Literature DB >> 20153886

Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.

Leigh A Cantrell1, Alberto Mendivil, Paola A Gehrig, John F Boggess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES.: To assess progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for women with cervical cancer who underwent type III robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH). METHODS.: A retrospective analysis of women who underwent RRH from 2005 to 2008 was performed. The data analyzed included patient demographics, histology, clinical stage, surgical margins, lymph node and disease status. Comparison was made to a group of historical open radical hysterectomies. Survival statistics were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS.: Seventy-one women underwent attempted RRH during the study period. Eight were excluded from analysis, 4 for non-cervical primary and 4 cases aborted due to extent of disease. Squamous was the most common histology (62%) followed by adenocarcinoma (32%). Median patient age was 43 years. There was one intraoperative complication (asystole after induction) and two postoperative complications (ICU admission to rule out myocardial infarction and reoperation for cuff dehiscence). Of the patients who underwent RRH, 32% received whole-pelvis radiation with chemo sensitization. The median follow-up was 12.2 months (range 0.2-36.3 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated 94% PFS and OS at 36 months due to the recurrence and death of one patient. Compared with a historical cohort at our institution, there was no statistically significant difference in PFS (P=0.27) or OS (P=0.47). CONCLUSIONS.: RRH is safe and feasible and has been shown to be associated with improved operative measures. This study shows that at 3 years, RRH appears to have PFS and OS equivalent to that of traditional laparotomy. Longer follow-up is needed, but early data are supportive of at least equivalent oncologic outcomes compared with other surgical modalities. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153886     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  29 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Kate J Krause; Ana I Tergas; Jason D Wright; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 3.  New Developments in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine Ikard Stewart; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.

Authors:  M Steven Piver; Ali Ghomi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  Make New Friends But Keep the Old: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Programs.

Authors:  Kari L Ring; Pedro T Ramirez; Lesley B Conrad; William Burke; R Wendel Naumann; Mark F Munsell; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience.

Authors:  A Kubilay Ertan; Michael Ulbricht; Kirsten Huebner; Alexander Di Liberto
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

8.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters.

Authors:  Stephanie L Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Kaled M Alektiar; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Mario M Leitao; Elizabeth L Jewell; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.