Literature DB >> 14551010

Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.

K S Joseph1, David C Young, Linda Dodds, Colleen M O'Connell, Victoria M Allen, Sujata Chandra, Alexander C Allen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the contribution of changes in maternal characteristics (namely, age, parity, prepregnancy weight, weight gain in pregnancy, smoking status) and obstetric practice (namely, labor induction, epidural anesthesia, delivery by an obstetrician, midpelvic forceps delivery) to recent increases in primary cesarean delivery rates.
METHODS: We studied all deliveries in Nova Scotia, Canada, between 1988 and 2000 after excluding women who had a previous cesarean delivery (n = 127,564). Logistic regression was used to study the effect of changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice on primary cesarean delivery rates. The effect of changes in midpelvic forceps delivery was examined through ecologic Poisson regression.
RESULTS: Primary cesarean delivery rates increased from 13.4% of deliveries in 1988 to 17.5% in 2000. This was due to increases in cesarean deliveries for dystocia (14% increase), breech (24% increase), suspected fetal distress (21% increase), hypertension (47% increase), and miscellaneous indications (73% increase). Adjustment for maternal characteristics reduced the temporal increase in primary cesarean delivery rates between 1988-1991 and 1998-2000 from 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16%, 25%) to 2% (95% CI -2%, 7%). Additional adjustment for obstetric practice factors further reduced period effects. Midpelvic forceps delivery was significantly and negatively associated with primary cesarean delivery (P =.001).
CONCLUSION: Recent increases in primary cesarean delivery rates are a consequence of changes in maternal characteristics. Obstetric practice, which has altered due to changes in maternal characteristics and concerns related to fetal and maternal safety, has also contributed to increases in primary cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551010     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00620-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  38 in total

1.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Changes in maternal characteristics in Nova Scotia, Canada from 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Linda Dodds; Alexander C Allen; Krista Jangaard; Michiel Van den Hof
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

3.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Age at menarche and the risk of operative delivery.

Authors:  Hsu Phern Chong; J Frederik Frøen; Sylvia Richardson; Benoit Liquet; D Stephen Charnock-Jones; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-09-28

6.  Relaparotomy post-cesarean delivery: characteristics and risk factors.

Authors:  Alina Weissmann-Brenner; Eran Barzilay; Raanan Meyer; Gabriel Levin; Danielle Harmatz; Amal Alakeli; Noam Domniz; Israel Yoles
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Labor management and mode of delivery among migrant and Spanish women: does the variability reflect differences in obstetric decisions according to ethnic origin?

Authors:  Cristina Bernis; Carlos Varea; Barry Bogin; Antonio González-González
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

8.  Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Katherine M Keyes; Jessica A Lavery; Ava Hamilton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III: a multi-site cohort study of the impact of delivery method on health, service use, and costs of care in the first postpartum year.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Susan Watt; Paul Krueger; Lehana Thabane; Christine Kurtz Landy; Dan Farine; Marilyn Swinton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Jill Milne; Amiram Gafni; Diane Lu; Stephen Wood; Reg Sauve; Sue Ross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.