Literature DB >> 31569217

Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

Robin W M Vernooij1, Dena Zeraatkar2, Mi Ah Han3, Regina El Dib4, Max Zworth2, Kirolos Milio2, Daegan Sit5, Yung Lee2, Huda Gomaa6, Claudia Valli7, Mateusz J Swierz8, Yaping Chang2, Steven E Hanna2, Paula M Brauer9, John Sievenpiper10, Russell de Souza2, Pablo Alonso-Coello11, Malgorzata M Bala8, Gordon H Guyatt2, Bradley C Johnston12.   

Abstract

This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement. Background: Studying dietary patterns may provide insights into the potential effects of red and processed meat on health outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of dietary patterns, including different amounts of red or processed meat, on all-cause mortality, cardiometabolic outcomes, and cancer incidence and mortality. Data Sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global from inception to April 2019 with no restrictions on year or language. Study Selection: Teams of 2 reviewers independently screened search results and included prospective cohort studies with 1000 or more participants that reported on the association between dietary patterns and health outcomes. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Data Synthesis: Eligible studies that followed patients for 2 to 34 years revealed low- to very-low-certainty evidence that dietary patterns lower in red and processed meat intake result in very small or possibly small decreases in all-cause mortality, cancer mortality and incidence, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal coronary heart disease, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and type 2 diabetes. For all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality and incidence of some types of cancer, the total sample included more than 400 000 patients; for other outcomes, total samples included 4000 to more than 300 000 patients. Limitation: Observational studies are prone to residual confounding, and these studies provide low- or very-low-certainty evidence according to the GRADE criteria.
Conclusion: Low- or very-low-certainty evidence suggests that dietary patterns with less red and processed meat intake may result in very small reductions in adverse cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes. Primary Funding Source: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42017074074).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31569217     DOI: 10.7326/M19-1583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

Review 1.  Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lisa M Sanders; Meredith L Wilcox; Kevin C Maki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Implementing federal food service guidelines in federal and private worksite cafeterias in the United States leads to improved health outcomes and is cost saving.

Authors:  Renata Micha; Thomas Gaziano; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel; Parke Wilde; Fang Fang Zhang; Lauren Lizewski; Stephen Sy; Junxiu Liu; Mengyuan Ruan; Yujin Lee; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Scientific advice related to nutrient profiling for the development of harmonised mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labelling and the setting of nutrient profiles for restricting nutrition and health claims on foods.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan de Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexandre Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Marco Vinceti; Jean-Louis Bresson; Alfonso Siani
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Red and processed meat: more with less?

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 5.  Methodological Aspects of Diet Quality Indicators in Childhood: A Mapping Review.

Authors:  Ángela Hernández-Ruiz; Liza Alejandra Díaz-Jereda; Casandra Madrigal; María José Soto-Méndez; Anneleen Kuijsten; Ángel Gil
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 11.567

6.  Low Protein Intake Irrespective of Source is Associated with Higher Mortality Among Older Community-dwelling Men.

Authors:  L Langsetmo; S Harrison; S Jonnalagadda; S L Pereira; J M Shikany; S Farsijani; N E Lane; J A Cauley; K Stone; P M Cawthon
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 7.  Indicators and Recommendations for Assessing Sustainable Healthy Diets.

Authors:  Maite M Aldaya; Francisco C Ibañez; Paula Domínguez-Lacueva; María Teresa Murillo-Arbizu; Mar Rubio-Varas; Beatriz Soret; María José Beriain
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-02

8.  Nutrient Composition of a Selection of Plant-Based Ground Beef Alternative Products Available in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa Harnack; Stephanie Mork; Sruthi Valluri; Cecily Weber; Kristine Schmitz; Jennifer Stevenson; Janet Pettit
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Co-consumption of Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grains, and Fiber Reduces the Cancer Risk of Red and Processed Meat in a Large Prospective Cohort of Adults from Alberta's Tomorrow Project.

Authors:  Katerina Maximova; Elham Khodayari Moez; Julia Dabravolskaj; Alexa R Ferdinands; Irina Dinu; Geraldine Lo Siou; Ala Al Rajabi; Paul J Veugelers
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; M K Schubauer-Berigan; R Vermeulen; R M Lunn; K Straif; S Zahm; P Stewart; W D Arroyave; S S Mehta; N Pearce
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.