CI = 82.5% to 86.9%]). The 10-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer death was small and did not vary by age: ages 66-74 years = 0.2% (95% CI = 0.2% to 0.3%), ages 75-84 years = 0.29% (95% CI = 0.25% to 0.34%), and ages 85 to 94 years = 0.3% (95% CI = 0.2% to 0.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative incidence of other-cause death was many times higher than breast cancer incidence and death, depending on comorbidity and age. Hence, older women with increased comorbidity may experience diminished benefit from continued screening.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31593591      PMCID: PMC7301094          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  35 in total

1.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  Virginia L Ernster; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; William E Barlow; Yingye Zheng; Donald L Weaver; Gary Cutter; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Robert Rosenberg; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen H Taplin; Nicole Urban; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Risk of advanced-stage breast cancer among older women with comorbidities.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Rebecca A Hubbard; Patrick S Romano; Weiwei Zhu; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol P McPherson; Karen K Swenson; Martin W Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Incidence of breast cancer and estimates of overdiagnosis after the initiation of a population-based mammography screening program.

Authors:  Andrew Coldman; Norm Phillips
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Louise C Walter; Monika Izano; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Level of disability, multi-morbidity and breast cancer screening: does severity matter?

Authors:  Sara J T Guilcher; Aisha Lofters; Richard H Glazier; Susan B Jaglal; Jennifer Voth; Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectives.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Joshua Demb; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Stage IV Non-breast Cancer Patients and Screening Mammography: It is Time to Stop.

Authors:  Corey K Gentle; Hemasat Alkhatib; Stephanie A Valente; Chao Tu; Debra A Pratt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  ASO Author Reflections: It is Time to Deescalate Screening Mammography for Patients Who Do Not Benefit.

Authors:  Corey K Gentle; Debra A Pratt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Breast biopsy patterns and findings among older women undergoing screening mammography: The role of age and comorbidity.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Linn Abraham; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; John T Schousboe; Joshua Demb; Dongyu Zhang; Louise C Walter; Christoph I Lee; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Impact of chronic diseases on effect of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Anna-Belle Beau; George M Napolitano; Marianne Ewertz; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Per K Andersen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Moderation effect of mammography screening among women with multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Hui-Min Hsieh; Cheng-Ting Shen; Ling-Sui Chen; Fang-Ming Chen; Shu-Chuan Yeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the refusal of surgical treatment in women 40 years and older with breast cancer in the USA between 2010 and 2017.

Authors:  Pierre Fwelo; Zenab I Yusuf; Abigail Adjei; Gabriel Huynh; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Classification of breast cancer using a manta-ray foraging optimized transfer learning framework.

Authors:  Nadiah A Baghdadi; Amer Malki; Hossam Magdy Balaha; Yousry AbdulAzeem; Mahmoud Badawy; Mostafa Elhosseini
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2022-08-08

8.  Function-related Indicators and Outcomes of Screening Mammography in Older Women: Evidence from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.

Authors:  Dongyu Zhang; Linn Abraham; Joshua Demb; Diana L Miglioretti; Shailesh Advani; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; John T Schousboe; Ellen S O'Meara; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.