Literature DB >> 29765757

Crystal structure of calcium perchlorate anhydrate, Ca(ClO4)2, from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data.

Dongmin Lee1, Hyeri Bu1, Dohwan Kim1, Jooeun Hyoung1, Seung-Tae Hong1.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of calcium perchlorate anhydrate was determined from laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data. The title compound was obtained by heating hydrated calcium perchlorate [Ca(ClO4)2·xH2O] at 623 K in air for 12 h. It crystallizes in the ortho-rhom-bic space group Pbca and is isotypic with Ca(AlD4)2. The asymmetric unit contains one Ca, two Cl and eight O sites, all on general sites (Wyckoff position 8c). The crystal structure consists of isolated ClO4- tetra-hedra and Ca2+ cations. The Ca2+ cation is coordinated by eight O atoms of eight symmetry-related ClO4- tetra-hedra within a distorted square-anti-prismatic environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ca(ClO4)2; calcium perchlorate anhydrate; crystal structure; isotypism; powder X-ray diffraction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29765757      PMCID: PMC5946979          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018003936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Recently, the alkaline earth metals, in particular magnesium and calcium, have received attention because of their incorporation in multivalent-ion batteries that can replace Li-ion batteries (Wang et al., 2013 ▸; Datta et al., 2014 ▸; Amatucci et al., 2001 ▸). Calcium has several merits, such as low cost and abundance in nature (Padigi et al., 2015 ▸; Rogosic et al., 2014 ▸). In addition, the standard reduction potential of the calcium electrode is −2.87 V, which is only about 0.18 V higher than that of lithium (Muldoon et al., 2014 ▸). Thus, calcium perchlorate is mainly used as a salt next to organic electrolytes in Ca-ion batteries (Hayashi et al., 2003 ▸). Nevertheless, the crystal structure of anhydrous calcium perchlorate was unknown until now (Pearse & Pflaum, 1959 ▸) because of the lack of single crystals. Calcium perchlorate is strongly hygroscopic, and growing single crystals of a size sufficient for X-ray structure analysis has not been successful up to date. On the other hand, the crystal structures of the perchlorates of magnesium, barium and other alkaline earth metals have been determined for both hydrated and anhydrous phases (Gallucci & Gerkin, 1988 ▸; Lee et al., 2015 ▸; Lim et al., 2011 ▸; Robertson & Bish, 2010 ▸). However, for calcium perchlorate only the hydrated forms were structurally determined (Hennings et al., 2014 ▸). We present here the crystal structure of calcium perchlorate anhydrate, using laboratory powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data (Fig. 1 ▸).
Figure 1

PXRD Rietveld refinement profiles for anhydrous Ca(ClO4)2 measured at ambient temperature. Crosses mark experimental data (black), the solid red line represents the calculated profile (red) and the solid green line is the background. The bottom trace represents the difference curve (blue) and the ticks denote the positions of expected Bragg reflections (magenta).

Structural commentary

The crystal structure of anhydrous calcium perchlorate, Ca(ClO4)2, is isotypic with that of Ca(AlD4)2 (Sato et al., 2009 ▸), but is different from barium or magnesium perchlorates (Lee et al., 2015 ▸; Lim et al., 2011 ▸). Different viewing directions of the crystal structure of Ca(ClO4)2 are presented in Fig. 2 ▸, using ClO4tetra­hedra and Ca2+ cations. The unit cell contains one Ca (on general positions 8c), two Cl (8c), and eight O (8c) sites. The ClO4tetra­hedra are slightly distorted [mean Cl—O distance 1.43 (2) Å, angular range 103.5 (4)–114.6 (4)°] and isolated from each other. The local environment around the Ca2+ cation is presented in Fig. 3 ▸. It is coordinated by eight isolated ClO4tetra­hedra with an apex oxygen atom of each tetra­hedron bonded to the Ca2+ cation. The resulting coordination sphere can be considered as a distorted square anti­prism. The average Ca—O distance is 2.476 Å (Table 1 ▸), which is inter­mediate between those of comparable Mg—O (2.098 Å) and Ba—O (2.989 Å) polyhedra (Lee et al., 2015 ▸; Lim et al., 2011 ▸), and consistent with the sum of the ionic radii of the alkaline earth metals and oxygen (Shannon, 1976 ▸). The coordination number of the Mg2+, Ca2+, and Ba2+ cations in the anhydrous perchlorates increases from 6, 8, and to 12, respectively.
Figure 2

The crystal structure of Ca(ClO4)2 with ClO4 − tetra­hedra (yellow) and Ca2+ cations (purple), showing (a) a view approximately along [001] and (b) approximately along [010].

Figure 3

The local environment of the Ca2+ cation (purple sphere) surrounded by ClO4 − tetra­hedra (yellow). [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) x, −y + , z + ; (iii) −x + 1, y − , −z + ; (iv) −x + , −y + 1, z + .]

Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Ca1—O1i 2.451 (6)Cl1—O21.411 (6)
Ca1—O2ii 2.412 (6)Cl1—O61.414 (6)
Ca1—O32.448 (6)Cl1—O71.421 (6)
Ca1—O4iii 2.370 (6)Cl1—O81.423 (6)
Ca1—O5ii 2.429 (6)Cl2—O11.456 (6)
Ca1—O6iv 2.512 (6)Cl2—O31.408 (6)
Ca1—O7i 2.519 (6)Cl2—O41.453 (6)
Ca1—O82.413 (6)Cl2—O51.442 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Synthesis and crystallization

In order to prepare calcium perchlorate anhydrate, Ca(ClO4)2·xH2O (reagent grade, Alfa Aesar) was placed in 75 ml glass vials. The vials were placed into a box furnace, heated at 623 K for 12 h with a heating rate of 3 K min−1, cooled down to 423 K, and transferred to a glove box under an Ar atmosphere. The exposed time in a normal atmosphere during the transfer was about 10 s. The sample was ground using an agate mortar, and placed in a dome-type PXRD sample holder that was sealed tightly to prevent atmospheric exposure during the data collection.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The powder XRD data of anhydrous calcium perchlorate were collected using a Bragg–Brentano diffractometer (PANalytical Empyrean) with Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 30 mA, using a graphite monochromator and a Pixcel3D 2×2 detector. X-ray intensities were measured for 12 h at 0.013° inter­vals in the angular range of 5° ≤ 2θ ≤ 140°. X-ray diffraction data were indexed by the TREOR90 algorithm (Werner, 1990 ▸) in the CRYSFIRE program suite (Shirley, 2002 ▸), with 22 indexed reflections starting from the smallest angle. An ortho­rhom­bic unit cell was revealed suggesting Pbca as the most probable space group. Based on these results, the refinement process was performed using the GSAS program (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000 ▸) and the CRYSTALS program (Betteridge et al., 2003 ▸). The process was started with the assumption that there is one dummy atom at an arbitrary position. Then direct methods were applied to calculate the initial solution of the crystal structure using SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), which yielded a Ca site as a starting postition. The initial model was then replaced with the partial model, and this data was used for a LeBail fit in GSAS. Then, improved structure factors were calculated, which were used for the refinement in CRYSTALS. These processes were repeated until a complete and sufficient structural model converged. Based on these results, the MCE programme (Rohlíček & Hušák, 2007 ▸) was used to draw the calculated Fourier-density map in three dimensions. For the final Rietveld refinement with GSAS, an overall displacement parameter was used, and Cl—O bond lengths were restrained with a tolerance value of 25% from the distances determined from CRYSTALS, where the distances matched well with Shannon’s radii sum. Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987 ▸), asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994 ▸) and microstrain broadening of Stephens (1999 ▸).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaCa(ClO4)2
M r 238.98
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P b c a
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)13.75102 (8), 9.50887 (5), 9.06168 (5)
V3)1184.88 (1)
Z 8
Radiation typeCu Kα1, λ = 1.5405 Å
Specimen shape, size (mm)Flat sheet, 24.9 × 24.9
 
Data collection
DiffractometerPANalytical Empyrean
Specimen mountingPacked powder
Data collection modeReflection
Scan methodStep
2θ values (°)min = 5.001 2θmax = 139.993 2θstep = 0.013
 
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fit R p = 0.068, R wp = 0.104, R exp = 0.055, R(F 2) = 0.151, χ2 = 3.610
No. of parameters44

Computer programs: X’Pert Data Collector and X’Pert HighScore Plus (PANalytical, 2011 ▸), GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003 ▸) and ATOMS (Dowty, 2000 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018003936/wm5437sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018003936/wm5437Isup2.cml CCDC reference: 1827999 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Ca(ClO4)2Z = 8
Mr = 238.98F(000) = 944.0
Orthorhombic, PbcaDx = 2.680 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P_2ac_2abCu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.5405 Å
a = 13.75102 (8) ÅT = 295 K
b = 9.50887 (5) Åwhite
c = 9.06168 (5) Åflat_sheet, 24.9 × 24.9 mm
V = 1184.88 (1) Å3Specimen preparation: Prepared at 295 K
PANalytical Empyrean diffractometerData collection mode: reflection
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, PANalytical Cu Ceramic X-ray tubeScan method: step
Specimen mounting: packed powdermin = 5.001°, 2θmax = 139.993°, 2θstep = 0.013°
Least-squares matrix: fullExcluded region(s): 5 to 12.5 degrees are excluded due to background scattering at low angles, in addition there are no peaks in this region.
Rp = 0.068Profile function: CW Profile function number 4 with 18 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in P. Thompson, D.E. Cox & J.B. Hastings (1987). J. Appl. Cryst.,20,79-83. Asymmetry correction of L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox & A. P. Jephcoat (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.,27,892-900. Microstrain broadening by P.W. Stephens, (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.,32,281-289. #1(GU) = 9.638 #2(GV) = -11.095 #3(GW) = 2.275 #4(GP) = 4.393 #5(LX) = 0.935 #6(ptec) = 0.00 #7(trns) = 0.00 #8(shft) = -4.2154 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0005 #11(H/L) = 0.0005 #12(eta) = 0.7500 #13(S400 ) = 0.0E+00 #14(S040 ) = 0.0E+00 #15(S004 ) = 0.0E+00 #16(S220 ) = 0.0E+00 #17(S202 ) = 0.0E+00 #18(S022 ) = 0.0E+00 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0100 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0
Rwp = 0.10444 parameters
Rexp = 0.0550 restraints
R(F2) = 0.15096(Δ/σ)max = 0.04
10385 data pointsBackground function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 36 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 396.859 2: -606.961 3: 459.581 4: -240.760 5: 60.9683 6: 66.1787 7: -127.055 8: 123.403 9: -80.0454 10: 22.9955 11: 31.6319 12: -68.9521 13: 82.3967 14: -74.9306 15: 52.4628 16: -22.9755 17: -7.07207 18: 29.6007 19: -41.2483 20: 39.7866 21: -28.2300 22: 12.3296 23: 2.74056 24: -14.4441 25: 20.2978 26: -20.5325 27: 15.0728 28: -6.57858 29: -1.96745 30: 7.61710 31: -10.5263 32: 10.4139 33: -6.95249 34: 2.74624 35: 0.930279 36: -1.93129
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ca10.39788 (14)0.5357 (2)0.7164 (2)0.0110 (2)*
Cl10.34080 (17)0.6066 (3)0.3157 (3)0.0110 (2)*
Cl20.55928 (18)0.7776 (3)0.4961 (3)0.0110 (2)*
O10.6154 (4)0.7025 (6)0.3850 (6)0.0110 (2)*
O20.3176 (4)0.7464 (6)0.2773 (6)0.0110 (2)*
O30.5240 (4)0.6775 (7)0.5973 (7)0.0110 (2)*
O40.6137 (4)0.8834 (6)0.5773 (6)0.0110 (2)*
O50.4842 (4)0.8546 (7)0.4199 (6)0.0110 (2)*
O60.2815 (4)0.5078 (6)0.2414 (6)0.0110 (2)*
O70.4359 (4)0.5744 (6)0.2647 (7)0.0110 (2)*
O80.3387 (4)0.5833 (6)0.4708 (7)0.0110 (2)*
Ca1—Cl13.776 (3)Cl2—Ca13.769 (3)
Ca1—Cl1i3.605 (3)Cl2—Ca1v3.808 (3)
Ca1—Cl1ii3.662 (3)Cl2—Ca1iii3.596 (3)
Ca1—Cl1iii3.851 (3)Cl2—Ca1vii3.627 (3)
Ca1—Cl23.769 (3)Cl2—O11.456 (6)
Ca1—Cl2i3.808 (3)Cl2—O31.408 (6)
Ca1—Cl2iii3.596 (3)Cl2—O41.453 (6)
Ca1—Cl2iv3.627 (3)Cl2—O51.442 (6)
Ca1—O1iii2.451 (6)O1—Ca1iii2.451 (6)
Ca1—O2i2.412 (6)O1—Cl21.456 (6)
Ca1—O32.448 (6)O2—Ca1v2.412 (6)
Ca1—O4iv2.370 (6)O2—Cl11.411 (6)
Ca1—O5i2.429 (6)O3—Ca12.448 (6)
Ca1—O6ii2.512 (6)O3—Cl21.408 (6)
Ca1—O7iii2.519 (6)O4—Ca1vii2.370 (6)
Ca1—O82.413 (6)O4—Cl21.453 (6)
Cl1—Ca13.776 (3)O5—Ca1v2.429 (6)
Cl1—Ca1v3.605 (3)O5—Cl21.442 (6)
Cl1—Ca1vi3.662 (3)O6—Ca1vi2.512 (6)
Cl1—Ca1iii3.851 (3)O6—Cl11.414 (6)
Cl1—O21.411 (6)O7—Ca1iii2.519 (6)
Cl1—O61.414 (6)O7—Cl11.421 (6)
Cl1—O71.421 (6)O8—Ca12.413 (6)
Cl1—O81.423 (6)O8—Cl11.423 (6)
O1iii—Ca1—O2i147.7 (2)O6ii—Ca1—O877.5 (2)
O1iii—Ca1—O3113.4 (2)O7iii—Ca1—O8116.53 (2)
O1iii—Ca1—O5i135.9 (2)O2—Cl1—O6112.2 (4)
O1iii—Ca1—O6ii79.0 (2)O2—Cl1—O7109.4 (4)
O1iii—Ca1—O7iii73.10 (19)O2—Cl1—O8112.7 (4)
O1iii—Ca1—O878.62 (18)O6—Cl1—O7103.5 (4)
O2i—Ca1—O387.3 (2)O6—Cl1—O8110.8 (4)
O2i—Ca1—O5i71.4 (2)O7—Cl1—O8107.8 (4)
O2i—Ca1—O6ii70.80 (19)O1—Cl2—O3107.6 (4)
O2i—Ca1—O7iii139.2 (2)O1—Cl2—O4114.6 (4)
O2i—Ca1—O884.0 (2)O1—Cl2—O5107.3 (4)
O3—Ca1—O5i75.6 (2)O3—Cl2—O4108.4 (4)
O3—Ca1—O6ii145.7 (2)O3—Cl2—O5114.1 (4)
O3—Ca1—O7iii67.4 (2)Ca1iii—O1—Cl2132.3 (4)
O3—Ca1—O874.3 (2)Ca1v—O2—Cl1139.7 (4)
O5i—Ca1—O6ii118.8 (2)Ca1—O3—Cl2154.6 (4)
O5i—Ca1—O7iii71.6 (2)Ca1v—O5—Cl2158.7 (4)
O5i—Ca1—O8141.7 (2)Ca1vi—O6—Cl1135.9 (4)
O6ii—Ca1—O7iii144.7 (2)Ca1iii—O7—Cl1154.5 (4)
  7 in total

1.  Magnesium perchlorate anhydrate, Mg(ClO4)2, from laboratory X-ray powder data.

Authors:  Hyung Kyu Lim; Young Sun Choi; Seung Tae Hong
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  Determination of the crystal structure of magnesium perchlorate hydrates by X-ray powder diffraction and the charge-flipping method.

Authors:  Kevin Robertson; David Bish
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 4.  Quest for nonaqueous multivalent secondary batteries: magnesium and beyond.

Authors:  John Muldoon; Claudiu B Bucur; Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Defective graphene as a high-capacity anode material for Na- and Ca-ion batteries.

Authors:  Dibakar Datta; Junwen Li; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Highly reversible open framework nanoscale electrodes for divalent ion batteries.

Authors:  Richard Y Wang; Colin D Wessells; Robert A Huggins; Yi Cui
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Crystal structures of Sr(ClO4)2·3H2O, Sr(ClO4)2·4H2O and Sr(ClO4)2·9H2O.

Authors:  Erik Hennings; Horst Schmidt; Wolfgang Voigt
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-11-15
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ca-Ag compounds in ethylene epoxidation reaction.

Authors:  Iryna Antonyshyn; Olga Sichevych; Alim Ormeci; Ulrich Burkhardt; Karsten Rasim; Sven Titlbach; Marc Armbrüster; Stephan A Schunk; Yuri Grin
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 8.090

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.