Literature DB >> 31567104

Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.

Davood Karimi, Guy Nir, Ladan Fazli, Peter C Black, Larry Goldenberg, Septimiu E Salcudean.   

Abstract

Visual inspection of histopathology images of stained biopsy tissue by expert pathologists is the standard method for grading of prostate cancer (PCa). However, this process is time-consuming and subject to high inter-observer variability. Machine learning-based methods have the potential to improve efficient throughput of large volumes of slides while decreasing variability, but they are not easy to develop because they require substantial amounts of labeled training data. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based classification technique and data augmentation methods for accurate grading of PCa in histopathology images in the presence of limited data. Our method combines the predictions of three separate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that work with different patch sizes. This enables our method to take advantage of the greater amount of contextual information in larger patches as well as greater quantity of smaller patches in the labeled training data. The predictions produced by the three CNNs are combined using a logistic regression model, which is trained separately after the CNN training. To effectively train our models, we propose new data augmentation methods and empirically study their effects on the classification accuracy. The proposed method achieves an accuracy of [Formula: see text] in classifying cancerous patches versus benign patches and an accuracy of [Formula: see text] in classifying low-grade (i.e., Gleason grade 3) from high-grade (i.e., Gleason grades 4 and 5) patches. The agreement level of our automatic grading method with expert pathologists is within the range of agreement between pathologists. Our experiments indicate that data augmentation is necessary for achieving expert-level performance with deep learning-based methods. A combination of image-space augmentation and feature-space augmentation leads to the best results. Our study shows that well-designed and properly trained deep learning models can achieve PCa Gleason grading accuracy that is comparable to an expert pathologist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31567104     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2944643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  9 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic.

Authors:  Jeroen van der Laak; Geert Litjens; Francesco Ciompi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Deep learning with noisy labels: Exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Davood Karimi; Haoran Dou; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Automated recognition of glomerular lesions in the kidneys of mice by using deep learning.

Authors:  Airi Akatsuka; Yasushi Horai; Airi Akatsuka
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Accurate diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on histopathology images using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  K S Wang; G Yu; C Xu; X H Meng; J Zhou; C Zheng; Z Deng; L Shang; R Liu; S Su; X Zhou; Q Li; J Li; J Wang; K Ma; J Qi; Z Hu; P Tang; J Deng; X Qiu; B Y Li; W D Shen; R P Quan; J T Yang; L Y Huang; Y Xiao; Z C Yang; Z Li; S C Wang; H Ren; C Liang; W Guo; Y Li; H Xiao; Y Gu; J P Yun; D Huang; Z Song; X Fan; L Chen; X Yan; Z Li; Z C Huang; J Huang; J Luttrell; C Y Zhang; W Zhou; K Zhang; C Yi; C Wu; H Shen; Y P Wang; H M Xiao; H W Deng
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Ramandeep Randhawa; Parag Jain; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Rong Hu; Samuel Hubbard; Jens Eickhoff; Hirak Basu; Rajat Roy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  A Deep Learning Model for the Automatic Recognition of Aplastic Anemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Based on Bone Marrow Smear.

Authors:  Meifang Wang; Chunxia Dong; Yan Gao; Jianlan Li; Mengru Han; Lijun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Automatic Prostate Gleason Grading Using Pyramid Semantic Parsing Network in Digital Histopathology.

Authors:  Yali Qiu; Yujin Hu; Peiyao Kong; Hai Xie; Xiaoliu Zhang; Jiuwen Cao; Tianfu Wang; Baiying Lei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Radio-pathomic mapping model generated using annotations from five pathologists reliably distinguishes high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sean D McGarry; John D Bukowy; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Allison K Lowman; Michael Brehler; Samuel Bobholz; Andrew Nencka; Alex Barrington; Kenneth Jacobsohn; Jackson Unteriner; Petar Duvnjak; Michael Griffin; Mark Hohenwalter; Tucker Keuter; Wei Huang; Tatjana Antic; Gladell Paner; Watchareepohn Palangmonthip; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-09-09

9.  Weakly supervised deep learning for determining the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Xiaobin Hu; Haoming Song; Pengpeng Xu; Haoping Xu; Axel Rominger; Xiaozhu Lin; Bjoern Menze; Biao Li; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 9.236

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.