| Literature DB >> 31566195 |
Cheng Tang1,2,3, Chengzhe Jin1,2,3, Xiangquan Li4, Jiayi Li2,3, Xiaotao Du5, Chao Yan5, Shanshan Lu6, Bo Wei1,2,3, Yan Xu1,2,3, Liming Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate an autologous bone mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold in two animal models of cartilage repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS A rabbit model (n=16) and a minipig model (n=8) of cartilage repair were created with cartilage defects of the knee joints treated with bone marrow stimulation (BMS). In the ECM group, autologous bone MSC-derived ECM scaffolds were implanted into the cartilage defects after bone marrow stimulation. In the BMS group, the cartilage defects were treated by bone marrow stimulation only. The renewal capacity of bone MSCs was measured with a colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) in vitro assay. The extent of cartilage repair was as-sessed at 6 months after surgery. RESULTS In the rabbit model, the macroscopic appearance of the exudate of the healing wounds in the ECM group showed less fibrosis, and the histology showed more evenly distributed chondrocytes compared with the BMS group. The CFU-F assay showed that the number of bone MSCs in the ECM group was approximately was twice that of the BMS group. In the minipig model, the macroscopic appearance and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the ECM group were improved when compared with the BMS group. The repaired tissue in ECM group had similar histological characteristics and biochemical content to normal hyaline cartilage. CONCLUSIONS In two animal models of knee joint cartilage repair, the use of an ECM scaffold increased the number of bone MSCs and improved the extent of cartilage repair.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31566195 PMCID: PMC6784685 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.916481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The procedure for implantation of autologous bone mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds after bone marrow stimulation. The articular cartilage defect was created in the weight-bearing area of the medial femoral condyle in the minipig model (A). After the defect was made, it was treated with bone marrow stimulation using an 18-gauge needle (A), followed by implantation of the autologous bone MSC-derived ECM scaffold by press-fitting (B, C).
Figure 2Macroscopic appearance and histology of the area of exudate of the healing cartilage defect in the autologous bone mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds after bone marrow stimulation. The macroscopic appearance showed that the exudate of the healing wound in the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group (A–C) did not organize well, whereas those in the extracellular matrix (ECM) group (E–G) are undergoing fibrosis. Histology shows that more chondrocytes were evenly distributed in the ECM group (H). The cells show good adhesion to the wall of the scaffold when compared with the BMS group (D).
Figure 3The effect of the autologous bone mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds on the number of bone MSCs in the healing cartilage. The colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) assay was performed to examine the total number of bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the area of healing in the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group and the extracellular matrix (ECM) group (A). The total number of mononuclear cells in the joint showed a significant difference between the MSC group and the BMS group (B). The total CFU-F of bone MSCs was approximately two-fold higher in the ECM group compared with the BMS group (C).
Figure 4Macroscopic appearance and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the repaired tissue in the knee joint of the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group and the extracellular matrix (ECM) group. The repaired cartilage tissue in the extracellular matrix (ECM) group (B) showed a thickness, appearance, and color that were more similar to normal cartilage at 6 months after surgery when compared with the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group (A). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the cartilage defect in the BMS group (red square) was still present, and the subchondral signal intensity was very high (C). However, the cartilage defect in the ECM group was almost filled with repaired tissue (red square), which had similar signal intensity on MRI to normal cartilage, and the subchondral signal intensity was much lower (D).
Figure 5Photomicrographs of the histology show the Safranin-O and Masson’s trichrome staining of the repaired cartilage of the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group and the extracellular matrix (ECM) group at 6 months after surgery. Safranin-O staining showed that the repaired tissue in the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group (A, E) showed poor metachromatic staining and was different from the normal surrounding cartilage and showed clear demarcation (arrowhead). However, the repaired tissue in the extracellular matrix (ECM) group (C, G) showed good integration with the surrounding cartilage (arrowhead), and the intensity of metachromatic staining resembled that of normal cartilage. The chondrocytes formed mature lacunae and were perpendicularly aligned (arrow). Masson’s trichrome staining showed that the defects were partially filled with fibrous tissue in the BMS group (B, F), with large numbers of rounded cells embedded in a fibrous and organized ECM. In contrast, the repaired tissue in the ECM group (D, H) showed several clusters of chondrocyte-like cells (arrow). Growth plates were observed in some zones. (A–D) Magnification ×10. (E–H) Magnification ×400.
Figure 6The glycosaminoglycan (GAG), DNA, and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores of repaired tissue of the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group and the extracellular matrix (ECM) group at 6 months after surgery. The glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the extracellular matrix (ECM) group is not significantly different from that of normal hyaline cartilage (A), and the DNA content in this group was more similar to that of normal hyaline cartilage (B). The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores of the ECM group were significantly higher than that of the bone marrow stimulation (BMS) group (C).