Literature DB >> 31577367

DNA Purification Cell Lysis and Wash Step Modifications for Low-Template DNA Sample Processing.

Sydney I Menchhoff1, Milady T Delacruz1, Madison E Hytinen1, Jordan O Cox1, Marilyn T Miller1, Tracey Dawson Cruz1.   

Abstract

As DNA technology becomes increasingly sensitive, forensic laboratories are receiving more low-template DNA samples. These samples, already low in DNA content, become even more challenging to process as the available DNA becomes further reduced during the extraction step. In this study, two extraction modifications were tested to determine if the cause of DNA loss could be identified and mitigated. A double lysis technique was used to test for DNA loss in the sample collection substrate, and lysate eluates were re-extracted to determine DNA loss from inefficient binding to the silica column. Both modifications showed DNA was lost at these steps. However, resulting STR profiles from these samples had fewer peaks and lower peak heights when compared to samples processed with no extraction modifications. Overall, the potential benefits of adding these extraction modifications for low-template DNA sample processing are not enough to justify the risk associated with additional manipulation.
© 2019 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA extraction; DNA loss; forensic DNA; forensic science; low-template DNA; touch DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31577367      PMCID: PMC9296064          DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.717


  11 in total

1.  A quantitative analysis of DNA extraction and purification from compost.

Authors:  Michael Howeler; William C Ghiorse; Larry P Walker
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.

Authors:  Robert J Brownlow; Kathryn E Dagnall; Carole E Ames
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns.

Authors:  Hwan Young Lee; Myung Jin Park; Na Young Kim; Jeong Eun Sim; Woo Ick Yang; Kyoung-Jin Shin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 4.  How much DNA is lost? Measuring DNA loss of short-tandem-repeat length fragments targeted by the PowerPlex 16® system using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit.

Authors:  Brian M Kemp; Misa Winters; Cara Monroe; Jodi Lynn Barta
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Optimization of a simple, automatable extraction method to recover sufficient DNA from low copy number DNA samples for generation of short tandem repeat profiles.

Authors:  Linnea A Schiffner; Ewelina J Bajda; Mechthild Prinz; James Sebestyen; Robert Shaler; Theresa A Caragine
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Comparison of flocked and rayon swabs for collection of respiratory epithelial cells from uninfected volunteers and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Peter Daley; Santina Castriciano; Max Chernesky; Marek Smieja
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid and reliable high-throughput methods of DNA extraction for use in barcoding and molecular systematics of mushrooms.

Authors:  Bryn T M Dentinger; Simona Margaritescu; Jean-Marc Moncalvo
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  An Optimized DNA Analysis Workflow for the Sampling, Extraction, and Concentration of DNA obtained from Archived Latent Fingerprints.

Authors:  April D Solomon; Madison E Hytinen; Aryn M McClain; Marilyn T Miller; Tracey Dawson Cruz
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.832

9.  Comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from human bones with different degrees of degradation.

Authors:  Joanna Jakubowska; Agnieszka Maciejewska; Ryszard Pawłowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.

Authors:  Michael S Adamowicz; Dominique M Stasulli; Emily M Sobestanovich; Todd W Bille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.