Literature DB >> 31587262

A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity.

Guido Corradi1, Erick G Chuquichambi1, Juan Ramón Barrada2, Ana Clemente1, Marcos Nadal1.   

Abstract

Aesthetic sensitivity has been defined as the ability to recognize and appreciate beauty and compositional excellence, and to judge artistic merit according to standards of aesthetic value. The Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (VAST) has often been used to assess this ability, but recent research has revealed it has several psychometric problems. Such problems are not easily remedied, because they reflect flawed assumptions inherent to the concept of aesthetic sensitivity as traditionally understood, and to the VAST itself. We introduce a new conception of aesthetic sensitivity defined as the extent to which someone's aesthetic valuation is influenced by a given feature. Experiment 1 aimed to characterize aesthetic sensitivity to four prominent features in visual aesthetics: complexity, symmetry, contour, and balance. Experiment 2 aimed to replicate the findings of Experiment 1 and to assess the test-retest reliability of an instrument designed to measure aesthetic sensitivity to these features using an abridged set of stimuli. Our results reveal that people differ remarkably in the extent to which visual features influence their liking, highlighting the crucial role of individual variation when modelling aesthetic preferences. We did not find clear relations between the four measures of aesthetic sensitivity and personality, intelligence, and art interest and knowledge. Finally, our measurement instrument exhibited an adequate-to-good test-retest reliability.
© 2019 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aesthetic sensitivity; balance; complexity; contour; curvature; symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31587262     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

Review 1.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Social reputation influences on liking and willingness-to-pay for artworks: A multimethod design investigating choice behavior along with physiological measures and motivational factors.

Authors:  Blanca T M Spee; Matthew Pelowski; Jozsef Arato; Jan Mikuni; Ulrich S Tran; Christoph Eisenegger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The Living Space: Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health in Response to Interiors Presented in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Nour Tawil; Izabela Maria Sztuka; Kira Pohlmann; Sonja Sudimac; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Swipes and Saves: A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Aesthetic Assessments and Perceived Beauty of Mobile Phone Photographs.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Jussi Hakala; Veli-Tapani Peltoketo; Christian Valuch; Matthew Pelowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.

Authors:  Erick G Chuquichambi; Letizia Palumbo; Carlos Rey; Enric Munar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Using Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Measures in Museum Studies.

Authors:  Nils Myszkowski; Franck Zenasni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.