| Literature DB >> 31565996 |
Tengjing Xu1, Xinning Yu1,2, Quanming Yang1, Xiaonan Liu1, Jinghua Fang1,2, Xuesong Dai1,2.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) poses a tough challenge worldwide. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have been proved to play a promising role in cartilage repair. However, enzymatic digestion, ex vivo culture and expansion, with significant senescence and decline in multipotency, limit their application. The present study was designed to obtain micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) through gentle mechanical force and determine the effect of this stem cell-based natural scaffold on repair of full-thickness cartilage defects. In this study, ASCs sprouted from MFAT were characterized by multi-differentiation induction and flow cytometry. Scratch and transwell migration assays were operated to determine whether MFAT could promote migration of chondrocytes in vitro. In a rat model, cartilage defects were created on the femoral groove and treated with intra-articular injection of MFAT or PBS for 6 weeks and 12 weeks (n = 12). At the time points, the degree of cartilage repair was evaluated by histological staining, immunohistochemistry and scoring, respectively. Two unoperated age-matched animals served as native controls. ASCs derived from MFAT possessed properties to differentiate into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes, with expression of mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD29, 44, 90) and no expression of hematopoietic markers (CD31, 34, 45). In addition, MFAT could significantly promote migration of chondrocytes. MFAT-treated defects showed improved macroscopic appearance and histological evaluation compared with PBS-treated defects at both time points. After 12 weeks of treatment, MFAT-treated defects displayed regular surface, high amount of hyaline cartilage, intact subchondral bone reconstruction and corresponding formation of type I, II, and VI collagen, which resembled the normal cartilage. This study demonstrates the efficacy of MFAT on cartilage repair in an animal model for the first time, and the utility of MFAT as a ready-to-use therapeutic alternative to traditional stem cell therapy.Entities:
Keywords: cartilage defect; micro-fragmented adipose tissue; repair; stem cell
Year: 2019 PMID: 31565996 PMCID: PMC6923561 DOI: 10.1177/0963689719880527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of the Lipogems system for obtaining micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT). First, the original adipose tissue was pushed through the blue filter for first cluster reduction. Then, the core device was fiercely shaken several times until the residual blood and oil were washed off by the running saline. The second cluster reduction was performed to obtain MFAT by pushing the inner adipose clusters into a syringe.
International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Macroscopic Evaluation for Osteochondral Defect Regeneration.
| Criteria | Points | |
|---|---|---|
| I. Degree of defect repair | ||
| Level with surrounding cartilage | 4 | |
| 75% repair of defect depth | 3 | |
| 50% repair of defect depth | 2 | |
| 25% repair of defect depth | 1 | |
| 0% repair of defect depth | 0 | |
| II. Integration to border zone | ||
| Complete integration with surrounding cartilage | 4 | |
| Demarcating border <1 mm | 3 | |
| 3/4 of graft integrated, 1/4 with a notable border >1 mm width | 2 | |
| 1/2 of graft integrated with surrounding cartilage, | 1 | |
| From no contact to 1/4 of graft integrated with surrounding cartilage | 0 | |
| III. Macroscopic appearance | ||
| Intact smooth surface | 4 | |
| Fibrillated surface | 3 | |
| Small, scattered fissures or cracks | 2 | |
| Several, small or few but large fissures | 1 | |
| Total degeneration of grafted area | 0 | |
| IV. Overall score | ||
| Grade I: normal | 12 | |
| Grade II: nearly normal | 11-8 | |
| Grade III: abnormal | 7-4 | |
| Grade IV: severely abnormal | 3-1 | |
The Modified O’Driscoll Histologic Score for Histologic Assessment for Cartilage Repair.
| Characteristic | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| I. Hyaline cartilage (%) | ||
| 80–100 | 8 | |
| 60–80 | 6 | |
| 40–60 | 4 | |
| 20–40 | 2 | |
| 0–20 | 0 | |
| II. Structural characteristics | ||
| A. Surface irregularity | ||
| Smooth and intact | 2 | |
| Fissures | 1 | |
| Severe disruption, fibrillation | 0 | |
| B. Structural integrity | ||
| Normal | 2 | |
| Slight disruption, including cysts | 1 | |
| Severe lack of integration | 0 | |
| C. Thickness | ||
| 100% of normal adjacent cartilage | 2 | |
| 50% to 100% or thicker than normal | 1 | |
| 0–50% | 0 | |
| D. Bonding to adjacent cartilage | ||
| Bonded at both ends of graft | 2 | |
| Bonded at one end/partially both ends | 1 | |
| Not bonded | 0 | |
| III. Freedom from cellular changes of degeneration | ||
| Normal cellularity, no clusters | 2 | |
| Slight hypocellularity, <25% chondrocyte clusters | 1 | |
| Moderate hypocellularity, >25% clusters | 0 | |
| IV. Freedom from degenerate changes in adjacent cartilage | ||
| Normal cellularity, no clusters, normal staining | 3 | |
| Normal cellularity, mild clusters, moderate staining | 2 | |
| Mild or mod hypocellularity, slight staining | 1 | |
| Severe hypocellularity, slight staining | 0 | |
| V. Reconstitution of subchondral bone | ||
| Complete reconstitution | 2 | |
| Greater than 50% recon | 1 | |
| 50% or less recon | 0 | |
| VI. Bonding of repair cartilage to de novo subchondral bone | ||
| Complete and uninterrupted | 2 | |
| <100% but >50% recon | 1 | |
| <50% complete | 0 | |
| VII. Safranin O staining | ||
| >80% homogeneous positive stain | 2 | |
| 40%–80% homogeneous positive stain | 1 | |
| <40% homogeneous positive stain | 0 | |
| Total score | Max27 | |
Figure 2.Characterization and identification of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) from MFAT. (A) Representative photograph of primary ASCs exhibited a typical spindle shape morphology (×40). (B, C) After the adipogenic and osteogenic induction, the lipid droplets and calcium nodules secreted from differentiated ASCs were visible with Oil Red O and Alizarin red staining, respectively (×40). (D) The differentiated chondrogenic pellets were cut into 5 µm sections and stained positive with Alcian blue staining. (E) The surface makers of ASCs were detected by flow cytometry analysis and the result demonstrated positive expression of CD29, CD44, and CD90, but negative expression of CD31, CD34, and CD45.
Figure 3.Effects of MFAT on chondrocytes migration and progression. (A) Representative pictures of scratch assays. Chondrocytes migrated into the scratch area with treatment of MFAT or PBS for 24 h after scratched at confluence. (B) The healing ratio in the MFAT group was significantly higher than the control group (**p < 0.01). (C) In transwell assays, migrated cells were visible with crystal violet staining; representative pictures are shown. (D) The cell number of migration in the MFAT group was significantly higher than the control group (***p < 0.001).
Figure 4.Effect of MFAT on osteochondral defects repair in vivo at 6 weeks post-surgery. (A) Macroscopic appearance of femoral condyle cartilage. (B) ICRS macroscopic assessment scores in cartilage samples. There was no significance between two groups (n = 12, p = 0.0787). (C) HE, Safranin O, and immunohistochemical staining of repaired cartilage. (D) Modified O’Driscoll histologic scores in cartilage samples. The result showed that MFAT group had a significantly higher average score compared with the control group (n = 12, **p < 0.01). Values represent means ± standard deviation.
Figure 5.Effect of MFAT on osteochondral defects repair in vivo at 12 weeks post-surgery. (A) Macroscopic appearance of femoral condyle cartilage. (B) ICRS macroscopic assessment scores in cartilage samples. Average score of MFAT group was significantly higher than the control group (n = 12, *p < 0.05). (C) HE, Safranin O, and immunohistochemical staining of repaired cartilage. (D) Modified O’Driscoll histologic scores in cartilage samples. The result showed that MFAT group had a significantly higher average score compared with the control group (n = 12, *p < 0.05). Values represent means ± standard deviation.