Literature DB >> 22744339

Risk of advanced-stage breast cancer among older women with comorbidities.

Shagufta Yasmeen1, Rebecca A Hubbard, Patrick S Romano, Weiwei Zhu, Berta M Geller, Tracy Onega, Bonnie C Yankaskas, Diana L Miglioretti, Karla Kerlikowske.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities have been suggested influencing mammography use and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. We compared mammography use, and overall and advanced-stage breast cancer rates, among female Medicare beneficiaries with different levels of comorbidity.
METHODS: We used linked Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) and Medicare claims data from 1998 through 2006 to ascertain comorbidities among 149,045 female Medicare beneficiaries ages 67 and older who had mammography. We defined comorbidities as either "unstable" (life-threatening or difficult to control) or "stable" (age-related with potential to affect daily activity) on the basis of claims within 2 years before each mammogram.
RESULTS: Having undergone two mammograms within 30 months was more common in women with stable comorbidities (86%) than in those with unstable (80.3%) or no (80.9%) comorbidities. Overall rates of advanced-stage breast cancer were lower among women with no comorbidities [0.5 per 1,000 mammograms, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.3-0.8] than among those with stable comorbidities (0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9; P = 0.065 compared with no comorbidities) or unstable comorbidities (1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3; P = 0.002 compared with no comorbidities). Among women having undergone two mammograms within 4 to 18 months, those with unstable and stable comorbidities had significantly higher advanced cancer rates than those with no comorbidities (P = 0.004 and P = 0.03, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities were associated with more frequent use of mammography but also higher risk of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis among the subset of women who had the most frequent use of mammography. IMPACT: Future studies need to examine whether specific comorbidities affect clinical progression of breast cancer. ©2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744339      PMCID: PMC3730817          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  35 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Guibo Xing; Cyllene Morris; Rowan T Chlebowski; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Insulin resistance and its contribution to colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Despina Komninou; Alexis Ayonote; John P Richie; Basil Rigas
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2003-04

4.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Aron Goldhirsch; William C Wood; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates; Beat Thürlimann; Hans-Jörg Senn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol P McPherson; Karen K Swenson; Martin W Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Chris E Holmes; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jeanne Mandelblatt; Somnath Saha; Steven Teutsch; Tom Hoerger; Albert L Siu; David Atkins; Jonathan Klein; Mark Helfand
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  10 in total

1.  Development of a novel murine model of lymphatic metastasis.

Authors:  Babak Banan; Jacob A Beckstead; Lauren E Dunavant; Yoojin Sohn; Jamie M Adcock; Sachiyo Nomura; Naji Abumrad; James R Goldenring; Barbara Fingleton
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Regional Medicare Expenditures and Survival Among Older Women With Localized Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara Tannenbaum; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Sarah Mougalian; Jessica B Long; Rong Wang; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Screening Mammography Outcomes: Risk of Breast Cancer and Mortality by Comorbidity Score and Age.

Authors:  Joshua Demb; Linn Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Ellen S O'Meara; Shailesh Advani; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Diana S M Buist; John T Schousboe; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  To screen or not to screen older women for breast cancer: a conundrum.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 5.  Older adults with cancer and their caregivers - current landscape and future directions for clinical care.

Authors:  Sindhuja Kadambi; Kah Poh Loh; Richard Dunne; Allison Magnuson; Ronald Maggiore; Jason Zittel; Marie Flannery; Julia Inglis; Nikesha Gilmore; Mostafa Mohamed; Erika Ramsdale; Supriya Mohile
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Erica S Rinella; Freya Schnabel; Ruth Oratz; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Louise C Walter; Monika Izano; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Aradhna Kaushal; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Richard D Neal; Bernard Rachet; Greg Rubin; Hardeep Singh; Fiona M Walter; Niek J de Wit; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectives.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Joshua Demb; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Cumulative receiver operating characteristics for analyzing interaction between tissue visfatin and clinicopathologic factors in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Sin-Hua Moi; Yi-Chen Lee; Li-Yeh Chuang; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Fu Ou-Yang; Ming-Feng Hou; Cheng-Hong Yang; Hsueh-Wei Chang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.722

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.