Literature DB >> 8742250

Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection.

J T Mordkoff1, J Miller, A C Roch.   

Abstract

Previous research examining response time has supported coactivation under certain conditions. Other research has found more forceful responses to redundant-target than to single-target displays, suggesting coactivation in the motor component. The authors tested for motor coactivation using response time, response force, and other psychophysiological measures. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that response force is determined by the number of stimuli, not the number of targets, when target-distractor discriminations are required. In Experiment 3, 1 stimulus was presented on each trial, and the number of target features was varied. The response time results showed that coactivation occurred somewhere in the information-processing system, but no evidence of motor coactivation was found using any psychophysiological measure. These data disconfirm the motor-coactivation hypothesis for tasks that require visual discriminations.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8742250     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; P J Gianaros
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Cathleen M Moore; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

6.  The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular systems in the redundant target effect.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Veronica Mazza; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate.

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-29

8.  Visuo-motor pathways in humans revealed by event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Roberto Martuzzi; Micah M Murray; Philippe P Maeder; Eleonora Fornari; Jean- Philippe Thiran; Stephanie Clarke; Christoph M Michel; Reto A Meuli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The locus of temporal preparation effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Bettina Rolke; Steven A Hackley; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

10.  Visuospatial attention and redundancy gain.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Daniela Beutinger; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.