Literature DB >> 31560581

Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.

Alexander Melamed1, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain2, Pedro T Ramirez2.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID： 31560581      PMCID： PMC6864845          DOI： 10.1200/JCO.19.01164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN： 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


× No keyword cloud information.
  47 in total

Review 1.  A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Andrae Vandross; Caitlin Toomey; Michael Cheung; Jason Rho; Steven Quinn; Satish Jacob Chacko; Durga Borkar; Victor Gall; Senthil Selvaraj; Nancy Ho; Adam Cifu
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy Has Many Benefits Compared with Open Radical Hysterectomy: Will the LACC Trial Cause the Premature Demise of This Procedure?

Authors:  R Wendel Naumann
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  N Colombo; S Carinelli; A Colombo; C Marini; D Rollo; C Sessa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study.

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Marion R Piedmonte; Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Robert S Mannel; Richard Barakat; Michael L Pearl; Sudarshan K Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Diver; Emily Hinchcliff; Allison Gockley; Alexander Melamed; Leah Contrino; Sarah Feldman; Whitfield Growdon
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  The influence of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Sharyn N Lewin; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.

Authors:  Leigh A Cantrell; Alberto Mendivil; Paola A Gehrig; John F Boggess
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.

Authors:  Antonino Ditto; Fabio Martinelli; Giorgio Bogani; Maria L Gasparri; Violante Di Donato; Flavia Zanaboni; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.

Authors:  Sha-Sha Zhang; Tian Ding; Zheng-Hui Cui; Yuan Lv; Ruo-An Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817
View more
  7 in total

1.  Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Kate J Krause; Ana I Tergas; Jason D Wright; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  [Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery for primary treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: randomisation decides].

Authors:  Alexander Fabian; David Krug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Chunlin Chen; Ping Liu; Anwei Lu; Hongwei Zhao; Xuemei Zhan; Hui Duan; Pengfei Li; Weidong Zhao; Jilong Yao; Donglin Li; Haixia Jiang; Mubiao Liu; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Effect of crisis intervention nursing on perioperative psychological state and self-efficacy of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yan Li; Sisi Chen; Mengjie Xu; Jiao Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.

Authors:  Fan Chun Yang; Wei Huang; Weihong Yang; Jie Liu; Guihai Ai; Ning Luo; Jing Guo; Peng Teng Chua; Zhongping Cheng
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with apparently early stage uterine serous carcinoma - an anachronism?

Authors:  Günter Emons
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.

Authors:  R Wojdat; E Malanowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.