Literature DB >> 31569219

Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Claudia Valli1, Montserrat Rabassa2, Bradley C Johnston3, Ruben Kuijpers4, Anna Prokop-Dorner5, Joanna Zajac5, Dawid Storman5, Monika Storman6, Malgorzata M Bala5, Ivan Solà7, Dena Zeraatkar8, Mi Ah Han9, Robin W M Vernooij10, Gordon H Guyatt8, Pablo Alonso-Coello11.   

Abstract

This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement. Background: A person's meat consumption is often determined by their values and preferences. Purpose: To identify and evaluate evidence addressing health-related values and preferences regarding meat consumption. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences Abstracts, International System for Agricultural Science and Technology, and Food Science and Technology Abstracts were searched from inception to July 2018 without language restrictions. Study Selection: Pairs of reviewers independently screened search results and included quantitative and qualitative studies reporting adults' health-related values and preferences regarding meat consumption. Data Extraction: Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data Synthesis: Data were synthesized into narrative form, and summaries were tabulated and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Of 19 172 initial citations, 41 quantitative studies (38 addressed reasons for meat consumption and 5 addressed willingness to reduce meat consumption) and 13 qualitative studies (10 addressed reasons for meat consumption and 4 addressed willingness to reduce meat consumption) were eligible for inclusion. Thirteen studies reported that omnivores enjoy eating meat, 18 reported that these persons consider meat an essential component of a healthy diet, and 7 reported that they believe they lack the skills needed to prepare satisfactory meals without meat. Omnivores are generally unwilling to change their meat consumption. The certainty of evidence was low for both "reasons for meat consumption" and "willingness to reduce meat consumption in the face of undesirable health effects." Limitation: Limited generalizability of findings to lower-income countries, low-certainty evidence for willingness to reduce meat consumption, and limited applicability to specific types of meat (red and processed meat).
Conclusion: Low-certainty evidence suggests that omnivores are attached to meat and are unwilling to change this behavior when faced with potentially undesirable health effects. Primary Funding Source: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42018088854).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31569219     DOI: 10.7326/M19-1326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  9 in total

Review 1.  Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lisa M Sanders; Meredith L Wilcox; Kevin C Maki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Improvement of glycemic indices by a hypocaloric legume-based DASH diet in adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi; Parvin Mirmiran; Farzad Hadaegh; Maryan Mahdavi; Davood Khalili; Maryam S Daneshpour; Amir Abbas Momenan; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 4.865

3.  Red and processed meat: more with less?

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 8.472

4.  Association between Food Preferences, Eating Behaviors and Socio-Demographic Factors, Physical Activity among Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Chao Qiu; Min Hou
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Values and preferences towards medical cannabis among people living with chronic pain: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Linan Zeng; Lyubov Lytvyn; Xiaoqin Wang; Natasha Kithulegoda; Silvana Agterberg; Yaad Shergill; Meisam Abdar Esfahani; Anja Fog Heen; Thomas Agoritsas; Gordon H Guyatt; Jason W Busse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Total Meat Intake is Associated with Life Expectancy: A Cross-Sectional Data Analysis of 175 Contemporary Populations.

Authors:  Wenpeng You; Renata Henneberg; Arthur Saniotis; Yanfei Ge; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 7.  Women's values and preferences on low-molecular-weight heparin and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Montserrat León-García; Brittany Humphries; Andrea Maraboto; Montserrat Rabassa; Kasey R Boehmer; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Feng Xie; Irene Pelayo; Mark Eckman; Shannon Bates; Anna Selva; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Which diet has the lower water footprint in Mediterranean countries?

Authors:  Davy Vanham; Susann Guenther; Marta Ros-Baró; Anna Bach-Faig
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 10.204

9.  Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Frank Qian; Matthew C Riddle; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.