BACKGROUND: Dietary sodium excess and malnutrition have been associated with poor outcomes in heart failure (HF). Few previous studies have examined the barriers to following a low-sodium, nutritionally robust diet in hospitalized patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of a dietary intervention pilot study, 76 inpatients with HF (age 71 ± 8 years, 30% female, 30% black, 36% Hispanic/Latino) completed 2 questionnaires, the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) and the Brief Dietary Psychosocial Scale (BDPS), to assess challenges in following a low-sodium, nutritionally complete diet. We assessed the factor structure of the DSRQ and BDPS with confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis (CFA and EFA). CFA did not support the established 3-factor solution for the DSRQ; instead, EFA indicated that a 2-factor solution (subjective norms/attitudes and perceived behavioral control) provided the best fit for the data. EFA supported 4 separate factors for the BDPS, as in its original derivation. Cronbach's alphas supported internal consistency reliability for both scales (DSRQ: 0.85-0.94; BDPS: 0.72-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed-ethnicity group of hospitalized older patients with HF, the DSRQ and BDPS have reasonable psychometric properties. These questionnaires may help identify barriers to healthy dietary practices and facilitate nutritional interventions in this high-risk population. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Dietary sodium excess and malnutrition have been associated with poor outcomes in heart failure (HF). Few previous studies have examined the barriers to following a low-sodium, nutritionally robust diet in hospitalized patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of a dietary intervention pilot study, 76 inpatients with HF (age 71 ± 8 years, 30% female, 30% black, 36% Hispanic/Latino) completed 2 questionnaires, the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) and the Brief Dietary Psychosocial Scale (BDPS), to assess challenges in following a low-sodium, nutritionally complete diet. We assessed the factor structure of the DSRQ and BDPS with confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis (CFA and EFA). CFA did not support the established 3-factor solution for the DSRQ; instead, EFA indicated that a 2-factor solution (subjective norms/attitudes and perceived behavioral control) provided the best fit for the data. EFA supported 4 separate factors for the BDPS, as in its original derivation. Cronbach's alphas supported internal consistency reliability for both scales (DSRQ: 0.85-0.94; BDPS: 0.72-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed-ethnicity group of hospitalized older patients with HF, the DSRQ and BDPS have reasonable psychometric properties. These questionnaires may help identify barriers to healthy dietary practices and facilitate nutritional interventions in this high-risk population. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Kamal R Mahtani; Carl Heneghan; Igho Onakpoya; Stephanie Tierney; Jeffrey K Aronson; Nia Roberts; F D Richard Hobbs; David Nunan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Juan L Bonilla-Palomas; Antonio L Gámez-López; Juan C Castillo-Domínguez; Mirian Moreno-Conde; María C López Ibáñez; Rosa Alhambra Expósito; Esmeralda Ramiro Ortega; Manuel P Anguita-Sánchez; Antonia Villar-Ráez Journal: Arch Med Res Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.235
Authors: Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Seongkum Heo; Misook L Chung; Cheryl H Zambroski Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Julie L Locher; Christine S Ritchie; Caroline O Robinson; David L Roth; Delia Smith West; Kathryn L Burgio Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2008-04
Authors: Terry A Lennie; Linda Worrall-Carter; Muna Hammash; Jan Odom-Forren; Lynn P Roser; Carol S Smith; Robin Trupp; Misook L Chung; Debra K Moser Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2008