Literature DB >> 21736425

The maturity of tissue-engineered cartilage in vitro affects the repairability for osteochondral defect.

Cheng Zhe Jin1, Jae-Ho Cho, Byung Hyune Choi, Li Ming Wang, Moon Suk Kim, So Ra Park, Jeong Ho Yoon, Jung Ho Yun, Hyun Ju Oh, Byoung-Hyun Min.   

Abstract

Cartilage tissue engineering using cells and biocompatible scaffolds has emerged as a promising approach to repair of cartilage damage. To date, however, no engineered cartilage has proven to be equivalent to native cartilage in terms of biochemical and compression properties, as well as histological features. An alternative strategy for cartilage engineering is to focus on the in vivo regeneration potential of immature engineered cartilage. Here, we used a rabbit model to evaluate the extent to which the maturity of engineered cartilage influenced the remodeling and integration of implanted extracellular matrix scaffolds containing allogenous chondrocytes. Full-thickness osteochondral defects were created in the trochlear groove of New Zealand white rabbits. Left knee defects were left untreated as a control (group 1), and right knee defects were implanted with tissue-engineered cartilage cultured in vitro for 2 days (group 2), 2 weeks (group 3), or 4 weeks (group 4). Histological, chemical, and compression assays of engineered cartilage in vitro showed that biochemical composition became more cartilagenous, and biomechanical property for compression gradually increased with culture time. In an in vivo study, gross imaging and histological observation at 1 and 3 months after implanting in vitro-cultured engineered cartilage showed that defects in groups 3 and 4 were repaired with hyaline cartilage-like tissue, whereas defects were only partially filled with fibrocartilage after 1 month in groups 1 and 2. At 3 months, group 4 showed striking features of hyaline cartilage tissue, with a mature matrix and a columnar arrangement of chondrocytes. Zonal distribution of type II collagen was most prominent, and the International Cartilage Repair Society score was also highest at this time. In addition, the subchondral bone was well ossified. In conclusion, in vivo engineered cartilage was remodeled when implanted; however, its extent to maturity varied with cultivation period. Our results showed that the more matured the engineered cartilage was, the better repaired the osteochondral defect was, highlighting the importance of the in vitro cultivation period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21736425      PMCID: PMC3226058          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  24 in total

1.  [Healing of osteochondral transplants--animal experiment studies using a sheep model].

Authors:  C H Siebert; O Miltner; U Schneider; T Wahner; S Koch; C Niedhart
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Adhesion of tissue-engineered cartilate to native cartilage.

Authors:  R P Silverman; L Bonasser; D Passaretti; M A Randolph; M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Biologic repair of articular cartilage. Defect models in experimental animals and matrix requirements.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury.

Authors:  H J Mankin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Integration of engineered cartilage.

Authors:  B Obradovic; I Martin; R F Padera; S Treppo; L E Freed; G Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Histological evaluation of osteochondral defects: consideration of animal models with emphasis on the rabbit, experimental setup, follow-up and applied methods.

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.481

7.  The effect of graft sizing on osteochondral transplantation.

Authors:  Takeshi Makino; Hiroyuki Fujioka; Mitsunobu Terukina; Shinichi Yoshiya; Nobuzo Matsui; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage.

Authors:  S Wakitani; T Goto; S J Pineda; R G Young; J M Mansour; A I Caplan; V M Goldberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  M Brittberg; A Lindahl; A Nilsson; C Ohlsson; O Isaksson; L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Improved cartilage integration and interfacial strength after enzymatic treatment in a cartilage transplantation model.

Authors:  Jarno van de Breevaart Bravenboer; Caroline D In der Maur; P Koen Bos; Louw Feenstra; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans; Gerjo J V M van Osch
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  14 in total

1.  Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Jeannine M Coburn; Matthew Gibson; Sean Monagle; Zachary Patterson; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Toward engineering a biological joint replacement.

Authors:  Grace D O'Connell; Eric G Lima; Liming Bian; Nadeen O Chahine; Michael B Albro; James L Cook; Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells maintain their chondrogenic capacity in disease and can be used to engineer cartilaginous grafts of clinically relevant dimensions.

Authors:  Yurong Liu; Conor Timothy Buckley; Henrique V Almeida; Kevin J Mulhall; Daniel John Kelly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Functionality of decellularized matrix in cartilage regeneration: A comparison of tissue versus cell sources.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Lianqi Yan; Song Chen; Ming Pei
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Design, construction and mechanical testing of digital 3D anatomical data-based PCL-HA bone tissue engineering scaffold.

Authors:  Qingqiang Yao; Bo Wei; Yang Guo; Chengzhe Jin; Xiaotao Du; Chao Yan; Junwei Yan; Wenhao Hu; Yan Xu; Zhi Zhou; Yijin Wang; Liming Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Cartilage constructs engineered from chondrocytes overexpressing IGF-I improve the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model.

Authors:  H Madry; G Kaul; D Zurakowski; G Vunjak-Novakovic; M Cucchiarini
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 7.  High-density cell systems incorporating polymer microspheres as microenvironmental regulators in engineered cartilage tissues.

Authors:  Loran D Solorio; Eran L Vieregge; Chirag D Dhami; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Chondrogenic differentiation of marrow clots after microfracture with BMSC-derived ECM scaffold in vitro.

Authors:  Bo Wei; Chengzhe Jin; Yan Xu; Xiaotao Du; Chao Yan; Cheng Tang; Mujtaba Ansari; Liming Wang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  An autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular matrix scaffold applied with bone marrow stimulation for cartilage repair.

Authors:  Cheng Tang; Chengzhe Jin; Xiaotao Du; Chao Yan; Byoung-Hyun Min; Yan Xu; Liming Wang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Multilayer Membrane as a Sustained Releasing Growth Factor Delivery System for rhTGF-β3 in Articular Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Soon Sim Yang; Long Hao Jin; Sang-Hyug Park; Moon Suk Kim; Young Jick Kim; Byung Hyune Choi; Chun Tek Lee; So Ra Park; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.