Literature DB >> 22437338

Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005-2010.

Thomas G Beach1, Sarah E Monsell, Leslie E Phillips, Walter Kukull.   

Abstract

The neuropathologic examination is considered to provide the gold standard for Alzheimer disease (AD). To determine the accuracy of currently used clinical diagnostic methods, clinical and neuropathologic data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, which gathers information from the network of National Institute on Aging (NIA)-sponsored Alzheimer Disease Centers (ADCs), were collected as part of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (UDS) between 2005 and 2010. A database search initially included all 1198 subjects with at least one UDS clinical assessment and who had died and been autopsied; 279 were excluded as being not demented or because critical data fields were missing. The final subject number was 919. Sensitivity and specificity were determined based on "probable" and "possible" AD levels of clinical confidence and 4 levels of neuropathologic confidence based on varying neuritic plaque densities and Braak neurofibrillary stages. Sensitivity ranged from 70.9% to 87.3%; specificity ranged from 44.3% to 70.8%. Sensitivity was generally increased with more permissive clinical criteria and specificity was increased with more restrictive criteria, whereas the opposite was true for neuropathologic criteria. When a clinical diagnosis was not confirmed by minimum levels of AD histopathology, the most frequent primary neuropathologic diagnoses were tangle-only dementia or argyrophilic grain disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, cerebrovascular disease, Lewy body disease and hippocampal sclerosis. When dementia was not clinically diagnosed as AD, 39% of these cases met or exceeded minimum threshold levels of AD histopathology. Neurologists of the NIA-ADCs had higher predictive accuracy when they diagnosed AD in subjects with dementia than when they diagnosed dementing diseases other than AD. The misdiagnosis rate should be considered when estimating subject numbers for AD studies, including clinical trials and epidemiologic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437338      PMCID: PMC3331862          DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31824b211b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0022-3069            Impact factor:   3.685


  51 in total

1.  Diagnosing dementia: interrater reliability assessment and accuracy of the NINCDS/ADRDA criteria versus CERAD histopathological criteria for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E Hogervorst; L Barnetson; K A Jobst; Z Nagy; M Combrinck; A D Smith
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.959

2.  Accurate prediction of histologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and the differential diagnosis of dementia: the use of NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria, SPECT, X-ray CT, and Apo E4 in medial temporal lobe dementias. Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Aging.

Authors:  K A Jobst; L P Barnetson; B J Shepstone
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.878

3.  Clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease: autopsy results in 150 cases.

Authors:  C L Joachim; J H Morris; D J Selkoe
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Z S Khachaturian
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-11

5.  The NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease: a clinicopathologic study of 57 cases.

Authors:  M C Tierney; R H Fisher; A J Lewis; M L Zorzitto; W G Snow; D W Reid; P Nieuwstraten
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Clinico-neuropathological correlation of Alzheimer's disease in a community-based case series.

Authors:  A Lim; D Tsuang; W Kukull; D Nochlin; J Leverenz; W McCormick; J Bowen; L Teri; J Thompson; E R Peskind; M Raskind; E B Larson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The National Institute on Aging, and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Assessment of the pathological stages of Alzheimer's disease in thin paraffin sections: a comparative study.

Authors:  Z Nagy; D M Yilmazer-Hanke; H Braak; E Braak; C Schultz; J Hanke
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 9.  Genotype-phenotype relationships of presenilin-1 mutations in Alzheimer's disease: an update.

Authors:  Andrew J Larner; Mark Doran
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Neuropathology-based risk scoring for dementia diagnosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Eric Larson; Rod Walker; Thomas Montine; Joshua Sonnen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.472

View more
  334 in total

1.  Neuropsychological Markers of Cognitive Decline in Persons With Alzheimer Disease Neuropathology.

Authors:  Jason Hassenstab; Sarah E Monsell; Charles Mock; Catherine M Roe; Nigel J Cairns; John C Morris; Walter Kukull
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Beyond amyloid: getting real about nonamyloid targets in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Karl Herrup; Maria C Carrillo; Dale Schenk; Angela Cacace; Susan Desanti; Robert Fremeau; Ratan Bhat; Marcie Glicksman; Patrick May; Russell Swerdlow; Linda J Van Eldik; Lisa J Bain; Samantha Budd
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Bias induced by ignoring double truncation inherent in autopsy-confirmed survival studies of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Lior Rennert; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Mild to moderate Alzheimer dementia with insufficient neuropathological changes.

Authors:  Alberto Serrano-Pozo; Jing Qian; Sarah E Monsell; Deborah Blacker; Teresa Gómez-Isla; Rebecca A Betensky; John H Growdon; Keith A Johnson; Matthew P Frosch; Reisa A Sperling; Bradley T Hyman
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; David T Jones; Kejal Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Prashanthi Vemuri; Denise A Reyes; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Use of Standardized Uptake Value Ratios Decreases Interreader Variability of [18F] Florbetapir PET Brain Scan Interpretation.

Authors:  A P Nayate; J G Dubroff; J E Schmitt; I Nasrallah; R Kishore; D Mankoff; D A Pryma
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Florbetapir positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers.

Authors:  Ann Hake; Paula T Trzepacz; Shufang Wang; Peng Yu; Michael Case; Helen Hochstetler; Michael M Witte; Elisabeth K Degenhardt; Robert A Dean
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  Alzheimer's disease first symptoms are age dependent: Evidence from the NACC dataset.

Authors:  Josephine Barnes; Bradford C Dickerson; Chris Frost; Lize C Jiskoot; David Wolk; Wiesje M van der Flier
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 9.  Hippocampal Sclerosis, Argyrophilic Grain Disease, and Primary Age-Related Tauopathy.

Authors:  Gregory A Jicha; Peter T Nelson
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2019-02

Review 10.  Factors Influencing Clinical Correlates of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE): a Review.

Authors:  Breton M Asken; Molly J Sullan; Aliyah R Snyder; Zachary M Houck; Vaughn E Bryant; Loren P Hizel; Molly E McLaren; Duane E Dede; Michael S Jaffee; Steven T DeKosky; Russell M Bauer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.