Literature DB >> 6467710

A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

A J Vicar, C R Coleman.   

Abstract

For evaluation of both the anterolateral and posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty as alternatives to the transtrochanteric approach, 269 replacement procedures in 237 patients were reviewed. Follow-up periods ranged from 24 to 71 months (average, 38.2 months). The anterolateral approach was used in 91 hips, the transtrochanteric approach in 136, and the posterior approach in 42. Dislocation was four times more common (p less than .05) in the posterior approach (9.5%) than in the other two (2.2% each). Seven of the nine dislocations occurred in patients older than 65 years of age, and all four dislocations in the posterior approach group occurred in patients over 65. Heterotrophic bone was three times more common (p less than .10) in posterior and transtrochanteric approaches than in the anterolateral approach. Trochanteric bursitis was twice as common (p less than .05) in the transtrochanteric approach than in the other two. Roentgenographic evaluation of femoral component positioning, width of medial calcar cement, and acetabular cup orientation showed no significant differences between the three surgical approaches. It is apparent that the anterolateral surgical approach (modified Watson-Jones) provides a satisfactory alternative to trochanteric osteotomy in the elderly patient who requires total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6467710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  26 in total

1.  [The medial approach for total hip replacement].

Authors:  W Thomas; L Lucente; P Benecke; C L Busch; H Grundei
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  E Engelbrecht; T Gehrke
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Hip replacement by a minimal anterior approach.

Authors:  P Paillard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Procyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Modified posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty to enhance joint stability.

Authors:  Yong Sik Kim; Soon Yong Kwon; Doo Hoon Sun; Suk Ku Han; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Acetabular orientation: anterolateral approach in the supine position.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Review: posterior soft tissue repair in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Bottner; P M Pellicci
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02

8.  Late dislocation is associated with recurrence after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Itokawa; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Mio Akiyama; Masanobu Hirata; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Dislocation and its recurrence after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kensei Yoshimoto; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takuaki Yamamoto; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head.

Authors:  Einar Amlie; Øystein Høvik; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.