Literature DB >> 31579535

Direct Superior Approach to the Hip for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Andrew A Barrett1, Rami M Ezzibdeh1, Patrick K Horst1, Douglas J Roger2, Derek F Amanatullah1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional posterior approaches to the hip, posterolateral and mini-posterior, violate the iliotibial band and the short external rotators, specifically the quadratus femoris and obturator externus muscles1-4. The direct anterior approach does not violate the iliotibial band or the quadratus femoris, resulting in earlier ambulation and lower dislocation rates1,5-9. The direct superior (DS) is a posterior approach that spares the iliotibial band, obturator externus tendon, and quadratus femoris muscle. The goal of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is to disrupt the least amount of tissue necessary to adequately expose the hip and correctly place implants. Although MIS total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not lived up to all of its promises10-13, MIS-THA may enable early ambulation and decrease length of stay14-16. DESCRIPTION: The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position. An 8 to 10-cm incision is made at a 60° oblique angle starting from the posterior-proximal corner of the greater trochanter. Only the gluteus maximus fascia is incised; the Iliotibial band is completely spared. The gluteus maximus muscle is split bluntly, exposing the gluteus medius muscle, piriformis tendon, and triceps coxae (the obturator internus and superior and inferior gemellus muscles). The piriformis and conjoined tendon are released from the greater trochanter and tagged. The gluteus minimus is elevated, exposing the posterior hip capsule. An arthrotomy is performed prior to dislocating the hip with flexion, adduction, internal rotation, and axial compression. The femoral neck is resected, the acetabulum is reamed, and components or trials are impacted into position. Hip stability is assessed. Final implants are placed. The posterior capsule, piriformis, and obturator internus tendons are repaired anatomically. The fascia and skin are closed. ALTERNATIVES: Posterolateral approach.Mini-posterior approach.Direct lateral approach.Anterolateral approach.Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH).Supercapsular PATH (SuperPath). RATIONALE: The DS approach to the hip differs from the traditional posterior and mini-posterior approaches because it preserves the iliotibial band, quadratus femoris muscle, and obturator externus tendon1, potentially suppressing dislocation. The DS approach to the hip causes less soft-tissue destruction, especially to the gluteus minimus and tensor fasciae latae muscles, compared with the direct anterior approach to the hip, suggesting DS-THA may enhance postoperative mobility1,3,14-16. DS-THA is extensile by extending the incision distally, incising the iliotibial band, and releasing the quadratus femoris muscle. This converts a DS approach to a standard posterolateral approach, providing additional visualization.
Copyright © 2019 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31579535      PMCID: PMC6687490          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  16 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Douglas J Roger; David Hill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mardones; Mark W Pagnano; Joseph P Nemanich; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Vail; E Marc Mariani; Michael H Bourne; Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Luke Ogonda; Roger Wilson; Pooler Archbold; Marie Lawlor; Patricia Humphreys; Seamus O'Brien; David Beverland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  George F Chimento; Vito Pavone; Nigel Sharrock; Barbara Kahn; Janet Cahill; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A J Vicar; C R Coleman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Charles R Clark
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael J Taunton; J Bohannon Mason; Susan M Odum; Bryan D Springer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip.

Authors:  R de Verteuil; M Imamura; S Zhu; C Glazener; C Fraser; N Munro; J Hutchison; A Grant; D Coyle; K Coyle; L Vale
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  7 in total

1.  No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bouke J Duijnisveld; Joost A A M van den Hout; Robert Wagenmakers; Koen L M Koenraadt; Stefan B T Bolder
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  Impact of Acetabular Implant Design on Aseptic Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gloria Coden; Chelsea Matzko; Shazaan Hushmendy; William Macaulay; Matthew Hepinstall
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 3.  Efficacy of Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fulong Zhao; Yang Xue; Xuefei Wang; Yunjia Zhan
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  German surgeons' technical preferences for performing total hip arthroplasties: a survey from the National Endoprosthesis Society.

Authors:  Ioannis Stratos; Karl-Dieter Heller; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  SuperPath approach is a recommendable option in frail patients with femoral neck fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Antonio Benedetto Cecere; Annalisa De Cicco; Gaetano Bruno; Giuseppe Toro; Giacomo Errico; Adriano Braile; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Architecture of the Short External Rotator Muscles of the Hip.

Authors:  Kevin C Parvaresh; Charles Chang; Ankur Patel; Richard L Lieber; Scott T Ball; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Direct anterior approach or posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: A direct comparative study protocol.

Authors:  Lingchao Kong; Long Chen; Li Sun; Xiaobin Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.