Literature DB >> 31591062

Real-time artificial intelligence for detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer by endoscopy: a multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study.

Huiyan Luo1, Guoliang Xu2, Chaofeng Li3, Longjun He2, Linna Luo1, Zixian Wang1, Bingzhong Jing3, Yishu Deng3, Ying Jin1, Yin Li2, Bin Li3, Wencheng Tan2, Caisheng He3, Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun4, Qiubao Wu5, Jun Huang5, De-Wang Huang6, Bin Chen7, Shao-Bin Lin8, Qin-Ming Chen8, Chu-Ming Yuan9, Hai-Xin Chen9, Heng-Ying Pu10, Feng Zhou10, Yun He10, Rui-Hua Xu11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal cancers (including oesophageal cancer and gastric cancer) are the most common cancers worldwide. Artificial intelligence platforms using deep learning algorithms have made remarkable progress in medical imaging but their application in upper gastrointestinal cancers has been limited. We aimed to develop and validate the Gastrointestinal Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System (GRAIDS) for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers through analysis of imaging data from clinical endoscopies.
METHODS: This multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study was done in six hospitals of different tiers (ie, municipal, provincial, and national) in China. The images of consecutive participants, aged 18 years or older, who had not had a previous endoscopy were retrieved from all participating hospitals. All patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer lesions (including oesophageal cancer and gastric cancer) that were histologically proven malignancies were eligible for this study. Only images with standard white light were deemed eligible. The images from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were randomly assigned (8:1:1) to the training and intrinsic verification datasets for developing GRAIDS, and the internal validation dataset for evaluating the performance of GRAIDS. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated using an internal and prospective validation set from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (a national hospital) and additional external validation sets from five primary care hospitals. The performance of GRAIDS was also compared with endoscopists with three degrees of expertise: expert, competent, and trainee. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of GRAIDS and endoscopists for the identification of cancerous lesions were evaluated by calculating the 95% CIs using the Clopper-Pearson method.
FINDINGS: 1 036 496 endoscopy images from 84 424 individuals were used to develop and test GRAIDS. The diagnostic accuracy in identifying upper gastrointestinal cancers was 0·955 (95% CI 0·952-0·957) in the internal validation set, 0·927 (0·925-0·929) in the prospective set, and ranged from 0·915 (0·913-0·917) to 0·977 (0·977-0·978) in the five external validation sets. GRAIDS achieved diagnostic sensitivity similar to that of the expert endoscopist (0·942 [95% CI 0·924-0·957] vs 0·945 [0·927-0·959]; p=0·692) and superior sensitivity compared with competent (0·858 [0·832-0·880], p<0·0001) and trainee (0·722 [0·691-0·752], p<0·0001) endoscopists. The positive predictive value was 0·814 (95% CI 0·788-0·838) for GRAIDS, 0·932 (0·913-0·948) for the expert endoscopist, 0·974 (0·960-0·984) for the competent endoscopist, and 0·824 (0·795-0·850) for the trainee endoscopist. The negative predictive value was 0·978 (95% CI 0·971-0·984) for GRAIDS, 0·980 (0·974-0·985) for the expert endoscopist, 0·951 (0·942-0·959) for the competent endoscopist, and 0·904 (0·893-0·916) for the trainee endoscopist.
INTERPRETATION: GRAIDS achieved high diagnostic accuracy in detecting upper gastrointestinal cancers, with sensitivity similar to that of expert endoscopists and was superior to that of non-expert endoscopists. This system could assist community-based hospitals in improving their effectiveness in upper gastrointestinal cancer diagnoses. FUNDING: The National Key R&D Program of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31591062     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30637-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  56 in total

Review 1.  State of the Art: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy 2020.

Authors:  Jiyoung Lee; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 2.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Computer Vision in the Operating Room: Opportunities and Caveats.

Authors:  Lauren R Kennedy-Metz; Pietro Mascagni; Antonio Torralba; Roger D Dias; Pietro Perona; Julie A Shah; Nicolas Padoy; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 5.  Intelligent automated drug administration and therapy: future of healthcare.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Dhirendra Singh; Prerna Gaur; Deepak Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.

Authors:  Isaac S Chua; Michal Gaziel-Yablowitz; Zfania T Korach; Kenneth L Kehl; Nathan A Levitan; Yull E Arriaga; Gretchen P Jackson; David W Bates; Michael Hassett
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  A Novel Deep Learning System for Diagnosing Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Dehua Tang; Lei Wang; Jingwei Jiang; Yuting Liu; Muhan Ni; Yiwei Fu; Huimin Guo; Zhengwen Wang; Fangmei An; Kaihua Zhang; Yanxing Hu; Qiang Zhan; Guifang Xu; Xiaoping Zou
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Injectable Self-Healing Adhesive pH-Responsive Hydrogels Accelerate Gastric Hemostasis and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Jiahui He; Zixi Zhang; Yutong Yang; Fenggang Ren; Jipeng Li; Shaojun Zhu; Feng Ma; Rongqian Wu; Yi Lv; Gang He; Baolin Guo; Dake Chu
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 10.  Application of artificial intelligence-driven endoscopic screening and diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jer Hsiao; Yuan-Chih Wen; Wei-Yi Lai; Yi-Ying Lin; Yi-Ping Yang; Yueh Chien; Aliaksandr A Yarmishyn; De-Kuang Hwang; Tai-Chi Lin; Yun-Chia Chang; Ting-Yi Lin; Kao-Jung Chang; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Ying-Chun Jheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.