| Literature DB >> 31579432 |
Iryna Antonyshyn1, Olga Sichevych1, Alim Ormeci1, Ulrich Burkhardt1, Karsten Rasim1, Sven Titlbach2, Marc Armbrüster3, Stephan A Schunk2, Yuri Grin1.
Abstract
The ethylene epoxidation is a challenging catalytic process, and development of active and selective catalyst requires profound understanding of its chemical behaviour under reaction conditions. The systematic study on intermetallic compounds in the Ca-Ag system under ethylene epoxidation conditions clearly shows that the character of the oxidation processes on the surface originates from the atomic interactions in the pristine compound. The Ag-rich compounds Ca2Ag7 and CaAg2 undergo oxidation towards fcc Ag and a complex Ca-based support, whereas equiatomic CaAg and the Ca-rich compounds Ca5Ag3 and Ca3Ag in bulk remain stable under harsh ethylene epoxidation conditions. For the latter presence of water vapour in the gas stream leads to noticeable corrosion. Combining the experimental results with the chemical bonding analysis and first-principles calculations, the relationships among the chemical nature of the compounds, their reactivity and catalytic performance towards epoxidation of ethylene are investigated.Entities:
Keywords: 106 Metallic materials; 205 Catalyst / Photocatalyst / Photosynthesis; 301 Chemical syntheses / processing; 401 1st principle calculations; 503 TEM, STEM, SEM; 60 New topics / Others; Intermetallic compound; chemical bonding; crystal structure; ethylene epoxidation; ethylene oxide; heterogeneous catalysis; reactivity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31579432 PMCID: PMC6758618 DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2019.1655664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Figure 1.Crystal structures of elemental silver and Ca–Ag compounds with coordination polyhedra of Ag atoms (Ag grey; Ca blue).
Figure 2.Calculated composition-dependent heats of formation for the compounds in the binary system Ca–Ag.
Figure 3.Band centre, band top edge and band width of Ag 4d states versus Ag content in Ca–Ag binary compounds.
Figure 4.QTAIM volumes (top) and effective charges (bottom) of Ca and Ag atoms in different Ca–Ag binary compounds.
Figure 5.Distribution of bond electrons over different bond types for each Ca–Ag compound. The bond types are described in the text.
Figure 6.The most competitive surface terminations obtained for Ca2Ag7 (a), Ca5Ag3 (b) and Ca3Ag (c).
Cleavage energies (in meV Å−2) computed for Ca–Ag binary compounds*.
| Ca2Ag7 | CaAg2 [ | CaAg [ | Ca5Ag3 | Ca3Ag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (001)-I: 46.48 | (100)-I: 49.00 | (010)-III: 32.00 | (001)-II: 32.11 | (010)-I: 33.51 |
| (001)-III: 46.58 | (010)-I: 49.80 | (111): 37.50 | (100)-I: 38.40 | (100)-I: 36.45 |
| (010)-I: 46.60 | (001)-I: 49.70 | (101): 38.70 | (001)-I: 36.52 | |
| (010)-II: 47.00 | (010)-II: 36.78 |
*The cleavage planes are denoted according to Figures S6–S8.
Catalytic performance of Ca–Ag compounds for ethylene epoxidation: selectivity towards ethylene oxide (SEO, %) and conversion of ethylene (CC2H4, %) as response to varied experimental conditions (temperature (T, °C), gas hourly space velocity (GHSV, h−1) and concentration of ethyl chloride promoter (EC, ppm)).
| GHSV decrease***: | EC decrease***: | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | |||||||||||
| Ca2Ag7 | 250 | 56–58 | 1.5 | ↑4 | ↓ 40 | ↓ <1 | ↑ 3 | ↓ 28 | ↑ 3 | ||
| CaAg2 | 30 | 64 | 3 | ↓ 52 | ↑6 | ↓ 58 | ↓ <1 | ↑ 68 | ↑ 4 | ↓ 36 | ↑ 4 |
| CaAg | 100 | 35 | <1 | ↓ 6 | ↑ 39 | … | ↓ 22 | ||||
| Ca5Ag3 | … | 8 | <1 | ↑ 12 | ↓ 3 | ↑ 12 | … | ||||
| Ca3Ag | … | 4 | <1 | … | … | … | … | ↑ 8 | … | … | … |
* Induction time (tind, h) represents the time for catalytic activity to reach the quasi steady state.
** Selectivity values are given at corresponding level of ethylene conversion; furthermore, these values represent the values of selectivity at standard temperature of 250°C.
*** The response of selectivity and conversion to temperature, GHSV and EC concentration changes are presented: arrow up (down) corresponds to increase (decrease) of selectivity or conversion; the numbers represent the values, reached at final T, GHSV or EC concentration; empty cells mean unchanged catalytic performance compared to standard conditions.
Figure 7.Particle shape and surface morphology of the Ca–Ag compounds after ethylene epoxidation (BSE images, material contrast, 15 kV): general view of particles (left panel) and magnification of selected areas (right panel). The identified phases are marked on the right panel figures. In case of CaAg, oxidation happens only on mechanically damaged areas (for details, see [35]).
Figure 8.Morphology of Ca5Ag3 particles after ethylene epoxidation: without EC promoter (a) and with excess of it (b). The overview of particles (left panels) and enlargement on characteristic regions (right panels) are shown. The phases identified via EDXS analysis are marked in colours.
Figure 9.Initial (a) and relaxed (b) configurations of one EC molecule and 12 oxygen atoms above the pristine surface of Ca5Ag3. The length of the indicated Ca–Cl contact is 2.50 Å (a). The indicated Ca – Cl (Ca–O) contacts vary between 2.88 and 3.01 (2.22 and 2.68) Å (b).
Figure 10.Mass gains as a result of the oxidation of Ca–Ag compounds: (i) calculated according to the scheme CaAg + O2 → X + CaO, where X = Ag, Ca2Ag7, CaAg2, CaAg and Ca5Ag3 (blue bars) and (ii) experimentally obtained during ‘zero conversion’ (orange bars) and ‘full conversion’ (yellow bars) tests. The presence of H2O vapour and CO2 in gas stream and possibility of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 formation was also considered.
Results of DTA/TG-MS experiments on Ca–Ag samples: mass gains (%) as a result of material changes under different oxidative conditions accompanied via the phase analysis using powder X-ray diffraction.
| ‘ | ‘ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Mass gain, % | Phases* | Mass gain, % | Phases* |
| Ca2Ag7 | 0.45 | Ca2Ag7+ Ag | 2.20 | Ag+Ca2Ag7** |
| CaAg2 | 10.8*** | Ag+Ca2Ag7**+CaO** | 4.50 | Ag+Ca2Ag7+ CaO? |
| CaAg | 0.90 | CaAg+CaAg2 | 10.2/11.5 | Ag+CaAg2+ CaAg+Ca2Ag7**+CaO+Ca(OH)2? |
| Ca5Ag3 | 0.63 | Ca5Ag3+ CaAg | 1.5/2.1 | Ca5Ag3+ CaAg+CaAg2+?** |
| Ca3Ag | 0.52 | Ca3Ag+Ca5Ag3 | 1.0 | Ca3Ag+Ca5Ag3+?** |
*according to PXRD data; **only traces are detected ; ***ethylene oxide, CO2 and H2O were detected from MS output.
Figure 11.The relaxed arrangement of 8 water molecules on the pristine 2 × 2 CaAg (010) surface. There are four Ca atoms in the surface unit cell. The indicated Ca–O distances are 2.47–2.48 Å. The remaining four water molecules are too far from the surface to react.
Figure 12.Structural details of the (a) CaO-overlayer and the (b) CaO+H2O – overlayer on CaAg (010) surface.