Bryan M Wong1,2, Richard W Cheng1, Efrem D Mandelcorn3,4, Edward Margolin3,4, Sherif El-Defrawy3,4, Peng Yan3,4, Anna T Santiago5, Elena Leontieva1, Wendy Lou6, Wendy Hatch3,4, Christopher Hudson1,3. 1. University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 2. University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Baycrest, Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). METHODS: The sample comprised 30 subjects with NDD, including vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Macular SD-OCT scans were acquired and segmented using Heidelberg Spectralis. For the central foveal B scan of each eye, eight segmentation lines were examined to determine the proportion of each line that the software erroneously delineated. Errors in four lines were manually corrected in all B scans spanning a 6-mm circle centered on the foveola. Mean volume and thickness measurements for four retinal layers (total retina, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], inner retinal layers, and outer retinal layers) were obtained before and after correction. RESULTS: The outer plexiform layer line had one of the lowest mean error ratios (2%), while RNFL had the highest (23%). Agreement between automated software and trained observer was excellent (ICC > 0.98) for retinal thickness and volume of all layers. Mean volume differences between software and observers for the four layers ranged from -0.003 to 0.006 mm3. Mean thickness differences ranged from -1.855 to 1.859 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite occasional small errors in software-generated retinal sublayer segmentation, agreement was excellent between software-derived and observer-corrected mean volume and thickness sublayer measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Automated SD-OCT segmentation software generates valid measurements of retinal layer volume and thickness in NDD subjects, thereby avoiding the need to manually correct nonobvious delineation errors. Copyright 2019 The Authors.
PURPOSE: This study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). METHODS: The sample comprised 30 subjects with NDD, including vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Macular SD-OCT scans were acquired and segmented using Heidelberg Spectralis. For the central foveal B scan of each eye, eight segmentation lines were examined to determine the proportion of each line that the software erroneously delineated. Errors in four lines were manually corrected in all B scans spanning a 6-mm circle centered on the foveola. Mean volume and thickness measurements for four retinal layers (total retina, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], inner retinal layers, and outer retinal layers) were obtained before and after correction. RESULTS: The outer plexiform layer line had one of the lowest mean error ratios (2%), while RNFL had the highest (23%). Agreement between automated software and trained observer was excellent (ICC > 0.98) for retinal thickness and volume of all layers. Mean volume differences between software and observers for the four layers ranged from -0.003 to 0.006 mm3. Mean thickness differences ranged from -1.855 to 1.859 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite occasional small errors in software-generated retinal sublayer segmentation, agreement was excellent between software-derived and observer-corrected mean volume and thickness sublayer measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Automated SD-OCT segmentation software generates valid measurements of retinal layer volume and thickness in NDD subjects, thereby avoiding the need to manually correct nonobvious delineation errors. Copyright 2019 The Authors.
Authors: Florian M Heussen; Yanling Ouyang; Emma C McDonnell; Ramsudha Narala; Humberto Ruiz-Garcia; Alexander C Walsh; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Lala Ceklic; Christian K Brinkmann; Milko E Iliev; Manuel Frey; Simon P Rothenbuehler; Volker Enzmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jagan A Pillai; Robert Bermel; Aaron Bonner-Jackson; Alexander Rae-Grant; Hubert Fernandez; James Bena; Stephen E Jones; Justis P Ehlers; James B Leverenz Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: V Polo; E Garcia-Martin; M P Bambo; J Pinilla; J M Larrosa; M Satue; S Otin; L E Pablo Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Marta Para-Prieto; Raul Martin; Sara Crespo; Laura Mena-Garcia; Andres Valisena; Lisandro Cordero; Gloria Gonzalez Fernandez; Juan F Arenillas; Nieves Tellez; Jose Carlos Pastor Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-14
Authors: Jessica Alber; Edmund Arthur; Stuart Sinoff; Delia Cabrera DeBuc; Emily Y Chew; Lori Douquette; Wendy V Hatch; Chris Hudson; Amir Kashani; Cecelia S Lee; Stephen Montaquila; Sima Mozdbar; Leonardo Provetti Cunha; Faryan Tayyari; Gregory Van Stavern; Peter J Snyder Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-11-01
Authors: Jason Kugelman; David Alonso-Caneiro; Yi Chen; Sukanya Arunachalam; Di Huang; Natasha Vallis; Michael J Collins; Fred K Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Robert P Finger; Monique M B Breteler; Matthias M Mauschitz; Valerie Lohner; Alexandra Koch; Tony Stöcker; Martin Reuter; Frank G Holz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 4.379