Literature DB >> 25755068

Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

F Boureau1, S Putman2, A Arnould2, G Dereudre2, H Migaud2, G Pasquier2.   

Abstract

Management of bone loss is a major challenge in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The development of preformed porous tantalum cones offers new possibilities, because they seem to have biological and mechanical qualities that facilitate osseointegration. Compared to the original procedure, when metaphyseal bone defects are too severe, a single tantalum cone may not be enough and we have developed a technique that could extend the indications for this cone in these cases. We used 2 cones to fill femoral bone defects in 7 patients. There were no complications due to wear of the tantalum cones. Radiological follow-up did show any migration or loosening. The short-term results confirm the interest of porous tantalum cones and suggest that they can be an alternative to allografts or megaprostheses in case of massive bone defects.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defects; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Tantalum; Trabecular metal cone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25755068     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  10 in total

1.  Tantalum coating of porous carbon scaffold supplemented with autologous bone marrow stromal stem cells for bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaowei Wei; Dewei Zhao; Benjie Wang; Wei Wang; Kai Kang; Hui Xie; Baoyi Liu; Xiuzhi Zhang; Jinsong Zhang; Zhenming Yang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-02-02

2.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

Review 3.  Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Thorsten Gehrke; Akos Zahar; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 4.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Stepped, Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeve.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; David C Holst; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-04-24

6.  Facing metaphyseal bone stock defects: Mid- and longterm results of cones.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Carsten Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 7.  Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero; Carlos A Encinas-Ullán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 8.  Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Erhu Li; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  Application of three-dimensional-printed porous tantalum cones in total knee arthroplasty revision to reconstruct bone defects.

Authors:  Yunong Ao; Lin Guo; Hao Chen; Rui He; Pengfei Yang; Dejie Fu; Lingchuan Gu; Yang Peng; Ran Xiong; Liu Yang; Fuyou Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-05

10.  An evaluation of the potential consequences of drilling titanium and tantalum implants during surgery - a pilot study.

Authors:  Paweł Skowronek; Paweł Olszewski; Wojciech Święszkowski; Marcin Sibiński; Marek Synder; Michał Polguj
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.