Literature DB >> 31563955

Investigation of tylosin in feed of feedlot cattle and effects on liver abscess prevalence, and fecal and soil microbiomes and resistomes1.

Margaret D Weinroth1, Jennifer N Martin1, Enrique Doster2, Ifigenia Geornaras1, Jennifer K Parker3, Clay R Carlson1, Jessica L Metcalf1, Paul S Morley4, Keith E Belk1.   

Abstract

Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle are detrimental to animal performance and economic return. Tylosin, a macrolide antibiotic, is used to reduce prevalence of liver abscesses, though there is variable efficacy among different groups of cattle. There is an increased importance in better understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of this condition because of growing concern over antibiotic resistance and increased scrutiny regarding use of antibiotics in food animal production. The objective of this study was to compare the microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance genes (resistomes) of feces of feedlot cattle administered or not administered tylosin and in their pen soil in 3 geographical regions with differing liver abscess prevalences. Cattle (total of 2,256) from 3 geographical regions were selected for inclusion based on dietary supplementation with tylosin (yes/no). Feces and pen soil samples were collected before harvest, and liver abscesses were identified at harvest. Shotgun and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing were used to evaluate the soil and feces. Microbiome and resistome composition of feces (as compared by UniFrac distances and Euclidian distances, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) among tylosin or no tylosin-administered cattle. However, feedlot location was associated with differences (P ≤ 0.05) of resistomes and microbiomes. Using LASSO, a statistical model identified both fecal and soil microbial communities as predictive of liver abscess prevalence in pens. This model explained 75% of the variation in liver abscess prevalence, though a larger sample size would be needed to increase robustness of the model. These data suggest that tylosin exposure does not have a large impact on cattle resistomes or microbiomes, but instead, location of cattle production may be a stronger driver of both the resistome and microbiome composition of feces.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; antibiotic resistance; resistome; shotgun metagenomics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31563955      PMCID: PMC6827412          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  47 in total

1.  Genome sequence and assembly of Bos indicus.

Authors:  Flavio C Canavez; Douglas D Luche; Paul Stothard; Katia R M Leite; Juliana M Sousa-Canavez; Graham Plastow; João Meidanis; Maria Angélica Souza; Pedro Feijao; Steve S Moore; Luiz H Camara-Lopes
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Mark A Bradford; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Aymé Spor; Omry Koren; Ruth Ley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition.

Authors:  Syrie M Hermans; Hannah L Buckley; Bradley S Case; Fiona Curran-Cournane; Matthew Taylor; Gavin Lear
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data.

Authors:  Pierre Legendre; Eugene D Gallagher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Rapid Communication: 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid characterization of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle from three states in the United States.

Authors:  M D Weinroth; C R Carlson; J N Martin; J L Metcalf; P S Morley; K E Belk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  The discussion goes on: What is the role of Euryarchaeota in humans?

Authors:  H-P Horz; G Conrads
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

8.  Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure.

Authors:  William C Rice; Michael L Galyean; Stephen B Cox; Scot E Dowd; N Andy Cole
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Effects of Ceftiofur and Chlortetracycline on the Resistomes of Feedlot Cattle.

Authors:  Paul S Morley; Keith E Belk; Margaret D Weinroth; H Morgan Scott; Bo Norby; Guy H Loneragan; Noelle R Noyes; Pablo Rovira; Enrique Doster; Xiang Yang; Dale R Woerner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Peixin Jiao; Ousama AlZahal; Xiaolai Xie; Karen A Beauchemin; Dongyan Niu; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  FI: The Fecobiome Initiative.

Authors:  Panagiotis Sapountzis; Serafino Teseo; Saria Otani; Frank Møller Aarestrup; Evelyne Forano; Garett Suen; George Tsiamis; Bradd Haley; Jo Ann Van Kessel; Sharon A Huws
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Flavia Ivana Mansilla; Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco; María Hortencia Miranda; Edoardo Puglisi; María Elena Fatima Nader-Macías; Graciela Margarita Vignolo; Cecilia Alejandra Fontana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  A global phylogenomic and metabolic reconstruction of the large intestine bacterial community of domesticated cattle.

Authors:  S Teseo; S Otani; C Brinch; S Leroy; P Ruiz; M Desvaux; E Forano; F M Aarestrup; P Sapountzis
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 16.837

5.  Resistomes and microbiome of meat trimmings and colon content from culled cows raised in conventional and organic production systems.

Authors:  Paul S Morley; Keith E Belk; Margaret D Weinroth; Kevin M Thomas; Enrique Doster; Amit Vikram; John W Schmidt; Terrance M Arthur; Tommy L Wheeler; Jennifer K Parker; Ayanna S Hanes; Najla Alekoza; Cory Wolfe; Jessica L Metcalf
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.