Emily P Zeitler1, Daniel J Friedman2, Zak Loring3, Kristen B Campbell2, Sarah A Goldstein2, Zachary K Wegermann2, Jane Schutz2, Nicole Smith2, Eric Black-Maier2, Sana M Al-Khatib3, Jonathan P Piccini3. 1. Division of Cardiology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Division of Cardiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Division of Cardiology, The Dartmouth Institute, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: emily.p.zeitler@hitchcock.org. 2. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, The Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reports on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) cumulatively demonstrate a low rate of complications, but clinical experience with this technology is limited compared with transvenous devices. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze S-ICD complications reported to the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. METHODS: We reviewed all S-ICD events reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience submitted over 24 months (from February 2016 through February 2018) through a prospective and standardized approach at a time when an estimated 15,000 S-ICDs were in service. RESULTS: After removing duplicate entries and nonclinical events (n = 493), 1604 events remained. A total of 542 instances of infection were reported with system removal in 414/542 (77.5%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 550 patients, and 382 (69%) were attributed to oversensing; in response, 254 (56%), 147 (33%), and 80 (18%) patients underwent system reprogramming, removal, or revision, respectively. There were 15 deaths, and causes included defibrillation failure during follow-up (n = 2), ventricular fibrillation induced by the device (n = 4), device-device interaction resulting in undersensing (n = 1), procedure-related complications (n = 4), and uncertain etiology (n = 4). There were 137 reports of system migration, and in 57 (42%) of these, there were associated inappropriate shocks. System migration events were managed with a combination of system revision (69 [51%]), reprogramming (25 [18%]), and system removal (44 [32%]). CONCLUSION: Several S-ICD complications have been reported that appear to be related to the ICD's design and function over time. A better understanding of these complications may help inform patient selection, implant technique, and postimplantation management.
BACKGROUND: Reports on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) cumulatively demonstrate a low rate of complications, but clinical experience with this technology is limited compared with transvenous devices. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze S-ICD complications reported to the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. METHODS: We reviewed all S-ICD events reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience submitted over 24 months (from February 2016 through February 2018) through a prospective and standardized approach at a time when an estimated 15,000 S-ICDs were in service. RESULTS: After removing duplicate entries and nonclinical events (n = 493), 1604 events remained. A total of 542 instances of infection were reported with system removal in 414/542 (77.5%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 550 patients, and 382 (69%) were attributed to oversensing; in response, 254 (56%), 147 (33%), and 80 (18%) patients underwent system reprogramming, removal, or revision, respectively. There were 15 deaths, and causes included defibrillation failure during follow-up (n = 2), ventricular fibrillation induced by the device (n = 4), device-device interaction resulting in undersensing (n = 1), procedure-related complications (n = 4), and uncertain etiology (n = 4). There were 137 reports of system migration, and in 57 (42%) of these, there were associated inappropriate shocks. System migration events were managed with a combination of system revision (69 [51%]), reprogramming (25 [18%]), and system removal (44 [32%]). CONCLUSION: Several S-ICD complications have been reported that appear to be related to the ICD's design and function over time. A better understanding of these complications may help inform patient selection, implant technique, and postimplantation management.
Authors: Sana M Al-Khatib; William G Stevenson; Michael J Ackerman; William J Bryant; David J Callans; Anne B Curtis; Barbara J Deal; Timm Dickfeld; Michael E Field; Gregg C Fonarow; Anne M Gillis; Christopher B Granger; Stephen C Hammill; Mark A Hlatky; José A Joglar; G Neal Kay; Daniel D Matlock; Robert J Myerburg; Richard L Page Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Daniel J Friedman; Craig S Parzynski; E Kevin Heist; Andrea M Russo; Joseph G Akar; James V Freeman; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ali A Mithani; Heaton Kath; Krystal Hunter; John Andriulli; Matthew Ortman; Julie Field; Andrea M Russo Journal: Europace Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Claudio Schuger; Christopher A Beck; Mary W Brown; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; N A Mark Estes; Henry Greenberg; W Jackson Hall; David T Huang; Josef Kautzner; Helmut Klein; Scott McNitt; Brian Olshansky; Morio Shoda; David Wilber; Wojciech Zareba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Naga Venkata K Pothineni; Tharian Cherian; Neel Patel; Jeffrey Smietana; David S Frankel; Rajat Deo; Andrew E Epstein; Francis E Marchlinski; Robert D Schaller Journal: J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Date: 2022-04-15
Authors: Patrick H Pun; Craig S Parzynski; Daniel J Friedman; Gillian Sanders; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Babak Nazer; Zack Dale; Gianmarco Carrassa; Nosheen Reza; Tuna Ustunkaya; Nikolaos Papoutsidakis; Andrew Gray; Stacey J Howell; Miriam R Elman; Paolo Pieragnoli; Giuseppe Ricciardi; Daniel Jacoby; David S Frankel; Anjali Owens; Iacopo Olivotto; Stephen B Heitner Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Christos Zormpas; Jörg Eiringhaus; Henrike A K Hillmann; Stephan Hohmann; Johanna Müller-Leisse; Jan D Schmitto; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: M L Narducci; R Scacciavillani; G Pinnacchio; G Bencardino; F Perna; G Comerci; M Campisi; I Ceccarelli; C Pavone; F Spera; A Bisignani; F Crea; G Pelargonio Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-07-20