Tyler S Watters1, John R Martin2, Daniel L Levy3, Charlie C Yang3, Raymond H Kim4, Douglas A Dennis5. 1. Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado; Raleigh Orthopaedic Clinic, Raleigh, North Carolina. 2. Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado; OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, North Carolina. 3. Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado. 4. Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia. 5. Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metaphyseal bone loss is commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute types 2 and 3 defects generally require some form of metaphyseal fixation or augmentation. This study evaluates the midterm results of stepped, porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA in the setting of severe bone loss. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision TKA using metaphyseal sleeves from March 2006 to May 2014 at our institution were identified from a prospective research database. Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared with preoperative values. Primary study outcomes included complications, reoperations, radiographic assessment of sleeve osteointegration, and survivorship. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen knees (108 patients) underwent revision TKA with 152 metaphyseal sleeves (111 tibial and 41 femoral). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute defect classification included 5 type 2A, 89 type 2B, and 17 type 3 tibial defects; and 3 type 2A, 34 type 2B, and 4 type 3 femoral defects. There were 3 intraoperative fractures (1.9%) associated with sleeve preparation and/or insertion. Six knees (5 patients) were lost to follow-up and 5 patients (6 knees) died before 2 years. Of the remaining 104 knees (98 patients, 134 sleeves), mean follow-up was 5.3 years (range 2-9.6 years). Nineteen knees (16.4%) required reoperation, most commonly for recurrent infection. Only one sleeve demonstrated radiographic evidence of failed osteointegration, but did not require revision. Two sleeves (1.5%) required removal and/or resection for recurrent infection. CONCLUSION: This large retrospective series illustrates the utility of porous metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA with a low rate of intraoperative complications, excellent osteointegration, and long-term fixation.
BACKGROUND: Metaphyseal bone loss is commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute types 2 and 3 defects generally require some form of metaphyseal fixation or augmentation. This study evaluates the midterm results of stepped, porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA in the setting of severe bone loss. METHODS:Patients who underwent revision TKA using metaphyseal sleeves from March 2006 to May 2014 at our institution were identified from a prospective research database. Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared with preoperative values. Primary study outcomes included complications, reoperations, radiographic assessment of sleeve osteointegration, and survivorship. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen knees (108 patients) underwent revision TKA with 152 metaphyseal sleeves (111 tibial and 41 femoral). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute defect classification included 5 type 2A, 89 type 2B, and 17 type 3 tibial defects; and 3 type 2A, 34 type 2B, and 4 type 3 femoral defects. There were 3 intraoperative fractures (1.9%) associated with sleeve preparation and/or insertion. Six knees (5 patients) were lost to follow-up and 5 patients (6 knees) died before 2 years. Of the remaining 104 knees (98 patients, 134 sleeves), mean follow-up was 5.3 years (range 2-9.6 years). Nineteen knees (16.4%) required reoperation, most commonly for recurrent infection. Only one sleeve demonstrated radiographic evidence of failed osteointegration, but did not require revision. Two sleeves (1.5%) required removal and/or resection for recurrent infection. CONCLUSION: This large retrospective series illustrates the utility of porous metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA with a low rate of intraoperative complications, excellent osteointegration, and long-term fixation.
Authors: Emmanuel Gibon; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Edvinas Sipavicius; Justin T Deen; Hernan A Prieto; Chancellor F Gray; Hari K Parvataneni; Luis Pulido Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2022-06