Literature DB >> 25959696

How much DNA is lost? Measuring DNA loss of short-tandem-repeat length fragments targeted by the PowerPlex 16® system using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit.

Brian M Kemp1, Misa Winters, Cara Monroe, Jodi Lynn Barta.   

Abstract

The success in recovering genetic profiles from aged and degraded biological samples is diminished by fundamental aspects of DNA extraction, as well as its long-term preservation, that are not well understood. While numerous studies have been conducted to determine whether one extraction method was superior to others, nearly all of them were initiated with no knowledge of the actual starting DNA quantity in the samples prior to extraction, so they ultimately compared the outcome of all methods relative to the best. Using quantitative PCR to estimate the copy count of synthetic standards before (i.e., "copies in") and after (i.e., "copies out") purification by the Qiagen MinElute PCR Purification Kit, we documented DNA loss within a pool of 16 different-sized fragments ranging from 106 to 409 bp in length, corresponding to those targeted by the PowerPlex 16 System (Promega, Madison, WI). Across all standards from 10(4) to 10(7) copies/μL, loss averaged between 21.75% and 60.56% (mean, 39.03%), which is not congruent with Qiagen's claim that 80% of 70 bp to 4 kb fragments are retained using this product (i.e., 20% loss). Our study also found no clear relationship either between DNA strand length and retention or between starting copy number and retention. This suggests that there is no molecule bias across the MinElute column membrane and highlights the need for manufacturers to clearly and accurately describe on what their claims are based, and should also encourage researchers to document DNA retention efficiencies of their own methods and protocols. Understanding how and where to reduce loss of molecules during extraction and purification will serve to generate clearer and more accurate data, which will enhance the utility of ancient and low-copy-number DNA as a tool for closing forensic cases or in reconstructing the evolutionary history of humans and other organisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dna extraction; dna loss; dna standards; extraction efficiency; promega powerplex 16® system; qiagen minelute

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25959696     DOI: 10.13110/humanbiology.86.4.0313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  8 in total

1.  Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.

Authors:  Allison J Sherier; Rachel E Kieser; Nicole M M Novroski; Frank R Wendt; Jonathan L King; August E Woerner; Angie Ambers; Paolo Garofano; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Evaluation of an isothermal amplification HPV detection assay for primary cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hui Du; Xia Huang; Chun Wang; Xianzhi Duan; Yan Liu; Bin Shi; Wei Zhang; Xinfeng Qu; Lihui Wei; M Schiffman; J L Belinson; Ruifang Wu
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.965

3.  DNA Purification Cell Lysis and Wash Step Modifications for Low-Template DNA Sample Processing.

Authors:  Sydney I Menchhoff; Milady T Delacruz; Madison E Hytinen; Jordan O Cox; Marilyn T Miller; Tracey Dawson Cruz
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 1.717

4.  Differential preservation of endogenous human and microbial DNA in dental calculus and dentin.

Authors:  Allison E Mann; Susanna Sabin; Kirsten Ziesemer; Åshild J Vågene; Hannes Schroeder; Andrew T Ozga; Krithivasan Sankaranarayanan; Courtney A Hofman; James A Fellows Yates; Domingo C Salazar-García; Bruno Frohlich; Mark Aldenderfer; Menno Hoogland; Christopher Read; George R Milner; Anne C Stone; Cecil M Lewis; Johannes Krause; Corinne Hofman; Kirsten I Bos; Christina Warinner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Direct PCR amplification from saliva sample using non-direct multiplex STR kits for forensic DNA typing.

Authors:  Pankaj Shrivastava; Toshi Jain; R K Kumawat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Organellar microcapture to extract nuclear and plastid DNA from recalcitrant wood specimens and trace evidence.

Authors:  Adriana Costa; Giovanny Giraldo; Amy Bishell; Tuo He; Grant Kirker; Alex C Wiedenhoeft
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.827

7.  Determination of materials present in skeletonized human remains and the associated DNA: Development of a GC/MS protocol.

Authors:  Suni M Edson; Marcel Roberts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2019-08-10

8.  Touch DNA in forensic science: The use of laboratory-created eccrine fingerprints to quantify DNA loss.

Authors:  Jessica Tang; Jennifer Ostrander; Ray Wickenheiser; Ashley Hall
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.395

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.